Adam Klasfeld Profile picture
Sep 14, 2021 7 tweets 2 min read Read on X
The California man arrested for allegedly bringing a machete and knives in his swastika-strewn truck near the DNC has an initial court appearance scheduled to begin soon.

ICYMI, from yesterday at @lawcrimenews. lawandcrime.com/high-profile/u…
Judge reiterates terms of remote access:

No audio or video rebroadcasting—or screenshots.
Court papers do not yet appear to be available on the public docket.
Note about arraignment court:

It is common for several cases to be heard before the one that attracts national media coverage.

This is a case in D.C. Superior Court.
Donald Craighead's case appears to be up now.

His lawyer waives a public reading of the charges, pleads not guilty on his behalf and requests his release.

The govt requests a hold and stay-away order for various locations around Washington, D.C., including the US Capitol.
Craighead's lawyer says: "Here, this is an allegation of a [possession]-only."

"Most of his history, with the exception one is instance, is not dangerous," she says.
Judge: "There is a prior assault charge that involved a weapon" about a year ago.

He orders Craighead to be held without bond.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

Apr 18
Good morning from New York.

We're seven sworn jurors into the process in Trump's criminal trial. Could we get the full 12-person panel today, save for the alternates?

Follow again for more voir dire, and see my chat with @Lawrence on Tuesday's session msnbc.com/the-last-word/…
First off:

On the first day, Justice Merchan read out a list of 41 names related to the case—not all witnesses.

For @Just_Security, @NormEisen spearheaded a breakdown of these names, with research from @JNKGoodman and me.

Bookmark this resource justsecurity.org/94696/trump-cr…
Trump has sat down at the defense table, more alert than we have seen him so far.

He appeared to be talking on his phone, until his attorney Todd Blanche made a cellphone gesture toward him, and he got off the phone.
Read 44 tweets
Apr 17
News

In Trump's NY criminal case, prosecutors file their so-called "Sandoval" notice—disclosing uncharged prior bad acts they intend to use at trial to impeach his credibility.

The list in the document rattles off the NYAG civil fraud case, the E. Jean Carroll case, and more. Image
"If the defendant chooses to testify, the People intend to inquire regarding the following"

Read the full list of litigation prosecutors intend to confront Trump with, if given the green light by the judge.

Doc 🔗 documentcloud.org/documents/2455…
Context

A Sandoval hearing establishes the permissible scope of cross-examination in order for the defendant to make an informed decision about whether to testify.

The notice shows that, for Trump, the list of prior bad acts, is quite long.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 16
The juror in seat No. 2 will be excused after Trump's lawyers discovered this post on social media:

“Good news!! Trump lost his battle on his unlawful travel ban!!! Get him out, and lock him up.”

(Punctuation marks recited into the record by Justice Merchan.)
Trump's legal team has been going down the list of jurors, one by one, and three jurors in, they have challenged every one for cause.

One challenged failed; one succeeded, and one is pending.
ADA Steinglass says that Team Trump's tactic of trolling potential jurors' social media accounts is a "conceptual problem."

Justice Merchan seems to agree, as Trump's third challenge is about an eight-year-old post by the juror's husband. (!)
Read 9 tweets
Apr 16
Good morning from New York.

We're gearing up for the second day of jury selection in Trump's criminal case in New York. Some nine jurors passed through the initial screening round, though none are empaneled, yet.

I'm reporting live from the courthouse every day. Follow here.
Per pool at 8:34 a.m. ET:

"Motorcade is on the move."
For my written reporting:

I will periodically fire off quick dispatches, and longer analytical pieces, on the trial for @Just_Security.

You can find the former category here. (Bookmark it!)

A more analytical dive here. justsecurity.org/daily-courtroo…
justsecurity.org/94560/trump-tr…
Read 35 tweets
Apr 15
Good morning from New York.

Jury selection is gearing up for Trump’s first criminal trial.

Lower Manhattan is a phalanx of metal barricades, and the largest press lines I have seen are outside the courthouse.

Follow here for the blow-by-blow throughout the proceedings.
There are all of two protesters in the park outside the courthouse, both carrying signs against Trump.

One sign says, “Convict Trump already,” on one side, and the other sign is a mock-TRUMP sign with the name replaced with “LOSER.”

No pro-Trump signs visible here, yet.
The press queues outside the courthouse for arraignment were quite long:

These seem larger, including among the two lines to get inside and the wall of cameras pointed at the facade of the building.
Read 68 tweets
Apr 10
Trump's attorneys are currently arguing AGAIN to delay his New York criminal trial at an appellate court — this time, on the immunity and other issues.

By the DA's count, that's more than 10 attempts to adjourn his trial.
One of the grounds cited by Trump's lawyer Emil Bove now:

Justice Merchan ordered that the parties must receive permission to file any more 11th hour pretrial motions.

Bove calls them "unacceptable and unconstitutional restrictions on our ability to file defense motions."
Bove pivots to the presidential immunity arguments.

He notes that Trump's argument here is "different" than the one in D.C.

"This argument is evidence of official acts cannot be offered at criminal trial against a former president."

Merchan rejected that theory, too.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(