Google's FEC filing is in, and as always full of interest. On August 21, the company made a $1000 donation to Iowa rep Mariannette Miller-Meeks. Less than a month later, Miller-Meeks was here on Twitter spreading disinformation on vaccine policy (despite being a medical doctor)
The National Right to Life Committee gave West Virginia congressman David McKinley a 100% rating on abortion issues from 2011 to the present, and Google gave his campaign $2,500 on August 13.
On August 13, Google made a $5,000 donation to Abraham Lincoln PAC, twenty of whose 2020 recipients voted to overturn the results of the presidential election.
In December 2020, Georgia congressman Austin Scott signed an amicus brief in Texas vs. Pennsylvania, a lawsuit contesting the legitimacy of the presidential election. Google gave Scott's campaign $1,000 on August 13.
Texas representative Dan Crenshaw also signed that Texas vs. Pennsylvania amicus brief, falsely alleging that the Presidential election was stolen. Google gave his campaign $2,500 on August 13.
Michigan representative Bill Huizenga also signed the Texas vs. Pennsylvania amicus brief, alleging Biden stole the election. Google gave Huizenga's campaign $1000 on August 13.
Florida representative Michael Waltz similarly signed that Texas vs. Pennsylvania amicus brief, alleging a stolen election. Google gave his campaign $1000 on August 13. (I'm sorry this is getting repetitive, but Google gave political money to a lot of election deniers this month)
Michigan representative John Moolenaar signed on to the Texas vs. Pennsylvania amicus brief, attacking the legitimacy of the 2020 Presidential election. Google gave his campaign $1000 on August 13.
On August 13, Google made a $5,000 donation to Drew Ferguson's Point Action PAC. Of the seven people that PAC has donated to so far in 2020, three voted in December 2020 to overturn the results of the Presidential election.
Indiana Congressman Trey Hollingsworth also signed the Texas. vs. Pennsylvania amicus brief in an attempt to subvert the 2020 presidential election. Google gave him $1000 on August 13.
Another signer to the Texas. vs. Pennsylvania amicus brief contesting the 2020 presidential election result was Ohio congressman Brad Wenstrup. Google made a $2,500 donation to his campaign on August 13.
I list these donations at length because Google promised in January to not make any political donations to members of congress who voted to dispute the election. Instead, it's giving them money indirectly through PACs, and giving openly to those who tried to subvert it in court.
If you work at Google, change your status to "outraged" and keep beavering away at whatever it is you do to effect quiet change from within while your employer publicly humiliates you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lurking the r/generator subreddit recently I learned something interesting about the situation in Texas. Quite reasonably a lot of people in the Houston area have decided to get generators installed, since there have been recent major power outages both in summer and winter...
This being Texas, what most people want to run off their generator is a five-ton whole-house air conditioner. This as you can imagine is pretty power hungry, particularly when it first powers on. To avoid storing gas/diesel, a lot of people have opted for a natural gas hookup
Natural gas distribution in Texas is not set up to support hundreds of multi-kilowatt generators running at the same time, let alone firing up at the same time. So what people have collaboratively built in Texas is a system for converting power outages into massive gas outages.
The first time I voted in a US election I was amazed that no proof of citizenship—not even photo ID—was required. From the point of view of an immigrant, you're constantly made to prove your legal residency for stuff—jobs, school, driving—but for some reason not voting.
I don't really get why positive proof of ID isn't a voting requirement, other than the fact that voting law in the US is very old and predates the modern surveillance state. I don't have strong feelings about it, but it's definitely a US oddity, like the lack of national ID
From the point of view of public faith in elections, there does seem to be something rickety about the combination of trust-me voter registration requirements, absentee ballots, and mail-in votes getting counted for weeks after election day.
Cryptocurrency and generative AI make roughly the same size claims to being transformative innovations, so it's interesting to see how many interesting things people have already found to do with the latter, while the first has mostly been an expensive tour through human folly
I like thinking of cryptocurrency as "financial string theory", but for the parallel to really work a lot more physicists would need to be in jail
With both crypto and string theory, you have domain experts in thrall to a mathematical apparatus so intellectually satisfying that they get emotionally invested into bringing it into contact with reality. But instead each failed attempt pushes them further out into la-la-land
Rising from the crypt to talk a little about how pre-wikipedia generations lived. There was a big encyclopedia in the library, but only really rich families would own one. The best that poor kids could hope for was grocery store encyclopedias, bought one volume at a time
Grocery chains really would sell the world's saddest encyclopedia, one slim volume a week, and you felt lucky to have it. Unrestricted access to a full set of the Encyclopedia Britannica is the thing that felt most like having access to the world wide web in the pre-www days.
Naturally when the web came along, we all wondered how encyclopedias would work online, and for a brief while it looked like Microsoft would sell expensive access to a kind of crappy one. And then wikipedia appeared and blew everyone's mind by the fact that it worked
Early this year I went online after taking too many drugs and ordered a Mongolian yurt. Here is my yurt, and here is my story:
The great thing about yurts is you can get high, make a deposit, and forget you bought one for seven months. Then in late July I got email giving me an imminent delivery date and demanding to see a photo of the finished substructure. I tried to bluff them with a quick Lowe's run
The yurt company was totally on to me, though. Everyone lies about the substructure. Demands for photo evidence grew insistent, and I found myself having to level heavy things in the desert while getting heatstroke
This whole thread on large-scale circulation in the Atlantic Ocean is great, but the real showstopper is that global-warming induced breakdown in this flow will result in significant *cooling* for a large chunk of Eurasia, greatly complicating the politics of climate response.
The existing strategy for mitigating climate change is incoherent because:
1. It demands a total restructuring of societies worldwide 2. Most of this burden would fall on developing nations 3. It ignores imminent tipping points that (by definition) there is no coming back from
But with no politically achievable plan for capping (let alone reducing) global emissions, what will happen is we'll run into one of these tipping points, and if that happens to be AMOC collapse, then suddenly a bunch of G7 economies have much less incentive to decarbonize