From Craig Murray blog January 2021:
“she [Sue Ruddick] expressed the sentiment that, if the police/Crown would specify the precise
evidence needed, she would get it for them…” craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/…
“she [Sue Ruddick] expressed the sentiment that, if the police/Crown would specify the precise
evidence needed, she would get it for them…” craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/…
2/ “There was no conspiracy, it’s a heap of nonsense…”
3/ “texts show a concerted effort by senior members of the SNP to encourage complaints. The messages suggest that SNP chief executive Peter Murrell co-ordinated [Sue] Ruddick and Ian McCann, the SNP’s compliance officer, in the handling of specific complainants.”
4/ “He or she starts their communication with the assertion that the evidence provided, and I quote, points to collusion, perjury, up to criminal conspiracy.” archive.today/BvJxC 
5/ “Mr Salmond further suggests the “highly relevant” documents could have influenced both court cases, and adds: “There seems to be no reasonable explanation for this apparent and flagrant violation of court direction, orders and search warrants”.” archive.today/Sc7bt
6/ “…he told me that Nicola Sturgeon had been behind the process designed to generate false accusations against him. He said as well as Mackinnon and Evans, Liz Lloyd was responsible for the actual orchestration.” archive.today/bcNZF
7/ No relief expressed that he was found innocent. No sympathy for the years of torment he endured. No warmth. Too busy with other things to even notice. Only concerned with having *her* say. Is anyone surprised by her silence about Joanna Cherry abuse?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
