The chaos, violence, & drug death crisis in California worsen
The open drug scene in San Francisco yesterday was worse than anything I’ve seen in over 25 years here
Violence, chaos, death
There is a solution. Shelter First. Treatment First.
But that requires new leadership
California spends more on mental illness per capita than any other state & has the worst outcomes
Most everyone on the street suffers addiction and/or mental illness
Many were recently released from prison
They need psychiatric & addiction care
People can be found lying face down on sidewalks across cities
Open drug scenes are crowded and spreading
Our leaders including Gov. @GavinNewsom admit they don’t know what to do
But every nation handles open drug scenes the same way. Shelter First. Treatment First. Housing Earned.
Call it “Cal-Psych”
I went to SF yesterday to promote this plan to Newsom & with @Kevin_Faulconer
Our mental health care system is both fragmented and duplicative, which is part of the reason why we spend the most and have the worst outcomes
When people leave prison or drug treatment they have nowhere to go and end up on the street, back in prison, or dead
There’s strong support for Cal-Psych among everyone from experts to the homeless themselves
Cal. counties were overwhelmed by the addiction crisis & de-incarceration
They’ve proven incapable of solving the problem
Nellie, homeless, says Cal-Psych should deploy mobile units
Everyone has expressed openness to Cal-Psych, even Gov. @GavinNewsom who I button-holed yesterday in San Francisco, and who put me in touch with his aide
(I am obviously skeptical, but I feel an obligation to keep trying )
In the video above, Nellie described different kinds of homeless, including the people who want to be homeless, and the mentally ill
Here she describes why we need Cal-Psych vans to provide psychiatric & addiction care
Cal-Psych could place people in the facility right for them
Former San Diego Mayor @Kevin_Faulconer told me he supports “Shelter First, Treatment First”
Faulconer has the most experience, the most comprehensive plan, and the clearest thinking, which is why I endorsed him, even as I push others, including Newsom, to embrace Cal-Psych
I have now met all the major gubernatorial candidates in person, save Larry Elder, who I interviewed over email
To all I have emphasized the need for a Shelter/Treatment First & Housing Earned policy, centrally organized, as in other developed nations
Cal-Psych can do it!
I wore scrubs as a Cal-Psych costume. I am not a doctor or nurse & have never claimed to be one!
My bio for years has said “MD” in my *handle* not *name* = my initials
I have updated my bio to emphasize this
“Low drug prices, lack of law enforcement and lack of social control attract drug users towards the open drug scene & the increase in problems appears to have been more rapid than the increase in the population of addicts”
In video, a man in a red coat arrives & buys drugs…
The man in red coat has smoked the fentanyl he bought & is now high
“The scenes are often found in city centres… users may be in poor physical & mental condition & the locations will often serve as a focal point for drug dealing. The situation might grow out of police control”
Open drug scenes “attract less socially stable adolescents & others who have problems fitting in… Homelessness is often prevalent as different types of dysfunctions are prevalent & increased rates of crime may be found in the neighbourhood.”
California’s response to open drug scenes has been strictly harm reduction, but the most important study on them warns that “although harm reduction might decrease the health harms it does not decrease the size & seriousness of the open drugs scenes.”
Progressives insist the problem is lack of housing, but giving away free housing in the Tenderloin neighborhood is what created, and sustains, the open drug scene
By contrast, in Portugal, “The open drug scene areas were literally destroyed and rebuilt”
“All the cities describe open drug scenes that tended to grow out of control. These scenes were regarded as destructive to individual drug users and as a problematic nuisance to society
“None of the cities succeeded by treatment and medical and social support measures alone.”
“Provision of increased helping measures alone seems to have been unsuccessful and when provided within the open drug scenes, may even have increased their attraction.”
Sound familiar?
“A common theme was that on-going political and ideological conflicts seem to have prevented solutions and effective measures for several years. Only when consensus had been reached at sufficiently high political and administrative levels, has real progress been achieved.”
San Francisco & other progressive cities are making the same mistake that Amsterdam and other cities made in the 1980s with “helping only” (Housing First/harm reduction) policies. In truth, both carrots and sticks are always required
The Australian PM @AlboMP wants global censorship to counter misinformation. But only free speech can counter misinformation. Please share this to affirm your opposition to his awful bill!
I am concerned about the impact of social media on children, but this bill is a Trojan horse to create digital IDs, which is a giant leap into the totalitarian dystopia depicted in "Black Mirror," and already in place in China. And @AlboMP has proven censorial and untrustworthy.
Lovers of free speech just scored victories in the US, EU, and Ireland. But now we’re in pitched battles in Britain & Australia, which is at dire risk of trying to censor the entire planet. This is about all of us, so I’m flying down. Share this to show solidarity. LFG!!!
I am headed directly to Canberra to meet with other free speech lovers and the wise and just representatives of the Australian people, who I am confident will kill the @AlboMP governments aggressive and hostile assault on the freedom that enables democracy and all other freedoms.
