📌 Pep Guardiola's Manchester City 2021/22 [Thread]:
Community Shield vs Leicester:
- First evidence of the 2-3 build-up system (shifting from the 3-2 last season)
- Focus on progressing through fullbacks and #8s
- Seven lateral zones
- Reaching wide players in movement, 1v1
The establishment of seven lateral zones:
Spurs vs City:
- City struggle vs Spurs' narrow and compact defensive block
- Inverted fullbacks often narrower than #8s
- Reliance on play through #8s to progress to final third
- Lack of dynamism and predictable to defend against
City vs Norwich:
- More elaborate rotations allows Cancelo to consistently access final third, combine with Grealish
- Walker offers progression from right half space
- Bernardo's movement allows City to bypass the midfield
- Jesus as right winger a dynamic threat in behind
Simplified, City create a repeatable chain of progression:
In defence, City are tight - they rarely concede possession and rarely concede chances - thanks to their counter-pressing and rest defence:
- Overload area where ball is, with players in close proximity to create territorial dominance
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Analysing the Role of Inverted Fullbacks in the EPL this Weekend: [Thread]
Manchester United:
- Shaw - ineffective when inverted: 4/10
- Wan Bissaka - offered verticality from underlaps and created chances (plus the goal): 8/10
Spurs:
- Udogie - inversion left Son isolated at times: 5/10
- Emerson Royal - scored, and gave rise to Skipp and Kulusevski's balance on the right wing: 6/10
Erik Ten Hag is revolutionising the way Manchester United play football. This isn’t without difficulty however – Ten Hag’s approach is risky and requires substantial change. This thread explores the topic of personnel and risk vs reward when considering ETH's principles. [Thread]
There are three key facets to consider in this discussion:
- The risky nature of Ten Hag’s principles
- The quality and implementation of coaching
- The players: in terms of individual profiles and team make-up
Further, some parameters to consider when evaluating the relative success/failure of Ten Hag’s approach:
- Time it takes to implement principles
- Limiting factors (player quality & profiles, execution of principles, luck)
- What is to be considered a success
📌 How Erik ten Hag's Manchester United struggled against West Ham's mid-block - and what this means for the players and Ten Hag's principles of play [thread].
Manchester United and West Ham lined up as such:
West Ham sat in a 442 mid-block and looked to attack United in transitions - building attacks through hold up play and direct dribbling, before subsequent set-pieces.
United were matched player for player in build-up and progression, and struggled for inspiration.
📌 Using Data to Identify Areas Where Erik ten Hag Can Improve Manchester United [thread]:
Before looking at areas at United that Erik ten Hag can improve at United, it could be worth reviewing the principles of play Ten Hag has implemented as a coach at Ajax recently:
This is 100% true. Players who doubt, don’t have confidence or clarity. They’re susceptible to possession loss, they slow down play, they’re less likely to execute actions well.
For me, there are three main aspects to achieving clarity:
1) understanding of system and principles
2) understanding of what you’re going to do
3) coaching/instructions from teammates
Ultimately, a system or coaching in that vein (#1) alleviates the prerogative of a player to make a decision in each given circumstance (#2).
To achieve absolute clarity and confidence in your actions, in any given state of the game (with time on the ball or under pressure, when you have multiple options or when you have no options), you need that overarching set of principles.
📌 The Titanic Battle Between Pep Guardiola and Diego Simeone [mini-thread]:
Atleti began in a 532 block, with City implementing their usual build-up strategies. Advantage City; over 90 minutes they would most likely have broken this block down; the progression angles are favourable and they had ultimate control in build-up.
City were able to build in their regular manner. They had an advantage over the front two, and could access most of the players in the progression chain easily, accessing their wingers.