. Profile picture
Sep 15, 2021 11 tweets 4 min read Read on X
BREAKING: DC Federal Court sets hearing date and briefing schedule on legal challenge to Florida sports betting compact. Video hearing is scheduled for Nov. 5 at 10 AM EST. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment or preliminary injunction must be filed by Sept. 21. Image
Although the FL statute and compact provide for an Oct. 15 launch date for all sports betting, the reason for the later hearing date of Nov. 5 is based on the Tribe's representation that online sports betting will be implemented in Florida on November 15th (one month later). Image
Here's what prompted the seemingly out-of-nowhere hearing date and briefing schedule: West Flagler (the operator of Magic City Casino and Bonita Springs Poker Room) and the U.S. Dep't of Interior filed a joint motion yesterday requesting a briefing schedule and hearing date. Image
"The purpose of this joint motion is to propose a schedule for the Parties to present to the Court the purely legal issues in this case in a time frame that will allow for a decision on those issues by or before November 15, 2021." Image
From the Joint Motion:

"Plaintiffs argue that the Secretary’s deemed approval of the online sports betting portions of the Compact was contrary to law, arbitrary and capricious, and ultra vires because it allegedly contravenes and exceeds Defendants’ authority under IGRA." Image
Why the expedited hearing date:

"Plaintiffs contend that certain of their claims present questions of law that may be resolved without the need for production of the administrative record and that they are entitled to summary judgment on those claims."
West Flagler says it will be filing a motion for summary judgment and, in the alternative, a motion for preliminary injunction "no later than September 21, 2021." Likely uptick in PACER search fees that day. Image
"Further, Plaintiffs contend that they will sustain substantial irreparable harm if the online sports betting provision of the Compact is not preliminarily enjoined or permanently set aside prior to Nov. 15, 2021," when online sports betting is scheduled to become operational. Image
Here's the briefing schedule:

9/21 - Plaintiffs' MSJ and/or Motion for PI

10/12 - DOI response/cross-motion

10/19 - Plaintiffs' Reply Brief

10/26 - DOI Reply Brief on X-motion
Top lawyer name of the day: Image
FULL BRIEFING SCHEDULE: Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with .

. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PrograsiveXPlus

Nov 11, 2024
NEW: A California resident has sued sweepstakes casino operator VGW in Riverside County Superior Court, alleging that "Chumba Casino" is an "illegal gambling website." Plaintiff seeks a public injunction to force VGW to discontinue operations in CA.
The opening paragraph:

"Defendants are members of an offshore criminal enterprise that collectively owns and operates the website."
"In California, it is illegal to operate and offer online gambling casinos, including websites that offer slot machines, blackjack, roulette, and poker. Cal. Penal Code §§ 330 et seq. In this regard, California has a fundamental and deep-rooted public policy against gambling."
Read 19 tweets
Oct 23, 2024
.@AmericanGaming has called for a crackdown on sweepstakes casinos, asking State AGs and regulators to investigate these online platforms to determine whether they violate state gambling laws. I researched this issue in-depth, starting with California. It’s not a close call. 🧵 Image
Image
California is the most vulnerable state for sweepstakes casinos.

1) Bad case law on consideration

2) A ban on “gambling-themed” sweepstakes

3) A constitutionally enshrined public policy against casino gambling

4) Broad reach of gambling statutes

5) Payment processor exposure
So bad in fact that California should automatically be listed as the first “excluded state” in the T&Cs of every dual-currency sweepstakes casino and sportsbook operator. It’s that clear-cut.
Read 91 tweets
Dec 26, 2023
NEW: West Flagler has filed its reply brief in the Florida Supreme Court case challenging the state's online sports betting law on constitutional grounds. The brief highlights admissions made by the proponents of Amendment 3 that "casino gambling" includes sports betting. Image
West Flagler: During oral argument in the 2018 Florida Supreme Court case challenging the ballot language used in Amendment 3, "both proponents and opponents raised sports betting as an example of what 'casino gambling' captured": Image
West Flagler: "Likewise, opponents responded to Justice Pariente’s question about the effectiveness of Amendment 3 to authorize casino gambling, by arguing" that "sports betting" and "Internet gambling" are "perfect examples" of the types of games that are covered by Amendment 3: Image
Read 29 tweets
Jun 30, 2023
BREAKING: DC Circuit vacates the opinion of the district court in the Florida sports betting case and directs the district court to enter judgment in favor of the US Secretary of the Interior.
DC Circuit: “We see the case differently. IGRA “regulate[s] gaming on Indian lands, and nowhere else.” Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Cmty., 572 U.S. 782, 795 (2014). Thus, to be sure, an IGRA gaming compact can legally authorize a tribe to conduct gaming only on its own lands. But… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
DC Circuit: “The District Court erred by reading into the Compact a legal effect it does not (and cannot) have, namely, independently authorizing betting by patrons located outside of the Tribe’s lands. Rather, the Compact itself authorizes only the betting that occurs on the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Read 10 tweets
May 22, 2023
Meet Tarciana C. Rodriguez, the administratrix of the Estate of Severino Garcia Santa Romana. She signed the bank drafts totaling $5.1 billion that Brian Davis (per his lawsuit) delivered to Bank of America for deposit in Urban Echo’s bank account: bit.ly/3orL3Mr

Image
Image
The funding source for Brian Davis’ $7.1B Commanders bid?

The Estate of Severino Garcia Santa Romana.

That’s the issuer of the $5.1B bank drafts presented to BOA.

So, who is Mr. Santa Romana?

And why is his estate so interested in football?

I tried to piece it together.🧵
Who was Severino G. Santa Romana ?

— A Filipino-American commando who fought in the Philippines in World War II.

— He was also a CIA operative.

— He reportedly witnessed Imperial Japanese forces burying stolen war loot (gold) in caves and tunnels in the Philippines.

— The Japanese government intended to use that stolen loot to finance Japan’s war effort.

— The stolen gold was referred to as “Yamashita’s Gold,” named after Japanese general Tomoyuki Yamashita.

— Santa Romana allegedly tortured Yamashita’s driver Major Kojima Kashmiri to obtain the probable locations of the loot.

— Santa Romana recovered said gold and deposited it in Citibank.

— He then made the mistake of hiring a young Ferdinand Marcos (who later became President of the Philippines) to act as his attorney.

— Marcos, in his capacity as Santa Romania’s lawyer and chief trustee, used his limited power to attorney to gain control over Santa Romania’s gold and other assets.

— Nonetheless, large quantities of the gold held by Citibank remained in the account names of Severino Garcia Santa Romana and Jose Antonio Diaz de la Pas (the latter being an alias of Santa Romana).

— Santa Romana’s widow’s name is Liz Santa Romano. She was the primary heir as well as the original executor of the Estate of Severino Garcia Santa Romana.

— At the time of her death, the accounts allegedly contained 1.3 trillion dollars in gold and cash.

— The accounts remain in the name of the Estate.

Source material:





Read 4 tweets
May 6, 2023
If you believe that a 15-minute long chokehold on the NYC subway (that’s 900 seconds of asphyxiation) is a justified use of deadly force, you really need to read up on NY Penal Law 35.15.👇 ImageImage
Section 35.15 provides, in pertinent part, that a person may not use deadly physical force unless he “reasonably believes” that another person “is using or about to use deadly physical force” and that its use is “imminent.” Image
Further, deadly physical force may not be used if the individual, with complete safety as to himself and others, can avoid the necessity of such force by retreating. So there is a duty of retreat. ImageImage
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(