One of the most stunning works surviving the Anglosaxon period, when England was Christianizing. It represents a synthesis and syncretism between English Heathenism, Christianity and Roman culture. It is evidently the work of a master craftsman and a rich culture. /THREAD
On the casket, we find the Three Magi at the Adoration of Christ, Wayland the Smith, Romulus and Remus, Titus’s conquest of Jerusalem, as well as Valkyries, Valknutr, and other references to Germanic myth throughout.
Rune means 'mystery', and they had both a symbolic and numerological value, as in Gematria and Kabbalah. The craftsman was extremely careful in his rune choices, thus in the first panel, that of the adoration, the text alliterates on Feoh (cattle, wealth) and Gifu (gift):
Feohgift (Feoh + Gifu) was a poetic term meaning treasure-giving. In the scene, we find both Wayland, the Smith of the Gods, and the Adoration of the Magi at the birth of Christ, presenting him with gifts. Wayland stands for wealth; the Magi, for gifts.
In the Romulus and Remus panel, instead of one wolf, there are two: as Woden’s two wolves Geri and Freki. There is no shepherd on a field, but four warriors in a holy grove accompanying the divine twins, who are not children, but men.
Their names are changed to Romwalus and Remwalus – WAL as in VALhalla and VALkyrie – they are heroic warriors and legendary founder twins, like those of the English: Hengist and Horsa.
Each panel depicts one stage or step of a warrior’s life: The Adoration = Birth, Romulus and Remus = Battle / Initiation, Titus = Triumph, Heroic Death, and Ascent to Walhall.
It is likely a model of Anglo-saxon cosmology – each panel depicting a trinity of Gods, with the lid representing Heaven, Valhalla.
The casket also represented the seasons and calendar:
The number of times the runes were throughout the whole poem were also considered, yielding further numerological and symbolic meanings:
It is a fascinating artefact, yielding such a variety of readings, allusions, doublings, etc. that one could study it for a lifetime - much too much to lay out in one thread. I might do some more later if there is interest.
worth reading Evola's take because Montessori has become the dominant way of thinking about education & learning - this is in part what led to and justifies all the 'open learning', 'flipped classroom' nonsense on one side, and 'we don't need no education' on the other
in the thread i mention Steiner schools, which, although nowadays falling victim to the same Montessorian way of thinking, are quite comfortable with things like rote learning, and see their role as impressing values, culture on the children, e.g.
it would probably be worth comparing something like the neo-classical approach, which is also gaining popularity. a lot of people here are interested in homeschooling - even and especially then, it is worth thinking about what education is.
Most people know Evola from his books, but he also wrote dozens if not hundreds of articles for a range of publications. Here he discusses Montessori education - he was actually at their conference in Fascist Italy, presided over by Mdm. Montessori herself.
As one of the two big 'alternative education' systems, Montessori is often lumped in with Steiner schools. But they are very different. See below on Steiner:
Montessori's background was psychology and medicine - she worked especially with children with learning difficulties. A true 'trailblazer', she left her illegitimate son in the care of a wetnurse to pursue her career.
The Seven Towers of Satan corresponding to Ursa Major
This is from a book (Les Sept Tours du Diable) by Jean-Marc Allemand where he takes up and develops something mentioned by Guenon in his review of W. S. Seabrook's 'Adventures in Arabia' and elsewhere.
Seabrook relates a legend from the Middle East about the Seven Towers of Satan, which control and direct the forces of evil in the world. Guenon describes one tower amongst the Yazidi as perhaps being the "tangible and localized base for a centre of counter-initiation."
*** Do we live in a gynaecocracy? ***
Evola introduction to Bachofen's 'Das Mutterrecht' (1949).
Bachofen describes an opposition in the classic & ancient Mediterranean world between civilizations w/ heroic, solar, virile spirituality and cthonic, lunar, feminine spirituality.
Evola describes such civilizations as 'telluric' (tellus = cthonos = earth). They consider the law of the earth the highest law; the Divine Woman embodies what is eternal and unchanging; all it produces has a birth and decline, a purely individual and fleeting life.
Wherever the supreme principle is understood as a Great Mother, the earthly woman, who appears as the closest incarnation thereof, comes to assume a religious dignity and the highest authority. She is the *giver of life*; man is only her instrument.
Everyone has heard of siestas - usually thought to be taken only due to the heat of the day - and nanna-naps, which are seen as a quirk of old age. Soldiers are also famous for kipping whenever they can. These are seen as deviations -- but...
In pre-industrial societies it was normal to have two sleeps - so normal, that people would casually refer to a 'first sleep' and a 'second sleep':