got a ton of books recently. usually i pick these up for very cheap (around a dollar). after a few threads, people have asked about why / if i actually read them. the answer is that i have a little library here at the studio and i pool things for inspiration. still setting it up:
so i pick up anything in my network of topics, and then later when im making images or jumping from one topic to another, i can just pull things off the shelf, hit the relevant chapters, thats basically how i work now. it lets me move through things in a natural way, u could say.
i usually hover somewhere in the vicinity of ‘not having much, if any, extra cash’ but last time wife and i counted we had around 1000 books. its way more now. sometimes i feel like im just building up the library so i have it.
ok let me show u the books i got.
i feel like i can call it a library because it has its own little nook in the studio btw. i am bragging now, about my humble attempt to amass a store of knowledge. ok now i will show you the haul from the last 2 / 3 excursions.
found these two together, they were with a bunch of books about ireland and scotland (did not obtain those). i like grabbing stuff like this that feels like a text that would easily lend itself to quotes for images, image inspiration, etc:
right now the shelves are broken down into catholic / orthodox / protestant, though id like to break the prot stuff down by denomination. im also padding out my post reformation church history so had to grab these:
sometimes it is slightly random within my chosen domains, any classics i need ill get, anything that seems like i could get an image out of (second book), or anything that is a guide to one sub aspect of history, especially if it was written a while ago (first book):
this book here is generally seen as the first art history book. this guy knew a lot of the renaissance artists and just wrote about them. i think there is a story in here about raphael having a vision of mary that i have mentioned often. it also says he died from too much sex:
somewhere between my quest to understand and penetrate the essence of american christianity and my desire to collect aesthetic books is the reason i get these. evangelical and pentecostal stuff is on the list... soon. working my way up to it. also gotta find all the first set:
posted some of these when i found them but if u look at them, they really are interesting objects (although i dont get them just for that reason. or maybe thats just what i tell myself. the second pic will obviously be very useful for the operation here). and last one is classic:
i literally cant resist the 70s / 80s covers. look at this. these are cultural artifacts. (the satan one is from a previous haul). i actually just realized i bought the rapture book twice, once on a previous hunt.
ill get anything i find thats a comprehensive survey of a topic, or an intro, at least to see what that person or their denomination / field / background has to say about it. so the piles usually look something like this with a few gems mixed in:
its not like all the shelves here are just random books i find, but by having a healthy amount of this stuff, like i said, when i hit a topic like... history of the trinity, or something in genesis, then i can poke in and see what 5 - 12 different people have to say.
its a pretty serious time over here, as you can see (first pic. had the second one for a while but clearly theyre a pair). thank you for looking at the books i found. this is like three or four trips max. you can do it very cheaply. let me flex a little with this last one..
the average price i obtain these for is probably between 1 and 3 dollars. some of these were like 50 cents. to answer the obvious next question, you have to go to places where women are looking for old clothes and furniture. there are books there. usually on outskirts of city.
just remember if u start going out looking for old books you are under an obligation to also pick up the ones that are part of our material culture / that document views of history / things / events that will soon be overtly heretical or intentionally obscured. thats the trade
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
i was sitting in an office recently and looked down at a table of magazines. one had a decorated cake on the cover. i asked myself: is it real, or AI? all images will now be run through this hermeneutic. this is, literally, “dehumanizing”: to deprive of positive human qualities.
once again the AI image conversation should be steered away from “is it good or bad?”, “is it cool or lame?” (subjective, no way to prove these) towards: what does it mean? what does it do? but this angle is less explosively polarizing and more difficult to get attention with.
one time i worked at a traveling art exhibition. it was billed as art from egyptian tombs, but it was actually recreations of the art found in egyptian tombs. this was crazy unethical but i got the job via a long convoluted process accidentally, then quit.
zygmunt bauman (modern social theorist) says that the constantly shifting and unclear nature of our time period also applies to interpersonal relationships: no one is quite sure what it means, specifically, to be a parent, a grandparent, a friend, a coworker, and so on.
[…]
this sounds nonsensical at first - we can define all these terms easily: what a friend or grandparent is. but no one is clear on the obligations that these relationships entail, their day to day norms, what is expected, what assumptions are being made on either side: all unclear.
you see this a lot with present discussions about new parents looking to their parents to step into the role of grandparent. what does that look like, specifically? what is to be expected? this is a huge source of frustration and tension for many people, with no clear answer.
photos instead of paintings (all this was later removed):
this is one of my favorite image parings to show people. in person when you swipe back and forth you can sometimes see it rewire something in their brain about america. same room in the white house, before and after:
it looks like the AI conversation is going to cement around “are artists are coping or not” but id like to submit a second option: that its worthy of skepticism that my broke friends are beholden to copyright laws that apparently don’t apply to tech people making a lot of money
the AI question really should be: are we doing wild west on copyright laws or not. if we are, okay - then that should apply to everyone. if we’re not - okay, then that should apply to everyone. everyone is basically arguing that now tech companies get to be the exception to them.
if my friends can get cease and desist letters for making fanart about a movie or franchise when money gets involved but a guy can also make a billion dollars feeding that movie and franchise into his image maker and selling access to it, i dont think its out of line to ask: what
one key aspect of postmodernism is that art styles are self-consciously deployed as pastiche. this means theyre just used as surface, for what they represent: they become interchangeable. these almost meaningless academic concepts will increasingly characterize your everyday life
when an entire artistic milieu is used just for what it represents, not what it actually is (this already happened a long time ago), the blowback is that it becomes impossible to genuinely use and engage with those milieus. you can’t decide to not be self aware of this process.
this is, in my opinion, the actual origin of what is called “stuck culture”. to start a “nu-metal” band would be referencing what “nu-metal” is. you and the audience would both know that you’re aware of this. that awareness is the source of the “block” - everything is self aware.
the 'people not having kids' trend: fascinating. people can do whatever. but as a larger trend, clearly something is up. likewise, when i ask the older generation why they all had kids, they don't know. they "just did"
so i looked up why non-human animals might not breed
[...]
one fascination i have with this topic is that it seems to be instinctual, thus the turn to animals. in my parents friend group, they all had kids around the same time. i (probably too much) grilled them about why they all did this and they all gave some version of "we just did"
that's "just what you did". okay. as though compelled by something beyond them. not religious, running the spectrum of affluence, no clear answer. likewise, despite the internet obsession with this, there's no clear answer. internet? maybe. politics? maybe. nothing great, imo.