The chaos, violence, & drug death crisis in California worsen
The open drug scene in San Francisco yesterday was worse than anything I’ve seen in over 25 years here
Violence, chaos, death
There is a solution. Shelter First. Treatment First.
But that requires new leadership
California spends more on mental illness per capita than any other state & has the worst outcomes
Most everyone on the street suffers addiction and/or mental illness
Many were recently released from prison
They need psychiatric & addiction care
People can be found lying face down on sidewalks across cities
Open drug scenes are crowded and spreading
Our leaders including Gov. @GavinNewsom admit they don’t know what to do
But every nation handles open drug scenes the same way. Shelter First. Treatment First. Housing Earned.
Call it “Cal-Psych”
I went to SF yesterday to promote this plan to Newsom & with @Kevin_Faulconer
Our mental health care system is both fragmented and duplicative, which is part of the reason why we spend the most and have the worst outcomes
When people leave prison or drug treatment they have nowhere to go and end up on the street, back in prison, or dead
There’s strong support for Cal-Psych among everyone from experts to the homeless themselves
Cal. counties were overwhelmed by the addiction crisis & de-incarceration
They’ve proven incapable of solving the problem
Nellie, homeless, says Cal-Psych should deploy mobile units
Everyone has expressed openness to Cal-Psych, even Gov. @GavinNewsom who I button-holed yesterday in San Francisco, and who put me in touch with his aide
(I am obviously skeptical, but I feel an obligation to keep trying )
In the video above, Nellie described different kinds of homeless, including the people who want to be homeless, and the mentally ill
Here she describes why we need Cal-Psych vans to provide psychiatric & addiction care
Cal-Psych could place people in the facility right for them
Former San Diego Mayor @Kevin_Faulconer told me he supports “Shelter First, Treatment First”
Faulconer has the most experience, the most comprehensive plan, and the clearest thinking, which is why I endorsed him, even as I push others, including Newsom, to embrace Cal-Psych
I have now met all the major gubernatorial candidates in person, save Larry Elder, who I interviewed over email
To all I have emphasized the need for a Shelter/Treatment First & Housing Earned policy, centrally organized, as in other developed nations
Cal-Psych can do it!
I wore scrubs as a Cal-Psych costume. I am not a doctor or nurse & have never claimed to be one!
My bio for years has said “MD” in my *handle* not *name* = my initials
I have updated my bio to emphasize this
“Low drug prices, lack of law enforcement and lack of social control attract drug users towards the open drug scene & the increase in problems appears to have been more rapid than the increase in the population of addicts”
In video, a man in a red coat arrives & buys drugs…
The man in red coat has smoked the fentanyl he bought & is now high
“The scenes are often found in city centres… users may be in poor physical & mental condition & the locations will often serve as a focal point for drug dealing. The situation might grow out of police control”
Open drug scenes “attract less socially stable adolescents & others who have problems fitting in… Homelessness is often prevalent as different types of dysfunctions are prevalent & increased rates of crime may be found in the neighbourhood.”
California’s response to open drug scenes has been strictly harm reduction, but the most important study on them warns that “although harm reduction might decrease the health harms it does not decrease the size & seriousness of the open drugs scenes.”
Progressives insist the problem is lack of housing, but giving away free housing in the Tenderloin neighborhood is what created, and sustains, the open drug scene
By contrast, in Portugal, “The open drug scene areas were literally destroyed and rebuilt”
“All the cities describe open drug scenes that tended to grow out of control. These scenes were regarded as destructive to individual drug users and as a problematic nuisance to society
“None of the cities succeeded by treatment and medical and social support measures alone.”
“Provision of increased helping measures alone seems to have been unsuccessful and when provided within the open drug scenes, may even have increased their attraction.”
Sound familiar?
“A common theme was that on-going political and ideological conflicts seem to have prevented solutions and effective measures for several years. Only when consensus had been reached at sufficiently high political and administrative levels, has real progress been achieved.”
San Francisco & other progressive cities are making the same mistake that Amsterdam and other cities made in the 1980s with “helping only” (Housing First/harm reduction) policies. In truth, both carrots and sticks are always required
So “60 Minutes” straight up lied. Plus, they could have gone to a White House press briefing or asked Trump after a cabinet meeting or on Air Force One. They chose not to. Totally unethical & irresponsible behavior. @bariweiss was right to hold the piece.
