We document the growth of big tech censorship & explain why Johnson's Online Safety Bill could be the greatest threat to free speech in the UK in living memory.
Far from “reigning in” social media companies, the Government is seeking a share of the extraordinary power to monitor, suppress + censor lawful speech on a scale never seen before.
The Online Safety Bill is disastrous for the future of free speech in the UK.
The Bill gives state backing to foreign companies' terms + conditions, abandoning legal speech standards.
This convergence of big tech + state power is unaccountable & difficult to contain. Once we go down the Orwellian road of online speech control, there will be no going back.
Our report documents how big tech's corporate speech standards often disadvantage the marginalised groups they claim to protect.
And as the Online Safety Bill will force companies to suppress even more lawful speech that could be 'harmful', deeper marginalisation is inevitable.
On Instagram, photos of users who have self-harm or surgery scars are routinely hidden and labelled as “sensitive content” that people may find “disturbing”.
The company is routinely erasing young people who have experienced mental ill health and trans people in particular.
Facebook's gender policy has resulted in account suspensions for jokes and off-hand comments, including of a gay man who joked "men are the worst".
Whilst Twitter's gender policy has resulted in multiple women being suspended for posting the legal definition of rape.
Twitter's misgendering policy is well-intended but deeply flawed, open to abuse & has led to undue censorship of women + trans people.
It has even been used many times to suspend users for using the word 'cis'.
@ZubyMusic + others have been suspended for using the word 'dude'.
Silicon Valley's speech standards, detached from rights standards, are increasingly having political influence - sometimes overtly.
Twitter recently removed the “Kill the Bill” account, which opposes #PolicingBill. Only after we complained to Twitter was the account reinstated.
Now, online speech controls are cast over public health discussions at a mass scale.
This has already led to Ofcom-regulated broadcaster @talkRADIO being removed from YouTube, scientists censored for sharing research, and an award-winning journalist's article marked as "false".
Automated censorship is deeply flawed and can have significant political impact.
Instagram labelled MP @zarahsultana's accurate post about pandemic deaths as "false".
It also labelled @BerniceKing's post about the assassination of her father MLK as vaccine misinformation.
The rule of law must be upheld online. But the Online Safety Bill does absolutely nothing to help police deal with real crime online, rather focusing the lens on ordinary people’s lawful conversations.
The Government MUST remove powers over lawful speech from the Bill altogether
Help us #SaveOnlineSpeech - subscribe for our campaign updates and action alerts:
🚨BREAKING: The Met Police's use of live facial recognition is UNLAWFUL - the UK's human rights regulator believes
Today we can reveal to you that the EHRC will intervene in a landmark legal challenge to #StopFacialRecognition brought by our director @silkiecarlo & Shaun Thompson, a Londoner who was falsely flagged as a criminal by this tech.
"The Equality and Human Rights Commission’s intervention in this landmark legal challenge is hugely welcome, necessary, and incredibly timely.
The rapid proliferation of invasive live facial recognition technology without any legislation governing its use is one of the most pressing human rights concerns in the UK today...
Given this crucial ongoing legal action, the Home Office and police’s investment in this dangerous and discriminatory technology is wholly inappropriate and must stop.”
– Rebecca Vincent, Interim Director [@rebecca_vincent]
No other democracy in the world spies on its population with live facial recognition in such a cavalier and chilling way.
Help us urgently #StopFacialRecognition - our fundamental rights are at stake.
💥NEW: We’ve obtained fresh documents that reveal the number of facial recognition searches of the passport database SURGED from just 2 in 2020 to 417 in 2023.
This means that the Government is allowing police to search over 58 million photographs.
Nobody signed up for this.
"This astonishing revelation shows both our privacy and democracy are at risk from secretive AI policing, and that members of the public are now subject to the inevitable risk of misidentifications and injustice.
Police officers can secretly take photos from protests, social media, or indeed anywhere and seek to identify members of the public without suspecting us of having committed any crime.
This is an historic breach of the right to privacy in Britain that must end. We’ve taken this legal action to defend the rights of tens of millions of innocent people in Britain" - @silkiecarlo
Iceland's rollout of facial recognition is chilling ❄️
Thousands of people will have their privacy rights violated just to buy basic necessities, and Iceland will turn its shoppers into suspects, making them submit to a biometric identity check as part of their daily lives.
Just last week we saw @Facewatch embroiled in a scandal when its dystopian tech was used to falsely accuse a woman of shoplifting, and throw her out of the store.
@icelandrichard should abandon this rollout and put its customers' privacy first, and the government must act to rein in the uncheck expansion of this intrusive technology.
#StopIcelandSpying
The technology is provided by @Facewatch, a company whose system was linked to the wrongful accusation and ejection of a mum from a Home Bargains store earlier this month
@Facewatch Facewatch has also been investigated by the UK data watchdog, the Information Commissioner, who concluded last year that the firm had breached data protection laws on 8 different counts.
🔴LIVE from Parliament: We're now launching our pioneering report, Big Bank is Watching You: Preserving Privacy Amid the Rise of #CBDCs
Follow for updates ⤵️
"A #CBDC would mark a profound shift in our relationship to the state because they have the potential for the Government to insert into every transaction we make"
Jasleen Chaggar, our legal and policy officer and a co-author of this report, opens the discussion
"A #CBDC is a solution in search of a problem"
@DominicCaddick, co-author of the report and an economist at @NEF echoes the conclusion drawn by The Economic Affairs Committee
🚨LIVE: Powers to spy on ALL of our bank accounts buried in the the Government’s Fraud, Error & Recovery Bill are being debated in Parliament now
These powers aimed at Britain's poorest will impact all of us, taking away our financial privacy & freedom
🧵FOLLOW BELOW 🧵
“The #Horizon scandal is a very recent reminder of how computer systems don’t always get it right”
@Helen_Whately brings up the Horizon scandal & questions how much the plans will cost banks. However, she says Conservative Party is broadly in favour of the intrusive powers as a continuation of their own policies.
"Last June an AI algorithm, incorrectly identified people that were potentially behaving fraudulently"
@Debbie_abrahams brings up similar recent examples of the dangers these powers pose, adding "that is really serious"
🔴11 years ago, @Snowden blew the whistle on mass surveillance.
UK intelligence agency GCHQ had spied on millions of Britons - with aid from the US National Security Agency
What surveillance operations did Snowden expose & where do we stand today? 🧵
👁️ Snowden blew the whistle on GCHQ's operation OPTIC NERVE
Britain's intelligence headquarters intercepted & stored webcam images from Yahoo chats of millions of users to trial automated searches using facial recognition.
⚠️ Today, police are conducting facial recognition searches using our PASSPORT PHOTOS
Shops across the UK are also using facial recognition to spy on customers
This generalised mass surveillance of the population is reversing the presumption of innocence