1/6 🧵Now lets talk about the #$%! captured medical journals. High impact ones will ONLY publish studies that although they show benefit, don't meet statistical significance. Then they write stuff like "this does not support the use of IVM in COVID" jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/…
2/6 Meanwhile, so much unprecedented crazy shit has happened in journals to positive studies of IVM and other repurporsed drugs it is INSANE. First, know that in the FLCCC's over 100 year academic career (1500 papers), never has any been retracted after passing peer review..
3/6 Here we go:
1) Frontiers in pharmacology (funded by BMGF) retracted our paper... AFTER passing rigorous peer review
1a) They then retract other accepted repurposed drug papers.. editors quit en masse
2) Lancet Respiratory retracted Bryant meta-analysis..AFTER peer review
4/6 3) NEJM rejected Cadegiani's proxalutamide paper...AFTER passing rigorous peer review & holding it for a month
4) Eli Schwartz, researcher from a top university in Israel, did a sophisticated double blind RCT showing faster viral clearance with IVM & cant get it published
5/6
5) Shouman's RCT showing massive reductions in transmission within households treated with IVM.. reviewed then rejected by NEJM, Frontiers (again), and EMRO (the WHO's prestigious journal) after holding for a long time - another "tactic": delay, defer, deny
6/6 Another positive IVM prophylaxis trial held by JAMA for 2 months.. without sending out for peer review.. then returned with an apology. Delay defer deny
The high impact journals let you see the science Pharma wants you to see, not the science that is out there. Sad sad state

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pierre Kory, MD MPA

Pierre Kory, MD MPA Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PierreKory

Mar 15
Thread on New Variant: I have been getting a lot of questions about what some in the media are calling “Deltracron.” A more accurate name for the latest COVID variant is Ba.2 since it is clinically most similar to the Ba.1 Omicron variant (1/4)
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
We continue to learn more about Ba.2 and although the data is still being collected, this new variant does not appear to be more severe than Omicron. There is no reason for an elevated concern at this time (2/4)
Like other variants, Ba.2 accounts for many of the new COVID-19 cases and is currently present in approximately 35% of all COVID infections worldwide and at last count, only 3.5% of U.S cases. This trend is expected as the COVID-19 virus continues to mutate (3/4)
Read 4 tweets
Jan 10
THREAD: I wrote this substack last night pierrekory.substack.com/p/saturday-nig… and then woke up to this inspirational comment: "Without your phenomenal group at the FLCCC, your treatment guidance & protocols, & the morale boost acquired each time I zoom on wednesday evenings, I would.. (1/4)
be forced to exit healthcare. In 21 years of Emergency Medicine practice I have never been so despondent about humanity. Shift after shift I am ostracized, defamed and ridiculed for my unvaccinated status even though I maintain silence publicly. (2/4)
I know this is slightly off topic from your post, but you should know that we are listening…we are employing your protocols to help heal family and neighbors (as we are not allowed to do so in the hospital), we are pushing back on pharmacists who deny us. (3/4)
Read 4 tweets
Nov 11, 2021
Thread re: retraction of the FLCCC paper from the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
It is unfortunate that JICM retracted an entire paper based on their refusal to accept an update to 1 section of data that had little relevance to the focus or conclusions of the paper (1/8)
This was a comprehensive paper - 13 sections, nearly 200 scientific references detailing the science behind each MATH+ element of the 2020 protocol. The data in question was in 1 section and WAS ACCURATE when we originally submitted- i.e. a 6% COVID mortality at Sentara (2/8)
After peer-review & publication, a very unusual request came to us from JICM. Sentara Hospital asked the journal that the paper be updated with longer-term follow up data calculated differently (they never said our original data was inaccurate). (3/8)
Read 8 tweets
Sep 15, 2021
🧵How long can the Alphabet Agencies and Ivory Towers fight the massive & rising real world data of IVM rapidly stopping &/or preventing COVID surges? It's gonna be a looong walk back from that position man - I would be starting that $%&! walk now (1/5)

bit.ly/3hy80XF
2/5 - and Mexico City's Health Dept report of their early treatment program comparing the over 50,000 ppl treated with IVM and the over 70,000 who didn't... Massive 60-75% reduction in need for hospital, helping empty them over 6-12 weeks bit.ly/3liGuOM (2/5)
3/5 - and the Health Ministry of La Pampa, Argentina report on their IVM early Rx program which found 40% less hospitalization and 35% less ICU or death.. insane
bit.ly/3zg01o6 (3/5)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(