It was "corporate censorship" for CBS @bariweiss to delay her story, says "60 Minutes" reporter Sharyn Alfonsi. But Alfonsi presented no evidence to support her allegation. And Alfonsi has a history of biased reporting that even liberal "fact-checkers" denounced as inaccurate.
In April of 2021, CBS’s “60 Minutes” falsely claimed that Florida Governor Ron DeSantis exclusively chose Publix, a major Florida supermarket chain, to distribute Covid vaccines because it had donated to his political campaign.
Rep. Jared Moskowitz, a Democrat who helped oversee the state’s vaccine distribution at the time, repeatedly debunked the accusation. He did so first in response to a March 2, 2021, Miami Herald piece.
“This idea why @Publix was picked has been utter nonsense,” Moskowitz wrote on X, formerly Twitter. “We reached out to all pharmacies and they were the only one who at the time could execute on the mission.”
On April 4, the day the “60 Minutes” segment aired, Moskowitz tweeted, “@60Minutes I said this before and I’ll say it again. @Publix was recommended by @FLSERT and @HealthyFla as the other pharmacies were not ready to start. Period! Full Stop! No one from the Governor’s office suggested Publix. It’s just absolute malarkey.”
Now, the same reporter who did the flawed DeSantis piece, Sharyn Alfonsi, has accused her employer of censoring her story about deportees El Salvador’s prison. “The public will correctly identify this as corporate censorship,” Alfonsi wrote in an email to her colleagues that has been viewed four million times on X.
However, Alfonsi offered no evidence to support her allegation of “corporate censorship,” implying that people to whom Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss reports caused her to delay the piece.
Neither Weiss nor Alfonsi responded to a request for comment. If either does, we will update this story immediately. Moreover, we will report any evidence that we or others find that shows that corporate executives above Weiss directed her to kill the story. So far, there is none.
And an editorial decision is not the same as censorship, particularly since Weiss said she is delaying, not killing, the segment.
Alfonsi, in her leaked email, said she tried to get a response from the Trump administration but couldn’t, which was one of the reasons Weiss cited in her email to CBS staff for holding back the piece.
An experienced television news journalist, who has been in the business for three decades, said CBS could have done what it has often done in the past, which is to ask a Trump official at one of the many press availabilities.
“They could have sent a CBS reporter to the White House press briefing,” the person said, or had a reporter ask President Trump directly during one of his frequent press conferences at the White House and on Air Force One. The CBS website shows that it has at least six full-time reporters at the White House.
“The episode shows Sharyn’s poor investigative skills,” the person added. “She should have doorstepped the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security or sent someone to the White House.”
To “doorstop” a person is when a journalist confronts someone, such as a senior government official, often when they are coming or going into their workplace.
“Sharyn could have gone to the briefing herself, or CBS could have gone in and said ‘CBS has finished an investigation. Here are the allegations. How do you respond?’”
Alfonsi falsely claimed in her segment that DeSantis gave an “exclusive” to Publix. Floridians could get the Covid vaccine from many different sources, including county health departments, other major pharmacy chains including CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart, and mass vaccination drive-thru sites with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
Three major liberal or left-wing fact-checking organizations and the liberal Boston public TV station WGBH all criticized the piece. “60 Minutes’ misses the mark in its story about Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and COVID-19 vaccines,” wrote Poynter. “A sloppy moment on Sunday’s show is raising serious concerns.”
Wrote Politifact, “While “60 Minutes” focused on his emphatic denial, it left out the background that he offered about how the state had been working with other retail pharmacies to distribute coronavirus vaccines at long-term care facilities in December and his own interactions with Publix customers.”
Said the progressive Media Nation, “It’s a rare day when we encounter as blatant an example of liberal media bias as in the “60 Minutes” report last Sunday on Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis…Unfortunately, the botched story on DeSantis, a Republican, will be cited by conservatives for a long time as evidence that you just can’t trust the media.”
And a Boston CBS News reporter said, “If you’re going to smear someone by guilt-by-association, or pay-to-play, which is about the most serious offense a public official can engage in, you better have the facts in a row. If you don’t, you’d best leave it out.”
Here is the liberal Boston PBS member station segment on Sharyn Alfonsi's biased and inaccurate story. Every single person in it criticizes Alfonsi's piece about Ron DeSantis' vaccine roll-out.
Nobody who looks at this walks away thinking that Alfonsi did anything other than an irresponsible hit piece.
