TL:DR; TokeMak solves for misaligned incentives within LM through providing sustainable liquidity to DeFi by means of an aggregation of LP rewards and the deployment of those rewards by the protocols LDs
As always; this is NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE. This only reflects my own synthesis and understanding of previous work by @Archer_MD_ , @LiquidityWizard , and the team at @TokenReactor.
If I misrepresent anything please feel free to correct me
🅰️ Problem Statement
The demand for liquidity is easily observed throughout the crypto ecosystem. People want to swap between different tokens on varying L1s and L2s and experience/use a variety of protocols
Protocols want liquidity to bring value and usage to their product
🅱️Why current solutions don't work
Currently LM is the main means by which protocols bootstrap liquidity, but that comes with some major issues
I. This inflationary dependency hopes that the underlying asset appreciates enough to offset the inflation
🅱️cont
II. Hyperissuance typically leads to opportunistic dumping thus adding sell pressure to the token
III. When LM incentives dry up, that mercenary TVL leaves in search for better yield removing the source of liquidity you attempted to bootstrap in the first place
1⃣ Enter the reactor
How does TOKE solve this?
TOKE offers a "buy/borrow to bootstrap" model to budding protocols in need of liquidity so they don't have to deal with these token inflation issues
This is the future vision of TOKE, but not necessarily what's happening now
2⃣ The road less traveled
How does TOKE get to the point where it can power the entire DeFi ecosystem with sustainable liquidity?
To understand how we get there you have to understand two key concepts
I. Protocol Controlled Assets
II. The Singularity
2⃣ I. PCA
What is PCA?
PCA are all the assets TOKE, the protocol, owns. E.g. 10K ETH, 5K OHM, 5K SUSHI etc.
How does TOKE get PCA?
TOKE provides single sided liquidity pools, "reactors", for LPs to deposit into to mitigate impermanent loss and earn TOKE
2⃣ I. cont
TOKE stakers, "liquidity directors", then direct TOKE deploy the deposited liquidity to trading markets to earn fees. Those fees are taken by TOKE as PCA
Thus TOKE internalizes LP rewards in trading markets, and externalizes TOKE to LPs who provide liquidity
2⃣ II. The Singularity
Eventually there comes an inflection point where the pool of PCA grows so large that external assets and LP rewards are no longer needed, and TOKE can shut off emissions
It is at this point where TOKE can power the entire DeFi ecosystem with its PCA
3⃣ Whats in it for me?
Broadly there are two core stakeholders to consider, and what's incentivizing them to even interact with TOKE
I. LPs
II. TOKE Stakers (LDs)
3⃣ I. LPs
Why would I want to be an LP?
Depositing into reactor provides a multitude of benefits for LPs. For one, you're still earning yield on your deposits.
It's also convenient and secure, you don't have to worry about which pools to deploy your assets to as TOKE does that
3⃣ I. cont
You're also mitigating impermanent loss as TOKE subsidizes that for you by pulling from PCA and slashing TOKE rewards from stakers
Finally, you're also provided with an abstraction layer from the growing complexity of liquidity provisioning; see UNISWAP V3
3⃣ II. LDs
Why would I want to be an LD?
I get exposure to the underlying price of TOKE, valued as a price per unit of liquidity, and I get to direct the liquidity and earn rewards from the massive pool of TOKEs PCA
I can also direct PCA to support liquidity for my project
3⃣ II. cont
Who could be an LD?
DEXs, DAOs, protocols, VC/Funds, and etc. Anyone who needs accessible liquidity without the hurdles of traditional liquidity bootstrapping incentives wants to be an LD and participate in the TOKE system
4⃣ Bonus round
There are a few common questions one might ask that I'll try to answer briefly here
I. What if someone forked TOKE?
Well you'd earn no advantage from that. The crux of the issue is PCA, which you can't fork, so what exactly would be the point of forking
4⃣ cont.
II. How long would it take to reach the singularity?
Fair question, wouldn't it take forever to reach the singularity?
No not necessarily, its possible for TOKE to partner with other protocols with large amounts of PCA (Olympus, Maker, Rari) to speed up the process
4⃣ cont.
