ANTHRAX ELVIS --- Giuliani, Amerithrax, the National Enquirer, and the King of Rock and Roll. A thread.
In 1977, the National Enquirer paid Elvis's cousin $18,000 to snap a photo of the King in his coffin. The photo graced the cover of the tabloid in an issue that would go on to sell an astonishing 6.5 million copies.
This photo would also become fodder for innumerable "Elvis is Alive" theories, based on the supposedly impossible placement of his head, his unusually pudgy nose, etc.
The original photo was kept at the Boca Raton HQ of American Media, Inc. (AMI), the company that owned the Enquirer. It was valued at $1 million. In Oct. 2001, the HQ was the target of the first of a series of anthrax attacks, which would kill AMI photo editor Robert Stevens.
Media reports initially traced the anthrax to a strange love letter addressed to Jennifer Lopez, which contained a "soapy, powdery substance" and a cheap Star of David charm. However, the actual source of the anthrax remains undetermined. nbcnews.com/id/wbna3067576
At any rate, the anthrax caused the entire building to be shut down for years. Though valued at $10 million, it was sold to a real estate investor named David Rustine for a mere $40,000 in a deal that also stated he should destroy all personal property inside.
That property included AMI's massive archive, which, in addition to the famous Elvis Photo, contained some 5 million pictures. This would become the subject of contract disputes and a heated lawsuit. nypost.com/2005/08/17/rud…
Rustine contracted clean-up duties to a newly created company called BioONE, a joint venture between Sabre Technical Services (which had decontaminated anthrax-infected buildings in DC) and...Rudy Giuliani's company, Giuliani Partners. heraldtribune.com/article/LK/200…
But BioONE wasn't just cleaning the building, Rustine also agreed to lease it to BioONE for use as its new headquarters. As Boca Raton mayor Steve Abrams put it, "It used to be home of the National Enquirer and now it's the home of a national hero." nysun.com/new-york/giuli…
BioONE plan to fumigate the building with chlorine dioxide, a process that only took about 24 hours. But BioONE never took over the building and never got paid for its services. BioONE refused to release cleanup data. ph.ucla.edu/epi/bioter/for…
The source of the dispute was the photo archive. The photographers who took the pictures demanded to be given back their work. Lawsuits ensued. According to one suit, John Mason of Sabre/BioONE found the Elvis Photo and threatened to "lose" it unless his contract was extended.
Mason countersued, claiming he never made such a threat and that the Elvis Photo, along with the rest of the photo archive, was destroyed in accordance with Sabre's contract and *with the express assent of AMI*.
In fact, Mason's Answer/Counterclaim even attached a photo showing AMI's attorney, Daniel Rotstein, holding the Elvis Photo just before it was to be shredded.
Now, it's totally possible the photo wasn't actually shredded, and maybe what Rotstein is holding in that picture isn't even the original. What's important here is that AMI specifically authorized the total destruction of millions of photographs.
This is significant because AMI is widely known to be both a high-level extortion scheme and a "catch and kill" operation. David Pecker, who ran AMI from 1999-2020, has admitted a much.
e.g., during the 2016 election, Pecker—a close friend of Donald Trump—coordinated with Trump to buy up and suppress Playboy model Karen Macdougal's story of a sexual affair. theguardian.com/us-news/2018/d…
Pecker has admitted to keeping a safe full of dirt and hush money payments on Trump as well as damaging info on other celebs obtained by AMI with the intention of burying it. Employees of AMI said that this safe was "a great source of power for Pecker." courthousenews.com/national-enqui…
Knowing Pecker kept such tight control over his own safe of celebrity dirt, why did he so easily allow AMI's photo archive to be destroyed? Is it possible this was the entire reason AMI (acquired by Pecker just 2 years prior) was targeted in the first place?
