Yesterday I posted a “hot take” on a new #BiblicalAchaeology paper claiming that #TallElHammam in the Jordan Valley is Biblical Sodom & was wiped out when a small comet or asteroid exploded over the city. This thread is to provide more background before I critique the content.
First, a correction. I said it was in Nature. It was in Scientific Reports. I learned about it from a colleague who wrote,“I suspect you've seen the recent Nature paper about the airburst in the Jordan Valley. I wonder if we could talk about it?” I failed due diligence.
On Feb 15, 2013, an asteroid blew up over the city of Chelyabinsk, Russia. Since I’d published models of airbursts and had identified them as the most significant asteroid threat, I was invited to travel to Russia for the Nova documentary “Meteor Strike”.
I’d already participated in a number of documentaries, including BBC’s beautifully filmed “Tutankhamun’s Fireball”, where I introduced the concept of contact airbursts, in which the high-temperature products of an asteroid explosion reach the surface.
The previous year I’d helped History Channel’s Universe series with “When Space Changed History.” Though less scientifically rigorous than Nova or BBC, it included a fun scene (19:25) in which we set off an explosive charge to show how impact craters form. dailymotion.com/video/x3l3gg2
After Chelyabinsk, asteroid airbursts became much more interesting to the scientific community. As the most visible researcher of the scientific cosmic curiosity I called “airbursts” I suddenly started getting lots of invitations.
I’d accepted invitations to give plenary lectures at two back-to-back scientific conferences in Denver, but as it happened there was a government shutdown that week. My employer, a national lab, suspended operations and banned employees from attending conferences.
So I took vacation, paid my own way, drove to Denver, stayed at my sister’s condo, and made good on my professional commitments. I also worked, off the clock, to get my simulation on the cover of an upcoming issue of @Nature (see image on 1st tweet). But I got behind on email.
Before I left I had gotten a message from the producers of History Channel’s Universe asking me if I’d help with a new episode called “Mysteries of Sodom and Gomorrah.” They told me it would feature archeologist Steve Collins' discovery of the ancient site of Tall el-Hammam.
According to the invitation, “He [Collins] has strong geographical evidence that links this site to the actual ancient city of Sodom. He will present his theory, and evidence, that the site might have been destroyed by an airburst impact..” This was early October, 2013.
"..I don't know if you're familiar with his work but he mentions you in his recent book, Discovering the City of Sodom. Collins has excavated desert glass similar to what you found in Libya. He's also uncovered glazed Middle Bronze Age pottery fired at 14,000 F.."
".. hundreds of years before the art of glazing. He's found charred, hyperextended human bones in a 4-inch thick ash layer dating back to the time period. And he's even found a chunk of rock that might be a meteorite.”
I immediately forwarded the invitation to an archaeologist colleague, who got back to me the following week with extensive background research on Collins and his work. It was not pretty, and my response was “OMG! Thank you for saving me from making a big mistake..”
“.. I assumed this guy was an academic and legitimate archaeologist, but maybe had gotten into some fringe science. It didn't occur to me that he was coming at it from a Biblical fables perspective. Ironic that he is based in Albuquerque..”
“.. I looked at his website and the address he gives is 5600 Eubank NE. I drive past it every day but have never noticed anything but strip malls and office rentals in that area… I'm having nothing to do with this..” (note, TSU has moved at least once since 2013)
“..You did a lot of work! I think that before I decline to participate I will ask the documentary producer for peer-reviewed published papers on the subject. It might be worth finding out more and if there are no legitimate sources it could be a teaching moment..”
Then to the producer: “I would be very interested in learning more about the evidence for an airburst in Jordon. Do you have any peer-reviewed publications by Dr. Collins that describes this research? Can you scan the relevant parts of the book and send to me, or have him send?”
They sent me some non-peer-reviewed links, but a couple weeks later told me that Collins had backed out of participation, saying “Collins now says he doesn't have the time to be interviewed for our show, and would be more interested if we were producing for PBS or NOVA.”
I responded: “My colleague tells me that the two authors mentioned are not really unbiased. This entire field of Biblical archeology is fraught with problems. See this, for example: world.time.com/2013/01/29/a-f…
“..It is worth noting that pottery shards from Sodom and Gomorrah would have a much greater market value than shards from some random unidentified site. The History Channel needs to know what it's getting itself into. I suspect they will back out if they start digging deeper.”
But they went ahead with it. Here’s the link. Out of dozens of invitations to appear in documentaries, this is the only one I have declined (at least that I remember). dailymotion.com/video/x1k4f1j
I immediately forwarded the invitation to an archaeologist colleague, who got back to me the following week with extensive background research on Collins and his work. It was not pretty, and my response was “OMG! Thank you for saving me from making a big mistake..”
“.. I looked at his website and the address he gives is 5600 Eubank NE. I drive past it every day but have never noticed anything but strip malls and office rentals in that area… I'm having nothing to do with this..” (note, TSU has moved at least once since 2013)
“..You did a lot of work! I think that before I decline to participate I will ask the documentary producer for peer-reviewed published papers on the subject. It might be worth finding out more and if there are no legitimate sources it could be a teaching moment..”
Then to the producer: “I would be very interested in learning more about the evidence for an airburst in Jordon. Do you have any peer-reviewed publications by Dr. Collins that describes this research? Can you scan the relevant parts of the book and send to me, or have him send?”
They sent me some non-peer-reviewed links, but a couple weeks later told me that Collins had backed out of participation, saying “Collins now says he doesn't have the time to be interviewed for our show, and would be more interested if we were producing for PBS or NOVA.”
I responded: “My colleague tells me that the two authors mentioned are not really unbiased. This entire field of Biblical archeology is fraught with problems. See this, for example: world.time.com/2013/01/29/a-f… "
“..It is worth noting that pottery shards from Sodom and Gomorrah would have a much greater market value than shards from some random unidentified site. The History Channel needs to know what it's getting itself into. I suspect they will back out if they start digging deeper.”
But they went ahead with it. Here’s the link. Out of dozens of invitations to appear in documentaries, this is the only one I have declined (at least that I remember).
dailymotion.com/video/x1k4f1j