III. Will TOKE be limited to the ETH ecoystem?
No! TOKE need not be limited to a singular L1 and in fact its quite easy to imagine TOKEs value proposition being spread across multiple L1s, L2s, and etc.
A multichain TOKE could definitely be possible
4⃣ cont.
IV. What about TOKEs FDV and emissions?
Well that's the point of the singularity. At some point PCA grows large enough where TOKE no longer needs to provide LP rewards. It's very possible that a significant portion of the 100M TOKE is never emitted
5⃣ Conclusion
Not only does TOKE's have product-market fit, it essentially creates a new business model LAAS or liquidity as a service. It also has really cool mech vibes which everyone can enjoy
I'd encourage everyone to visit their website tokemak.xyz and learn!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
TL:DR; RomeDAO is expanding the Olympus ecosystem onto the Kusama and Polkadot chains with a fresh perspective on how to carry out the Ohmie mission
NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE
🅰️Why Kusama/Polkadot?
Moonriver is EVM-compatible with significant liquidity that Romans can leverage to be seen as the premier stable asset within the ecosystem
Their unique value props are out of scope for this thread, but lead to them being primed for exponential growth
1⃣ Mechanism design
Following OHM in its goal to create a healthy POL based reserve currency RomeDAO is offering 3 different bonds with FRAX, MIM, and MOVR as an initial means of bootstrapping
There's a potential partnership with @AnyswapNetwork to bridge assets to MOVR
TL:DR; 01 is bringing a unique financial primitives to the Solana ecosystem: Everlasting Options. 01 is tackling unmet demand in DeFi in the form of more sophisticated options, and if they can execute/adapt they could be an ecosystem mainstay
🅰️What are Everlasting Options?
Everlasting Options are essentially just perpetual futures, but for options
They work in pretty much the same way, people who have bought the option have to pay some funding rate to people who sold the option to keep their continuous position
🅱️Why Everlasting Options?
Standard options have expiry dates meaning to get perpetual exposure, you have to constantly roll your position over carrying significant cost, risk, and time investment
Everlasting options allow perpetual exposure without contract renewal process
TL:DR; TempleDAO is reorganizing its governance/discord structure to effectively leverage the high quality community members and their talents in product development
1⃣ Why now?
Chasing the exclusivity of Temple, community members have rushed to join the discord in efforts of contributing to get access to the Fire Ritual
This has led to curating high quality community members with a diverse range of Talents that the DAO can leverage
2⃣ What's happening?
TempleDAO is creating 5 Enclaves that mimic the structure of the current team within which community members can contribute to with their respective talents
This allows for community members to engage with the DAO and receive rewards based on contribution
TL:DR; TOKE ensures that LPs can withdraw the same quantity of assets they've deposited without IL by rebalancing assets in such a way that net loss can only occur on a system level in any market condition
IL mitigation mechanics have been a hot topic for the mechs @TokenReactor, and to answer those questions Carson and co have released an initial version of a gitbook
TL:DR; Strips is a derivatives DEX that's bringing a classic TradFi derivative to crypto: Interest Rate Swaps (IRS), and if executed properly Strip could see growth on the level of dYdX or other derivatives EXs
Not Financial Advice
1⃣ Product
IRS are forward contracts where you swap future interest payments based on some notional amount
There are 3 main types
1. Fixed to Floating: fixed to variable
2. Floating to Fixed: variable to fixed
3. Floating to Floating: variable to variable
1⃣ con
Offering IRS is a natural evolution in DeFi that mimics a trend in TradFi
Currently there's no protocol that offers IRS and so Strip is stepping in to meet that demand
Strip hasn't released its IRS DEX yet, but plans to offer the first two types of IRS
There's been some great discussion going on in the @templedao discord regarding the unstake queue and whether it's really an appropriate mechanism for controlling liqudity
Just wanted to give my 2 cents on it
I can see why forcefully having shallow liquidity on markets and an unstake queue to prevent capital flight is shady
I think a lot of crypto-natives from 2008 till now have experienced rug pulls and the crushing feeling of getting dumped on by a protocol
However, I think it's different in the case for Temple and here's why
Temple has given a promise of a safe-haven from the volatility of crypto. Volatility doesn't just mean stopping the price from going up, but also down
If the DAO wants to control that what can they do?