We document the growth of big tech censorship & explain why Johnson's Online Safety Bill could be the greatest threat to free speech in the UK in living memory.
Far from “reigning in” social media companies, the Government is seeking a share of the extraordinary power to monitor, suppress + censor lawful speech on a scale never seen before.
The Online Safety Bill is disastrous for the future of free speech in the UK.
The Bill gives state backing to foreign companies' terms + conditions, abandoning legal speech standards.
This convergence of big tech + state power is unaccountable & difficult to contain. Once we go down the Orwellian road of online speech control, there will be no going back.
Our report documents how big tech's corporate speech standards often disadvantage the marginalised groups they claim to protect.
And as the Online Safety Bill will force companies to suppress even more lawful speech that could be 'harmful', deeper marginalisation is inevitable.
On Instagram, photos of users who have self-harm or surgery scars are routinely hidden and labelled as “sensitive content” that people may find “disturbing”.
The company is routinely erasing young people who have experienced mental ill health and trans people in particular.
Facebook's gender policy has resulted in account suspensions for jokes and off-hand comments, including of a gay man who joked "men are the worst".
Whilst Twitter's gender policy has resulted in multiple women being suspended for posting the legal definition of rape.
Twitter's misgendering policy is well-intended but deeply flawed, open to abuse & has led to undue censorship of women + trans people.
It has even been used many times to suspend users for using the word 'cis'.
@ZubyMusic + others have been suspended for using the word 'dude'.
Silicon Valley's speech standards, detached from rights standards, are increasingly having political influence - sometimes overtly.
Twitter recently removed the “Kill the Bill” account, which opposes #PolicingBill. Only after we complained to Twitter was the account reinstated.
Now, online speech controls are cast over public health discussions at a mass scale.
This has already led to Ofcom-regulated broadcaster @talkRADIO being removed from YouTube, scientists censored for sharing research, and an award-winning journalist's article marked as "false".
Automated censorship is deeply flawed and can have significant political impact.
Instagram labelled MP @zarahsultana's accurate post about pandemic deaths as "false".
It also labelled @BerniceKing's post about the assassination of her father MLK as vaccine misinformation.
The rule of law must be upheld online. But the Online Safety Bill does absolutely nothing to help police deal with real crime online, rather focusing the lens on ordinary people’s lawful conversations.
The Government MUST remove powers over lawful speech from the Bill altogether
Help us #SaveOnlineSpeech - subscribe for our campaign updates and action alerts:
🔴LIVE COVERAGE | Starmer’s Checkpoint Britain: How digital ID threatens our rights
The Government wants to introduce a national mandatory digital ID scheme that would make us all reliant on a digital pass to go about our daily lives.
Since the announcement, politicians from every single party elected in Parliament have spoken out against these plans.
Even the former ID cards minister, now Mayor of Manchester, Andy Burnham, has rejected digital ID, saying, “not now”.
Today, we're in Manchester hosting a vital discussion during #CPC25 on the serious risks posed by digital ID to our rights and freedoms
Follow for updates🧵
👁️"With digital ID, we risk sleepwalking into a system of constant surveillance of data
I've just come back from Estonia [where there is digital ID] and there's an ongoing joke...that if you run out of toilet paper, you don't need to call room service; they'll just hear you
There's a different culture of surveillance there."
Our legal and policy officer, Jasleen Chaggar, opens the discussion explaining why British policymakers should be wary of international digital ID comparisons.
"I am with free Britain, I have the right to be here",
@DavidDavisMP recalls the history of ID cards in Britain.
From WWII IDs, to Blair-era ID cards introduced in the wake of 9/11 and vaccine passports in 2021, the British public has repeatedly and successfully fought against identity card schemes.
We must fight plans for a mandatory digital ID, too.
👁️The Government is planning to CRACK DOWN even more on free speech in Britain by seeking to restrict repeat protests
"The freedom to protest has never been a right only to be exercised where and when it’s convenient to those in power, but precisely the opposite.
It’s one of the most essential tools the public has hold power to account.
Repeated demonstrations have long been tools for change in our country, from women’s rights to workers’ rights.
For the government to mount this new attack on protest at a time when many thousands of people on the right and left of politics are exercising their freedom to assemble appears like a cynical attempt to suppress dissent.
We urge parliamentarians to protect Britain’s ancient tradition of free speech and reject this chilling, cumulative attack on our right to protest.”
- Silkie Carlo [@silkiecarlo]
We've long defended the right to protest in Britain
We defeated draconian plans to ankle-tag campaigners that would have attacked and extreme police powers during the pandemic
🔴LIVE COVERAGE | Labour’s Checkpoint Britain: How Digital ID threatens our rights
Since the 1950s, every government attempt to introduce mandatory ID cards has been resolutely rejected by the British public.
We're now on the brink of a multi-billion-pound, national mandatory digital ID scheme that would make us all reliant on a digital pass to go about our daily lives.
We must reject this too - that is why we've convened a panel of experts today at our event during #Lab25
Follow for updates🧵
🪪"Digital ID was NOT in Labour's manifesto, and ministers promised there were no plans to introduce a digital ID. The landscape has now shifted dramatically.
There is no guarantee that the government would not make digital ID a requirement to access a range of public and private services...including the NHS and even online voting"
Our legal and policy officer, Jasleen Chaggar, opens the discussion.
🔔"Making this announcement outside of parliament without any consultation with MPs is WRONG.
We have to go back and debate about this"
@DawnButlerBrent reminds us that no one voted for a digital ID scheme and the government has no clear mandate to implement one.
🚨BREAKING: The Met Police's use of live facial recognition is UNLAWFUL - the UK's human rights regulator believes
Today we can reveal to you that the EHRC will intervene in a landmark legal challenge to #StopFacialRecognition brought by our director @silkiecarlo & Shaun Thompson, a Londoner who was falsely flagged as a criminal by this tech.
"The Equality and Human Rights Commission’s intervention in this landmark legal challenge is hugely welcome, necessary, and incredibly timely.
The rapid proliferation of invasive live facial recognition technology without any legislation governing its use is one of the most pressing human rights concerns in the UK today...
Given this crucial ongoing legal action, the Home Office and police’s investment in this dangerous and discriminatory technology is wholly inappropriate and must stop.”
– Rebecca Vincent, Interim Director [@rebecca_vincent]
No other democracy in the world spies on its population with live facial recognition in such a cavalier and chilling way.
Help us urgently #StopFacialRecognition - our fundamental rights are at stake.
💥NEW: We’ve obtained fresh documents that reveal the number of facial recognition searches of the passport database SURGED from just 2 in 2020 to 417 in 2023.
This means that the Government is allowing police to search over 58 million photographs.
Nobody signed up for this.
"This astonishing revelation shows both our privacy and democracy are at risk from secretive AI policing, and that members of the public are now subject to the inevitable risk of misidentifications and injustice.
Police officers can secretly take photos from protests, social media, or indeed anywhere and seek to identify members of the public without suspecting us of having committed any crime.
This is an historic breach of the right to privacy in Britain that must end. We’ve taken this legal action to defend the rights of tens of millions of innocent people in Britain" - @silkiecarlo