Today is the 15th anniversary of the “Regensburg Address” by Pope Benedict XVI.

One of the most important post-conciliar documents, it explains (1) Christ as Logos (2) the providential harmony of Greek wisdom & Hebrew faith and (3) the “dehellenization” of the West.

Quotes: Image
On the Logos, the Eternal Word, and “the intrinsic necessity of a rapprochement between Biblical faith and Greek inquiry.”

The coupling of Greek reason and Hebrew faith is an act of Providence. Image
“A profound encounter of faith and reason is taking place here, an encounter between genuine enlightenment and religion… Not to act ‘with logos’ is contrary to God's nature.

I’ve always thought “genuine” here is a shot fired. Image
God as Logos meant mankind must act and worship with logos and we built Christendom upon this truth.

Voluntarism was the forerunner to modernity, and modernity a rejection of God as Logos. Image
Yet, persons sought to “dehellenize” Christianity, to extricate Christianity from Greek influence.

The “Reformers” are the first stage, who create a historical fiction that a “pure” Hebrew faith exists - setting aside all historical fact for “sola scriptura.”

Bible > the Word Image
The second stage of “dehellenization” is liberal theology of the 19th and 20th century that rejected the Logos and subjected Christianity to modern, empirical reason.

Christianity and reason are reduced and true religion (and truth) becomes a personal interpretation. Image
The third stage of dehellenization is those who seek to play the role of Providence and re-inculturate the Gospel to synthesize it with a “new, modern” culture.

We seek to supply our own Logos, one in our own image.

This error is on parade on #CatholicTwitter. Image
Finally, he shows that in man’s pursuit of “reason,” man rejected Christ the Logos, the reason of all things, and in doing so both man and his reason are reduced.

"Not to act reasonably, not to act with logos, is contrary to the nature of God.” Image
Here is the address. It’s worth the read: vatican.va/content/benedi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dcn. Garlick, Chancellor 🇻🇦☕️🌳

Dcn. Garlick, Chancellor 🇻🇦☕️🌳 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HarrisonGarlic1

Aug 27
Today, we celebrate the Transverberation of St. Teresa of Avila.

"The sweetness caused by this intense pain is so extreme that one cannot possibly wish it to cease..."

Let's talk about eros, "erotic love," in Christianity without being puritanical or bourgeois: 1/9 🧵 ImageImage
Eros, erotic love, is a need-love, a self-love, an appetite for affirmation, fulfillment, and rest by satiating in beauty.

While the beauty of the lover and sex is often introductory, erotic love is actually a call to ascend toward greater beauties. 2/9 ImageImage
When eros is satisfied we are happy, we delight in beauty.

But we want to be happy all of the time, not just some of the time, and our finite beloved, a person, cannot satisfy our infinite erotic thirst. It is impossible.

We must ascend toward the higher beauties. 3/9 Image
Read 9 tweets
Aug 26
Is this still not the norm?

When I was in the diaconate, they flew in a seminary professor from a "conservative" seminary who taught us homiletics *exactly* like this.

His "great idea" was to give homilies in first-person as a character from the reading...
I think homiletics is quite difficult at the moment - especially as a deacon.

If your parish is habituated to hearing a narrative each week from the cleric's life, attempting to "break" that habit by doing something different is really agitating - no one has a palette for it.
My compromise was to open homilies with a narrative from a "great book," e.g., Homer, Sir Gawain, Dante, etc., and then tie that narrative into one memorable lesson from the Gospel.

My engagement with the parish rose a lot after that decision.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 18
How can we read the Bible like St. Thomas Aquinas & Dante? - A short thread (🧵)

In the 1300s, Dante wrote a letter to his patron saying you read the Comedy the same way the early Church read Scripture -- in four senses: literal, allegorical, moral, and anagogical. 1/6 ImageImage
The LITERAL is the historic sense, the intention of the author. Per Dante, the verse "When Israel went out of Egypt" would mean the historic deliverance by Moses.

The literal is foundational to all the other three senses, like the foundation of a home, if skewed, skews the rest. Image
The ALLEGORICAL means one thing may serve as a "type" for another, e.g., like mana being a "type" of Holy Eucharist, foreshadowing it (John 6).

Dante notes that Israel being delivered from Egypt by Moses is like us being delivered from sin by Christ. 3/6 ImageImage
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(