In other words, did someone use anthrax to provide plausible cover for the destruction of decades' worth of dirt on all sorts of famous and powerful personages?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The pagers Israel exploded were made by Taiwanese company Gold Apollo. The pagers were reportedly imported 5 months ago (mid-April 2024), which lines up closely with a Knesset delegation visit to Taiwan during which Tsai pledged to "deepen" partnership between the 2 countries.
Gold Apollo denies involvement in the attacks, claiming sales & manufacturing of AR-924 pagers are handled by a Hungarian company, BAC Consulting. Gold Apollo president Hsu Ching-kuang further notes "strange" remittances that came through the Middle East. reuters.com/world/middle-e…
Hungary now denying that the pagers were ever in the country. The Hungarian government spokesman Zoltan Kovacs says BAC is only a middleman and has no manufacturing site in Hungary.
🧵Interesting moment from the Covid Select Subcommittee's interrogation of Peter Daszak I'd like to unpack.
Daszak claims DARPA didn't reject DEFUSE due to safety concerns but rather over its cost. (He's previously made this claim to The Intercept, but now does so under oath.)
Daszak says "the only information we received from DARPA about the reasons for turning us down" came during an exit interview. Daszak previously described this interview as an apparently voluntary process for those who didn't receive funding. theintercept.com/2022/03/11/cov…
This begs the question (previously raised by @Rossana38510044) as to whether the unsigned, undated DARPA rejection letter released by DRASTIC is completely authentic. And, if authentic, was it ever sent to EcoHealth or was it only a draft?
The talking point from lab-leak proponents is that DARPA rejected EcoHealth's DEFUSE proposal because it was too risky. (If you read the letter closely, it's not clear this is true.) However, in a March 2, 2018 meeting, DARPA reviewer Jim Gimlett did not raise any risk concerns.
Gimlett did, however, note that DARPA was not able to fund all proposals and may partially fund proposals or fund later stages of proposals. This gibes with the letter written (though not signed) by Gimlett which noted "several components" of DEFUSE were "potentially fundable."
Gimlett also noted in his 3/2/18 meeting with Daszak that one of the primary issues with DEFUSE was validation. Lack of validation was one of the reasons cited for rejecting DEFUSE.
Last month, @emilyakopp of @USRightToKnow published an article about the infamous DEFUSE proposal based on documents obtained from USGS, a DEFUSE partner. However, USRTK uploaded only a portion of those records.
@emilyakopp @USRightToKnow Scientist and natural-origin proponent @flodebarre also appears to have obtained the same cache of documents. She too has refused to publish the full batch, instead plucking out small excerpts in support of this thread:
I do not in any way agree with GoFundMe taking down the Grayzone's fundraiser, but, since I've yet to see anyone else mention it, I do think it's worth putting on the record that Max Blumenthal has reportedly agitated for such takedowns in the past. observer.com/2016/01/its-on…
The Observer article reports that Max "pressured" GoFundMe to remove a fundraiser by (virulently pro-Israel pseudo-rabbi) Shmuley Boteach to buy a NYT ad tying then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to Max via his dad, long-time Clinton consigliere Sidney Blumenthal.
However, the Observer's only apparent source is Boteach himself who merely said he "believes" Max contacted GoFundMe directly, just as he had written to Huffington Post editor Ryan Grim to decry an op-ed attacking him written by Boteach.
Two months after dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the US military began drafting a secret plan to nuke 20 Soviet Cities in a "prevenative" surprise attack without provocation or warning. https://t.co/0glssyr2Jparchive.org/details/isbn_0…
This plan, known as JIC 329 (or "Strategic Vulnerability of the USSR to a Limited Air Attack") acknowledged that the Soviets posed no immediate threat to the US. Decimated by WWII and lacking a navy, the USSR was in a dire position relative to the largely unscathed US military.
Knowing this, JIC 329 recommended a surprise barrage of nuclear strikes if it appeared that the Soviets "would eventually gain the capability of either attacking the US or rebuffing a US attack." (Kaku/Axelrod)