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Boslough boslough.bsky.social

Mark Boslough boslough.bsky.social Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarkBoslough

Mar 28, 2022
Today I'm going to talk about Example #8 in Allen West's formal "Explanation of Changes in Corrected Paper" (the controversial Bunch et al Sodom & Gomorrah was a comet airburst paper). The beginning of the discussion is here:
Here's the link to West's "Explanation" which invokes the word "cosmetic" 12 times. Perhaps the Comet Research Group needs to change the name of its blog to "Cosmetic Tusk" since it seems to focus on cosmetic appearances at the expense of science.
"For cosmetic reasons in Fig. 15b, we used a cloning tool to remove the partially visible N arrow and replaced it with a NE arrow."

In the published version the NE arrow pointed to the left of north and that would have been obvious if the N arrow hadn't been photoshopped out.
Read 17 tweets
Mar 28, 2022
I'm starting a new thread to discuss the Comet Research Group's explanation of their corrections to the Bunch et al (2021) Sodom & Gomorrah airburst paper, which used inappropriately modified (photoshopped) field photos. The first thread starts here:
"Example #3. The annotated Figure 44c of the skeleton (left panel below) was provided by official photographers of the Tall el-Hammam Excavation Project (TeHEP). It is listed below as the 'uncropped original,' because an unannotated original is not available."
Why were the authors of Bunch et al (2021) unable to get an original copy of this image, given that one of the coauthors is Director of Scientific Analysis and Field Supervisor at the Tall el-Hammam Excavation Project (TeHEP), when I was able to get a copy?
Read 13 tweets
Mar 27, 2022
The Comet Research Group has just released, through its Cosmic Tusk blog, an extended explanation for the manipulated images in the Bunch et al (2021) Sodom paper. I would like to give all my science friends a chance to analyze & comment on it here. cosmictusk.com/wp-content/upl…
According to the CRG's blogger & spokesman, "In an opaque request, elements of the mob petitioned Science Reports, claiming the photographs in the publication were fraudulent. The impact scientists immediately responded to the nuisance claim carefully and appropriately."
The request wasn't made by a "mob". It was made by 2021 Maddox Prize winning image forensics expert and scientific integrity advocate Elisabeth Bik, @microbiomdigest, in PubPeer. It was a series of requests, starting in September (the week after the paper was published).
Read 13 tweets
Feb 17, 2022
This weekend marks 5 months since publication of a deeply flawed paper claiming that the biblical city of Sodom was destroyed by a Tunguska sized airburst. It's under consideration for retraction due to inappropriate image tampering. Here's a chronology.
nature.com/articles/s4159…
Sept. 20, 2021:
Bunch et al (2021) was published by @SciReports. It was immediately met by harsh criticism from archaeologists, airburst experts, radiocarbon dating experts & other scientists.


Sept. 29, 2021:
Image forensics expert & scientific integrity advocate E. Bik (@microbiomdigest) discovered evidence for photoshopping (cloning) of one of the 18 digital photographs of the excavation. She immediately published her finding in PubPeer.
Read 20 tweets
Oct 30, 2021
Whenever I look at Bunch et al #Sodom #airburst paper I find more problems. I already documented the authors’ profound misunderstanding of airbursts (see link). Now I see that they get much of their information about #Tunguska from creationist literature.
In their subsection entitled “Comparison to Tunguska cosmic airburst” they make several false assertions. In re-reading it today, another claim jumped out at me: “The airburst generated a pressure wave that toppled or snapped >80 million trees, some up to 1-m in diameter..” Image
I wasn’t aware that there were any trees a meter in diameter that had been toppled. I didn’t see any meter-wide trees when I visited explored the Siberian taiga in the blast zone 13 years ago. None of the surviving trees we cored were that big.
Read 13 tweets
Oct 7, 2021
Here's an aerial photograph of the trees there were blown over by the Tunguska blast. It was taken about 30 years after the 1908 event & was used with other data by Giuseppe Longo to create a map of direction of fallen trees. You can see there is some variation in alignment. Image
In a strong blast wave, there is turbulence & chaotic flow. Terrain influences the direction & intensity too. Not everything that blows down is parallel. It looks to my eye as if, even in this small area, the tree alignment varies by up to 10°. Image
Researchers can survey a blast zone like Tunguska to create a map of debris directing to infer wind vectors by statistically averaging local variation. Longo did that for his Tunguska map. But not everything lines up perfectly because the real world is noisy. Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(