got a ton of books recently. usually i pick these up for very cheap (around a dollar). after a few threads, people have asked about why / if i actually read them. the answer is that i have a little library here at the studio and i pool things for inspiration. still setting it up:
so i pick up anything in my network of topics, and then later when im making images or jumping from one topic to another, i can just pull things off the shelf, hit the relevant chapters, thats basically how i work now. it lets me move through things in a natural way, u could say.
i usually hover somewhere in the vicinity of ‘not having much, if any, extra cash’ but last time wife and i counted we had around 1000 books. its way more now. sometimes i feel like im just building up the library so i have it.
ok let me show u the books i got.
i feel like i can call it a library because it has its own little nook in the studio btw. i am bragging now, about my humble attempt to amass a store of knowledge. ok now i will show you the haul from the last 2 / 3 excursions.
found these two together, they were with a bunch of books about ireland and scotland (did not obtain those). i like grabbing stuff like this that feels like a text that would easily lend itself to quotes for images, image inspiration, etc:
right now the shelves are broken down into catholic / orthodox / protestant, though id like to break the prot stuff down by denomination. im also padding out my post reformation church history so had to grab these:
sometimes it is slightly random within my chosen domains, any classics i need ill get, anything that seems like i could get an image out of (second book), or anything that is a guide to one sub aspect of history, especially if it was written a while ago (first book):
this book here is generally seen as the first art history book. this guy knew a lot of the renaissance artists and just wrote about them. i think there is a story in here about raphael having a vision of mary that i have mentioned often. it also says he died from too much sex:
somewhere between my quest to understand and penetrate the essence of american christianity and my desire to collect aesthetic books is the reason i get these. evangelical and pentecostal stuff is on the list... soon. working my way up to it. also gotta find all the first set:
posted some of these when i found them but if u look at them, they really are interesting objects (although i dont get them just for that reason. or maybe thats just what i tell myself. the second pic will obviously be very useful for the operation here). and last one is classic:
i literally cant resist the 70s / 80s covers. look at this. these are cultural artifacts. (the satan one is from a previous haul). i actually just realized i bought the rapture book twice, once on a previous hunt.
ill get anything i find thats a comprehensive survey of a topic, or an intro, at least to see what that person or their denomination / field / background has to say about it. so the piles usually look something like this with a few gems mixed in:
its not like all the shelves here are just random books i find, but by having a healthy amount of this stuff, like i said, when i hit a topic like... history of the trinity, or something in genesis, then i can poke in and see what 5 - 12 different people have to say.
its a pretty serious time over here, as you can see (first pic. had the second one for a while but clearly theyre a pair). thank you for looking at the books i found. this is like three or four trips max. you can do it very cheaply. let me flex a little with this last one..
the average price i obtain these for is probably between 1 and 3 dollars. some of these were like 50 cents. to answer the obvious next question, you have to go to places where women are looking for old clothes and furniture. there are books there. usually on outskirts of city.
just remember if u start going out looking for old books you are under an obligation to also pick up the ones that are part of our material culture / that document views of history / things / events that will soon be overtly heretical or intentionally obscured. thats the trade
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
along the way in my research, people say there are journals found after mens deaths where they describe successfully turning metals into gold, and then mostly using the money to lay low, live comfortably, and give to charity. this has probably happened independently several times
the issue with alchemy at the time, at least in europe, was the procuring materials, equipment, hiding it, and the expense and time involved in inevitable failures. however once you had success (my opinion) you had no reason to reveal it. it would make you a type of slave.
in ‘refiner’s fire’ the author puts forth a model of a type of hermetic folk culture native to parts of europe and places descended from england - this involving alchemy, counterfeiting, and something like the celestial arts - basically magic, the stars, looking into stones, etc.
a large component of new age is a kind of neo-shamanism. this centers around connection to ancestors, or the land your ancestors came from. it also centers around alternative forms of healing, often via plants. easy to run the numbers on how this is presently politically parsed.
average new age person (who wouldnt identify this way obviously) is skeptical of institutions (often specific things like banking, media), government, normal medicine, historical narratives - “new age” itself could easily, perhaps best, be modeled a type of meta-conspiracy theory
it would be essentially impossible to be “new age” or anything downstream of it without also being open to what we call conspiracy theories. this excludes them from most forms of totally acceptable social or political views at this time, often to their own confusion (no offense).
recently, i was discussing with a friend if children's general aversion to killing animals was innate, or a modern phenomenon. his response was that it's completely modern: in fact, it's intentionally implanted as a social control mechanism.
[...]
if you distance people from the process of obtaining their food, which entails slaughter, it's easier to control them.
obviously, i have no way of knowing if this is true, but i find this interesting because: i have it. despite my ideology, i have the aversion and always have.
he's showing me pictures on his phone of him butchering a pig: all the organs, the skin, everything. i have no problem with this: actually, i think it's cool, and eat more meat than the average person. but i still feel the slight spiritual recoil. was it spontaneously generated?
one noticeable aspect of older media is that to “be political” for normal people usually just meant adopting a particular niche cause, something like “save tigers”, and to be have the now common level of awareness about day to day politicians and events made you a politics junkie
there was a time within recent memory where being the “political friend” just meant that you thought people shouldnt throw plastic into the ocean. that was it.
‘jesus camp’ (the movie) was only released in 2006. notably in one segment a radio host, who is talking about politicized evangelical christians, says “these people aren’t politicos - they’re your friends and neighbors”. the idea of them “being political” was itself a novelty.
i was sitting in an office recently and looked down at a table of magazines. one had a decorated cake on the cover. i asked myself: is it real, or AI? all images will now be run through this hermeneutic. this is, literally, “dehumanizing”: to deprive of positive human qualities.
once again the AI image conversation should be steered away from “is it good or bad?”, “is it cool or lame?” (subjective, no way to prove these) towards: what does it mean? what does it do? but this angle is less explosively polarizing and more difficult to get attention with.
one time i worked at a traveling art exhibition. it was billed as art from egyptian tombs, but it was actually recreations of the art found in egyptian tombs. this was crazy unethical but i got the job via a long convoluted process accidentally, then quit.
zygmunt bauman (modern social theorist) says that the constantly shifting and unclear nature of our time period also applies to interpersonal relationships: no one is quite sure what it means, specifically, to be a parent, a grandparent, a friend, a coworker, and so on.
[…]
this sounds nonsensical at first - we can define all these terms easily: what a friend or grandparent is. but no one is clear on the obligations that these relationships entail, their day to day norms, what is expected, what assumptions are being made on either side: all unclear.
you see this a lot with present discussions about new parents looking to their parents to step into the role of grandparent. what does that look like, specifically? what is to be expected? this is a huge source of frustration and tension for many people, with no clear answer.