Australia belongs to its people and it is up to them and their representatives to decide whether they want to remain a liberal democratic nation or instantaneously become a totalitarian one.
But it is the duty of friends of Australia to bluntly warn that @AlboMP is pushing a censorship law that would not only end free speech for Australians but also be viewed as a hostile assault on the free Internet worldwide by people in other nations, including in the US, its best ally.
Trump's nominees are weird, say elites. But it was the elites' weird ideas that caused wars, addiction/OD crisis, Covid lockdowns, trans madness, censorship, and worse. Trump's nominees trigger the covert narcissism of elites who are rightly defensive at their appalling record.
Democrats act like they’re starting to get it, but they’re not. Their problems are all much worse than they realize. It’s not just that the Party is leaderless. It’s that the Party and the establishment institutions upon which it relies are discredited with half the country and are about to become more discredited with even more Americans as the truth fully comes out about censorship, Covid, weaponization of government, the transgender medical mistreatment scandal, and much else that the media and elites have lied about over the last 20 years. The media isn’t what people thought it was. It was never a reflection of reality. It was a reality distortion machine and propaganda industry in service of maintaining the narrow interests and power of a tiny group of decadent and psychologically disordered elites and their deeply deformed, dishonest institutions. Some might be reformed but others are too far gone to be saved.
The media says Trump's nominees are dangerous, but they're not. Their positions and priorities are well within the mainstream. The threat they pose isn't to the American people, it's to the pathocrats who created and worsened our border, public health, and foreign policy crises.
Over the last few years, the American people have come to believe that our establishment institutions are at least partly responsible for a series of self-inflicted wounds. Our health and medical establishment either failed to address or enabled declining life expectancy, a mental health crisis including an addiction epidemic, and a botched response to Covid. Our military and foreign policy establishment unnecessarily started and prolonged war and conflict in the Middle East and violated civil liberties at home in the name of fighting terrorism. And liberalized migration laws have depressed working-class wages, swamped the ability of cities to absorb the new migrants, and created a humanitarian disaster on the border.
Given all of that, the President-elect Donald Trump’s nominations make sense. As Border Czar, Thomas Homan will take strong action to close the southern border and deport criminals. National Director of Intelligence nominee Tulsi Gabbard will bring greater skepticism to foreign military entanglements and calls to restrict civil liberties for national security. And Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. will stand up to the corporations that most everyone agrees have put self-interest before the public’s interest on everything from drug safety to food quality.
We shouldn’t be surprised that some of them hold views that many of us disagree with. The main criticism of Trump’s nominees is that they have dangerous and fringe views. Homan said he would deport whole families. Gabbard said the Russian-backed Syrian dictator was not America’s enemy. And Kennedy espouses marginal and unsubstantiated views on everything from nuclear power to 5Gs.
But Homan has made clear his focus will be on deporting criminals, not families, whatever one thinks of Gabbard’s position on the Syrian conflict, it’s obvious from the context that she made her remarks in service of her loyalty to the US, not Russia, and Kennedy has said, repeatedly, that he won’t ban vaccines.
And throughout history, most real reformers and innovators have held fringe views and have had aspects of their personalities that are problematic. In most cases, those flaws or idiosyncrasies proved to be a small price to pay for their willingness to overcome the many obstacles required to achieve serious reforms of deeply entrenched institutions. This is true not just of Homan, Gabbard, and Kennedy, but also of Defense Secretary and Attorney General nominees, Pete Hegseth and Matt Gaetz, respectively. The accusations the media has made against the two men are so far unsubstantiated by the available evidence.
And none of the allegedly wrong views or bad deeds of Trump’s nominees outweigh the potential of the nominees to reform the institutions that are directly responsible for the invasion of Iraq, prolonged occupation of Afghanistan, entanglement in foreign conflicts, corporate capture of the FDA, the weaponization of government, Covid school closures, authoritarian and gratuitous Covid vaccine mandates, unhealthy diets, the addiction crisis that kills 100,000 Americans per year, the humanitarian disaster along the border, and the mistreatment of children with pseudoscientific transgender medicine.
Strong leaders committed to reforming America’s military and foreign policy establishment, its public health, food, and medical establishments, and its immigration and border security establishment are precisely what the American people wanted when they voted for Trump. If those nominees pursue destructive agendas in lieu of doing their jobs, we will be the first to call them out for it. But the establishment has no ground on which to stand...
Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning reporting, read the rest of the article, and watch the rest of the video!
Over the last decade, Democrats & the media said that those of us who opposed DEI, racial quotas, and open borders had gone “far right.” We hadn’t. Rather, Democrats and the media had gone far left. We are only now emerging from 10+ years of extreme, psychopathic gaslighting.
Make no mistake: it was the mainstream news media that induced the mass psychosis that radicalized Democrats into believing that the US had somehow become *more* racist, against all available evidence.
The media did this. The mass brainwashing came from college-educated elites in control of the most powerful propaganda machine in world history. They got Democrats to believe the ludicrous view that their fellow Americans had somehow become secretly racist, practically overnight.