If you are concerned about threats to democracy, such as changes in election laws, you should also worry about how politicization of the career public sector will remove a protection against creeping authoritarianism.
Despite Trump's framing of the "deep state" the US actually relies more on political appointees than other countries, and the career public service has been shrinking over time. 2/ donmoynihan.substack.com/p/you-should-b…
This post digs in to explain something that did not get a lot of attention before the election, which was a Trump Executive Order that would have allowed him to convert career officials to at will employees. Why was this so dangerous? 3/
There are three reasons why we should worry about politicization. First, despite the claims of proponents of the unitary exec & politicization (incl. members of SCOTUS) the evidence we have is that politicization reduces performance, transparency and stability in government. 4/
Second, politicization embeds polarization more deeply into our governing processes, pushing our moderates and replacing them with ideological extremists. This, in turn, will undermine continuity in policy implementation.
Third, and most importantly, career officials are more likely than political appointees to flag illegal behavior and norm violation, and bring attention to it. They did so during Trump’s illegal effort to trade US resources to Ukraine for dirt on his political opponent. 6/
The push for politicization comes not from people who actually study public management, but conservative unitary executive fans from places like the Heritage Foundation & Federalist Society. They have not accounted for how such powers will be abused by authoritarian leaders. 7/
Interesting to note the hypocrisy of Trump appointees like Kellyanne Conway and Russ Vought who refused to resign from government advisory gigs.
Vought tried to convert 88% of his OMB career employees to at will - a much more damaging form of politicization. 8/
The connections are pretty clear. Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society helped bankroll the work of Ginni Thomas. He also arranged for Clarence Thomas to attend Koch fundraisers. propublica.org/article/claren…
The shared purpose of Leonard Leo, Ginni Thomas, Clarence Thomas and the Koch network was to put right-wing judges on the court. And Clarence Thomas used his public position on the court to raise money for that.
Clarence Thomas used to support the Chevron doctrine, which allows delegation to administrative expertise. But the people who fund the Koch network can't buy off administrators, so they want to remove their influence from the process. Now Thomas agrees with the donors.
Also this guy: young people today can't afford a house because they occasionally buy new clothes
If the people @FinancialReview care for free speech at all, they will do the decent thing and allow replies to this tweet, allowing a full and frank exchange of views.
America has 22 times the firearm homicide rates as the European Union.
We are less safe and less free because of how available guns are in this country. healthdata.org/news-events/in…
America makes up about 15% of gun homicides, and together with five other countries constitutes half of gun homicides in the world. vox.com/2018/8/29/1779…
The reason more people in America are dying from guns is because there are more guns in America.
America is the only country with more guns than people. cnn.com/2021/11/26/wor…
New, from me: I wrote about how the emerging debacle at New College (one-third of faculty gone, students can't find classes, housed in airport hotels) reflects the incompetence of populists like DeSantis.
Competence, the ability to perform organizational core tasks, is an underrated quality. It is an especially overlooked quality by people who value other things, like ideological goals, or believe that existing institutions are corrupt, or who have never actually run things.
Fuck Around (left, celebrating the firing of a faculty who criticized the Regents)
and
Find Out: (right, soliciting faculty applications because you don't have enough to teach classes - one-third have left for some reason).
The DeSantis takeover of New College was meant to offer a model of a conservative-run higher ed.
The result is chaos, which is what happens when incompetent people who don't actually care about organizational mission take over public services. insidehighered.com/news/students/…
The NY Times recently featured Chris Rufo to explain how DEI was undermining liberal education.
You know what actually undermines a liberal education?
Losing one-third of faculty.
Not offering core classes to students.
Raging incompetence and blind indifference.
Rufo is seeking to personally recruit replacements. Which is completely at odds with what university trustees are supposed to do. No way that could go wrong, right?
From the internal Texas A&M reports: it was A&M Regents who signaled their opposition to McElroy, at which point the university figured out they would not tenure her.
Seems like the Regents cost A&M $1M. Nice job.
: ... tamus.edu/wp-content/up
Not great when a university President is saying "I'm assuming all texts were deleted" and then tells faculty she was not involved in hiring process. (She has since resigned).