Increasingly common for people to say "my truth" when they mean "my experience."
You can have your own experience, belief, understanding, feelings, perspective, point of view, conviction, etc.
You don't have get to have your own "truth." Truth doesn't reside in an individual.
2/ One might say it's just an expression but it's insidious. Emotional maturity involves the capacity to call into question one's own perceptions & interpretation of events. Experience can be reflected on, understanding can change & evolve, and misperceptions can be corrected.
3/ Describing personal experience as "truth" insidiously erodes our capacity to reflect on and revise our understandings. "My truth" signals (to self and others both) that the experience is not open to question. It insists on being treated as objective fact & so negates a
4/ fundamental psychological truth: that our thoughts & feelings are not synonymous with external reality. All bona fide forms of psychotherapy understand & address this. If our perceptions & self-perceptions are treated as immutable facts, psychotherapy would be impossible.
5/ Emotional growth would be impossible. In contemporary psychological theory, the recognition that our thoughts and feeling are not synonymous with external reality is called "mentalization." Where people speak of "my truth," mentalization is easily derailed.
TBC
6/ When mentalization fails, we may slip into what's called "psychic equivalence" mode...
... "a mind-state where no distinction is drawn between the contents of the mind and the external world—where what is thought in the mind is assumed to be automatically true." (wikipedia)
7/ For example, a person who feels hurt by something another person says or does automatically presumes that the person deliberately & maliciously *intended* to harm them. In their mind, this is an absolute & unquestioned fact. Any capacity to consider other possible explanations
8/ or interpretation of their experience is lost. The capacity to accurately perceive and function in the world is damaged—because there is no longer recognition of a distinction between thoughts and feelings and external reality. And from certainty the other person intended to
9/ harm, it is a small—very small—step to "the person is evil, a monster, they must be destroyed."
Emotional maturity holds in mind that thoughts and feelings are thoughts and feelings and not an infallible gauge of what is real or true. "Psychic equivalence" is like the
10/ egocentrism of a young child who has closed his eyes and therefore believes no one else can see him. In a child, it's cute. In an adult making decisions with real-word consequences, it's disastrous.
Perhaps speaking of "my reality" is just just an expression. But we can
11/ ask whether it's an expression that invites emotionally mature or immature ways of thinking and experiencing.
There is more at stake than meets the eye.
12/ If you liked this thread and want more insights on psychology, psychotherapy, and mental health:
✅ RT the FIRST tweet of the thread to share the ♥️
✅ Follow me @JonathanShedler
Thanks for reading 🤝
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ In historic usage, it referred to taking a position (as a matter of *technique,* aimed at self-knowledge) equidistant from id, ego, & superego—terms that no longer hold currency in contemporary psychoanalytic theory, and that are now meaningless to most
So here’s an update:
3/ The term is a recognition that we humans are of many minds about many things, there is inner contradiction, and the contradictions can be at any level of conscious awareness
“Neutrality” means helping the person become aware of all of the inner facets and contraductions,
1/ Depressive Personality Style
“Despite its omission from the DSM, depressive personality is the most common personality syndrome seen in clinical practice. It is a personality syndrome in every sense of the term: an enduring pattern of psychological functioning evident by
2/ adolescence and encompassing the full spectrum of personality processes.
People with depressive personalities are chronically vulnerable to painful affect, especially feelings of inadequacy, sadness, guilt, and shame. They have difficulty recognizing their needs, and when
3/ they do recognize them, they have difficulty expressing them. They are often conflicted about allowing themselves pleasure. They may seem driven by an unconscious wish to punish themselves, either by getting into situations destined to cause pain or depriving themselves of
1/6 The goal of psychotherapy is to insert spaces for noticing and reflecting where space has not previously existed—and thereby create opportunities to know ourselves more fully, connect with others more deeply, and live our lives more congruently
2/6 Psychotherapy is about slowing things down—so we can begin to see and understand patterns and responses that otherwise happen quickly, automatically, without awareness or understanding
3/6 Talk about “optimizing” psychotherapy or making it more “efficient” betrays a fundamental misunderstanding
We find ourselves in difficulties specifically because we *cannot* slow down to notice and reflect. The rush to optimize every facet of life is the disease—not the cure
1/ This post is misleading. The research does NOT show people who get these CBT treatments get well—what people take “effective” to mean. Overwhelming majority do NOT. They do better than a control group, which is a totally different issue
Not to do better than a control group which gets no treatment that’s meant to help (or no treatment at all)
This is why people have become so skeptical of “experts.” What they get isn’t what they’re led to expect
3/ It’s really important to understand WHAT GOES WRONG when findings from therapy outcome research get reported to the public
The research yields quantitative findings. Tons and tons of them. No one without a serious (professional level) understanding of statistic AND knowledge
1/ The essence of real psychotherapy is exploring and understanding why things go wrong, so we don't have to keep repeating the same painful, self-defeating patterns
👉 But... many poorly-trained therapists cannot differentiate between exploring and understanding vs. BLAMING
2/ When they confuse exploration with blaming, they’re trapped. Psychological inquiry can lead only to (1) blaming the patient or (2) blaming the patient’s problems on someone or something else
👉They can’t blame the patient, because they’re
3/ supposed to “support” the patient
So someone or something else *must* be blamed: toxic people, parents, partner, narcissists, abusers, predators, society, the “system”
When therapists are trapped in this way of thinking, the patient is also trapped