Thread – The Evolution of Xi’s CCP

The CCP under Xi Jinping has characteristics of Nazism, communism, modern “liberalism,” and several new adaptations the world has never seen in past totalitarian dictatorships. All of these could be observed during the COVID lockdown fraud. 1/
Like an organism, the goal of every regime is to survive, thrive, and expand. Every dictatorship has its own pathologies and methods for doing so, and new ones evolve over time. Under Xi, the CCP is doing these things very well, despite the nightmares it creates for the world. 2/
Like the Nazis, the CCP has many overtly racist policies, claiming to rule every ethnic Chinese person and purging minorities. Also, like the Nazis, the CCP focuses on seducing foreign elites to normalize its abuses and trade with it regardless. 3/
thehill.com/opinion/intern…
The CCP retains aspects of traditional communism, most notably the total disrespect for pre-existing traditions and property rights, as we saw with the immiseration of small businesses during the lockdown fraud. 4/
cnbc.com/2020/09/16/yel…
The CCP also makes use of modern wokeism to deflect criticism as “racist.” Eg, this is what allows for the question of whether the CCP’s Wuhan lockdown really eliminated COVID from all of China—but nowhere else—to be denounced as not just “anti-science,” but racist as well. 5/
Xi’s regime also has several new evolutions. Unlike Nazi Germany or the USSR, the CCP understands the value of international institutions, appreciating the bizarre trust the world places in these institutions even knowing they’re controlled by the CCP. 6/
Xi’s CCP specifically targets human rights organizations, understanding the importance and willingness of elites to redefine “human rights” in whatever way the regime sees fit. 7/
globaltimes.cn/content/120336…
One of the most impressive innovations of Xi’s CCP is the deliberate portrayal of itself as bumbling and uninfluential—when it’s anything but. I’m not aware of any regime that’s deliberately downplayed its own competence like this. It’s very Sun Tzu. 8/
In sum, the CCP is a highly-evolved regime that seduces elites, subverts global institutions, purges minorities while claiming criticism is “racist,” disregards tradition, redefines human rights, and deliberately downplays its own influence. Beware.
/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael P Senger

Michael P Senger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MichaelPSenger

15 Aug
This Time article is a decent history of China's takeover of the WHO. But don't be fooled: this article is very pro-lockdown, and therefore relies on countless improbable absurdities and boldfaced lies in order to gaslight the public. 1/
thetimes.co.uk/article/china-…
The entire premise is that the world should have locked down sooner and harder. Thus, the article repeats dozens of times that the WHO and China caused a "pandemic" that "killed millions," implying COVID is a supervirus with an enormous death rate, which it's obviously not. 2/
The idea that millions of lives could have been saved by locking down sooner and harder relies on the idea that lockdowns are real "science"—which they're not. The article misses the point of China and WHO's actual crime: turning lockdowns into science. 3/
ccpgloballockdownfraud.medium.com/the-chinese-co…
Read 7 tweets
1 Aug
1/ A quick, citable 🧵 of high-level public health authorities stating lockdowns are unprecedented prior to the CCP's lockdown of Wuhan in 2020.

This fact is frequently denied by lockdown fans, but public health authorities are extremely up-front about it among themselves.
2/ First, Neil Ferguson, aka Professor Lockdown:

“It’s a communist one party state, we said. We couldn’t get away with it in Europe…And then Italy did it. And we realised we could…If China had not done it, the year would have been very different.”
thetimes.co.uk/article/people…
3/ Second, "Gauden Galea, the WHO's China representative":

“Trying to contain a city of 11 million people is new to science…The lockdown of 11 million people is unprecedented in public health history.”
businessinsider.com/china-wuhan-co…
Read 10 tweets
24 Jun
Thread - FAQs

A thread full of my answers to frequent and interesting questions about the CCP's lockdown fraud, CCP influence and my work in general. 1/
Q: How many western leaders knew about COVID and lockdowns in advance?

I think very, very few. The whole fraud was about aligning global elites’ financial and egotistical self-interest with perpetuating lockdowns—turning them into CCP assets for all intents and purposes. 2/
Q: Could lockdowns have all been caused by groupthink?

It’s possible. There’s no question groupthink is responsible for 99% of this, but it’s hard to ignore the abundant evidence of CCP influence on the world’s lockdown policies. 3/
Read 25 tweets
8 Jun
Thread - Total Number of People in US and UK Killed by Lockdowns

This is a vital number, and difficult to come by. In this analysis, I've taken excess deaths by age in the US and UK and compared to excess deaths by age in Sweden to determine total killed by lockdowns.
The first step is to determine total excess deaths by age by country for 2020. This data is surprisingly hard to come by—obscured for political reasons—but it's available in the supplements to this recent BMJ Study.
doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1…

Supplements: bmj.com/content/bmj/su…
Next, since the population of the USA is about 32.1x that of Sweden, we multiply total excess deaths for each age group in Sweden by 32.1 to predict what excess deaths in the USA would have been without lockdown mandates.
Read 11 tweets
21 May
Thread

This article by Donald McNeil is solid confirmation of what many of us long suspected: national security agencies went along with lockdowns based on bad intel that COVID was a super-virus leaked from a lab.

THAT SAID, McNeil’s article is awful. 1/
donaldgmcneiljr1954.medium.com/how-i-learned-…
McNeil’s article is everything wrong with the lab leak investigation. First, as background, McNeil is the man who wrote the first @nytimes article urging the world to copy China’s lockdowns. He’s one of the most responsible for shutting down the world. 2/
nytimes.com/2020/02/28/sun…
The first thing to note is that McNeil’s article, and the lab leak theory, are being wholly endorsed by Peter Hotez and other lockdown fanatics. Hotez wrote in Nature Magazine advocating treating vaccine resisters as terrorists.

Not good people. 3/
Read 15 tweets
20 May
And yet again, Leana Wen, who immigrated to the USA from China under political asylum—famous for her video advocating ongoing lockdowns solely as a "carrot" to promote vaccine uptake—continues encouraging totalitarian vaccine verification measures.
Exhibit D: Leana Wen endorses the CCP's favorite conflation of the Chinese Communist Party with China, and even Asia itself—crucial to the CCP's ability to operate above the law.
Exhibit E: Leana Wen: "It needs to be hard for people to remain unvaccinated…Mandates by workplaces, by schools, I think it will be important to say…you have to sign these forms, have to get twice weekly testing…make getting vaccinated the easy choice."
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(