There are some potentially crazy consequential secondary consequences for the Solana chain stopping for as long as it has, and could potentially get worse the longer it remains offline.

With all of the DeFi stuff being built out on Solana, there clearly could exist some crazy MEV/arbitrage opportunities the millisecond the network goes live again. Think of all of the DEX liquidity with now-stale prices on them.
The longer Solana is offline, the higher the chance for large price deviations everywhere. Juicy returns for the quickest transactors to arbitrage this away. But it gets even more interesting:
Any form of leveraged derivatives markets are now at risk of undercollateralization. Normally when the network is operating properly, all is good because there are some safety buffers put in place, oracles running, and liquidation incentivization.
However, once the Solana network restarts it's going to be a mad dash for the MEV actors to seek out the most profitable actions. What if the first, most profitable actions are draining the DEXes through arb, and *then* do liquidation?
Suddenly, there are position uncollateralized and subsequently will default. This means that even if you were a humble USDC depositor in a lending market, you may now only be entitled to a portion of that because there isn't enough to go around (80%? 90%? 50%?)
An additional thought to consider is that certainly all of the MEV experts have identified these opportunities and will do anything to pounce and collect the crazy one-time profits to be made upon network restart.
This may end up being another induced, naturally heavy transaction load in pursuit of the profits to be made. If the infrastructure isn't ready for it, it could just crash once again.
There is a potential "way out", but it isn't naturally altruistic yet. The relaunch of the network could be guarded, where only certain actors are whitelisted to transact. This could temporarily rate limit the system, and allow for DeFi things to unwind in a more orderly fashion.
However, this is also the position of a kingmaker. He who has the whitelist has gated opportunities to the profits to be made.
There isn't an easy, fair way to "reimburse" people for the pure DEX arbitrage opportunities that exist. So who is ultimately going to collect the outsized profits?

The Solana team has some work cut out for them.

h/t @dcfgod @0x_Osprey
Oops, said "consequential" and "consequences" basically back-to-back. I guess it does still communicate the gravity of the situation.
Wow... This blew up. Some additional context for people:

Generally speaking, the DEX arbitrage by itself isn't that big of a deal. Yeah it sucks that people can't exit their positions right now and will suffer a loss, but that was already a known risk.
The much more interesting secondary outcome is the "liveness assumption" of leveraged & lending markets was violated when the network went down. Yeah, the borrowers are at risk of liquidation, but now there's also risk to the lenders not being whole anymore.
This is because there's a chance that the liquidations will happen *after* the DEX prices have already moved to a massive extent. If a borrower collateralized $1m of WBTC, borrowed $800k before network failed, there's now risk that if the WBTC is worth $600k at restart, ...
There isn't enough WBTC to liquidate to make the lenders whole. Thus, even the lenders are at some level of risk right now due to default potential of the borrowers. The more that prices deviate at relaunch, the worse the risk gets.
Also, for anyone who might be thinking "all blockchain bad and must be regulated", there is a clear distinction between what has happened with Solana and other blockchains such as Bitcoin and Ethereum.
If you are a regulator, I *HIGHLY* recommend you contact experts like @coincenter to fully comprehend the technological nuances of blockchain and DeFi before moving to regulate.
I'll try to give it a go as a singular dumb person on the internet:
Solana's network halted in part due to it not being a sufficiently decentralized blockchain network at its current state. There are risks involved by participating in such networks that users should already know this before participating.
As built, DeFi smart contracts inherently operates as "code is law". This is *built in* to the technology. You simply cannot do anything that isn't already publicly displayed in the code. All of the rules are there, and the blockchain validators guarantee these rules are followed
Traditional finance operates based upon "trusting you to follow the law, and get punished if you don't do it". With smart contracts, the law is self-written in the contract with all rules available for all to see, and is autonomously verified and impossible to deviate from.
If you inspect the smart contract and then choose to utilize it, you are already aware of the rules and risks pertaining to utilizing it.
Another note:
If you are a *highly skilled* MEV operator, I ask you to consider a being a slightly altruistic actor by participating in the Solana relaunch (I havent heard details yet) and first moving to liquidate the at-risk leveraged positions, and then go about your arbitrage
I do not have any personal funds at stake with regards to Solana. However, it may help support the people who are participating in those lending markets in a more appropriate manner.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with ☄️⚡ (Hiring shadowy super coders)

☄️⚡ (Hiring shadowy super coders) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CometShock

13 Sep
Building out a RT thread for all the @RariCapital delegates posting about the $RGT mint for emissions vote. Time for us to build out a wide community with deep roots, and time for sustainable bullish emissions!
Don't be $FEI-ding the scale of Rari's $TRIBE! 🌲🏎️
The Rari community is being built with aligned incentives in mind!
Read 4 tweets
13 Sep
I’m super excited to announce myself as the manager for Alignment Engine’s delegation support of @RariCapital!…
As many of my earlier followers may know, I've been a big supporter of Rari Capital and the team for a while now. I can't wait to continue sharing my insight and participate in a more structured manner!
Within the announcement link above, you'll see a Values Platform that will be our guiding principles with which to evaluate proposals.
Read 7 tweets
1 Jun
A meta-thread compilation of some threads I've written, for those who are new to my profile:

Treasuries - The Underrated DeFi Protocol Fundamental
Weighted Net Token Metrics - A Potential New Class of DeFi Fundamental Metrics
Ruler x Rari Capital WETH Hedge Strategy
Read 7 tweets
21 May
Thought experiment: On a long enough time scale, do DeFi primitives with small/no moat trend towards no gov token fee extraction?

We are still somewhere in the experimental/refinement stages of most DeFi innovation, but eventually some primitives could incrementally refine & improve to the point of near-perfection & ossification. (Again, this is very long-term thinking vs where we're at atm.)
Once a protocol primitive ossifies like this, some impatient questions begin to arise:

What's the point of governance anymore? Maybe tweaking some minor parameters based on consensus & market conditions? Does governance really deserve any form of fee extraction for this?
Read 16 tweets
9 Apr
An assorted thread of DeFi data analytics problems I've been kicking around in an attempt to answer the general question:

What constitutes as actual healthy DeFi protocol fundamentals growth?
Apologies in advance for the very abstract, dense rhetoric that sounds like I'm going on some existential rant. This is very much a long string of thoughts - not a formal dissertation.

That said, I look forward to hearing thoughts from those who make it to the other side!
Something to keep in mind while sorting through this thread:

Maybe a lot comes down to how you define the difference between growth & adoption, or if they're intersecting sets, or if one is a subset of another. But even then, what points to the best, most reliable metric?
Read 22 tweets
8 Apr
Strategy alpha leak:

Right now using @RulerProtocol and @RariCapital, someone could lock in almost 40 WETH to:
-Maintain full upside exposure to 40 WETH
-Limit WETH downside to about -20% for the month of April (ATM)
-No liquidation risk
-Effectively no fees beyond gas!

How? 👇
Step 1: Deposit WETH into Sifu's Degen pool @RulerProtocol and borrow DAI, as seen in the image. Note the Annualized Interest Rate at ~21% for 40 WETH.
All of these interest rates lock in for you upon the borrow transaction, and you have no risk of liquidation as long as you pay back your loan before expiry (April 30th 00:00 UTC). If you fail to do this, you forfeit all of your collateral.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!