Days before last year’s election, the media claimed Trump wanted to kill Liz Cheney, which we debunked at the time. @BBC has now admitted it was a lie. @CNN should do the same. Notably, BBC & CNN have, for years, promoted censorship of their competitors for “misinformation.”
The media around the world demand government censorship on the basis of the disinformation it produces on Trump, covid, climate, gender, Ukraine, etc. The EU is currently paying European media to act as “trusted flaggers” — censors — of social media.
It’s digital totalitarianism.
Marco Rubio is the most powerful Secretary of State since Kissinger. As such, it is significant that he believes the US has recovered alien tech and given it to private military contractors. A senior Rubio advisor says, “We’re headed toward massive disclosure.”
Since May of this year, Marco Rubio has served in a dual role as President Donald Trump’s National Security Advisor and Secretary of State. The National Security Advisor is the President’s principal in-house advisor on all national security matters, chairs the National Security Council, coordinates the interagency process across the government, and briefs the President daily.
As Secretary of State, Rubio negotiates treaties, appoints and directs ambassadors, controls the $84 billion State Department and USAID budget, oversees 80,000 employees at more than 270 diplomatic posts worldwide, and has direct authority over diplomatic security, intelligence sharing, sanctions enforcement, and emergency evacuations of U.S. citizens abroad.
The last official to hold both such positions was Henry Kissinger from 1973 to 1975. For Rubio, who was also the former ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and vice-chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, to play both roles reflects President Trump’s high confidence in him.
As such, it is significant that Rubio believes that elements within the US government have recovered technology from a nonhuman intelligence, reverse-engineered it, and let private military contractors take control of it in ways that could be undermining national security and result in a Pearl Harbor-like event.
“The real risk in transferring technology that is not useful to us today to a corporate entity over decades,” says Rubio, “is that the corporate entity comes to basically possess and control access to it for their own purposes, not for the purposes of national security.”
Nick Pope, who investigated Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) for the UK Ministry of Defence, said, “It’s hard to overstate the significance of [Rubio’s] statement. Rubio’s remarks are so forthright that one could speculate they’re officially-authorized prelude to Disclosure, to test the waters ahead of an official, Presidential announcement.”
The State Department declined to provide an on-the-record comment to Public for this story. A spokesperson for the Department of War said it had no “verifiable information to substantiate claims that any U.S. government or private company programs regarding the possession or reverse-engineering of extraterrestrial materials and technology have existed in the past or exist currently...."
Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism and to read the full article!
Any true skeptic of this issue should want significantly more government transparency and disclosure on UAP. Anyone arguing against greater transparency and disclosure is telling you that they want to continue the cover-up.
If you belive that this is all a dangerous delusion and social contagion resulting from years of government disinfo to cover up secret weapons programs, which has now infected the highest levels of government, then you should be the loudest advocate for UAP transparency and disclosure in the world.
The secrecy has gone on for too long. It is destablizing for our highest security, defense, and intelligence officials say one thing to journalists and filmmakers and for the DOD to say something completely different. The State Department, CIA, ODNI, and White House all declined to comment publicly for my piece. We need our government officials to be honest about what is going on.
There is no security justification for this level of secrecy. We are free people governed by a constitution that protects us against unaccountable government actors. We must fight to maintain that status.
We can trust Oracle to centralize our data in a single place to create digital IDs, says Larry Ellison. We can't. Thanks to a "previously unknown & widespread vulnerability" in Oracle's "E-Business Suite software" thousands of us recently had our personal data stolen.
"The Washington Post... didn’t explain why it took almost a month to determine the amount of data stolen and has not responded to multiple requests for comment." @JeffBezos @CyberScoopNews
@JeffBezos @CyberScoopNews "Oracle quietly admits data breach, days after lawsuit accused it of cover-up"
New Epstein files show Rep. @StaceyPlaskett got real-time help via text messages from Jeffrey Epstein on how to hurt Trump during 2019 congressional hearing with former Trump attorney. Plaskett is the person who smeared us during Twitter Files hearing & falsely accused @mtaibbi
From WaPo:
"At 10:02 a.m., Epstein texted Plaskett: 'Great outfit'
'You look great,' he added at 10:22 a.m. 'Thanks!' she replied shortly afterward.
"'Cohen brought up RONA - keeper of the secrets,' Epstein texted, misspelling Graff’s first name."
“'RONA??'” Plaskett responded. “'Quick I’m up next is that an acronym,' she added, suggesting she would question Cohen soon."