Oh no I found an Edwardian era article about animal masquerade balls
... and right after that, an article about playing the piano with rifles.
Me to literally everyone in the Edwardian era:
It wouldn't be an Edwardian magazine if it didn't include at least one story with racism and colonialism.
Okay, stepping away from the illustrated Edwardian magazines for a while. I could easily lose days reading through them.
I must say that Edwardian photo magazines are a treasure trove. Those folks were into some weird shit, as in this example I have shown before:
Old time machine goals: go back and stop Hitler
New time machine goals: go back to Edwardian England and ask: “What the FUCK is wrong with you?”
Honestly if I slap enough people in Edwardian England that might indirectly solve the Hitler problem too
Regarding that Masquerade article: I went back to read it, and I could not have written a more perfect introduction to it if I tried.
When a town in New Jersey put out an order that all unmuzzled dogs should be shot on sight, one fellow had a unique bulletproof solution.
Presented without comment.
Oh, cool -- I found another painting showing galloping horses before the invention of high-speed photography.
Definitely bookmarking this article to read later.
Solar power, circa 1904.
Next up: found an article about ghosts in art.
THIS ONE.
I should send this 1904 article along to some of my astronomy friends.
Somehow, Edwardian people managed to make snowpeople creepy as fucking hell, too.
This group is definitely coming alive at night to murder people.
If you're wondering: could Edwardians make parades terrifying? The answer is yes.
I should note that when I say "Edwardian," I am largely referring to the time period, and not necessarily specifically UK folks at that time. Some of this weird shit comes from other European countries.
Let's add this to the list of insane shit that Edwardian era people did for kicks.
I mean...
"Pardon to me, Miss, but what happened to your intenstines?"
Oh wow -- I just reposted some mathematical fallacies on twitter the other day, and here's one from 1904! This is a new fallacy for me. See if you can figure out what went wrong!
Okay, maybe more later.
Okay shit just this one more for now.
"Tender romance." Okay, based on the facial expressions, who wants to give this illustration a modern title?
"It's not sexism, it's SCIENCE!!!"
This is fascinating. Someone noting the similarity in structure between clouds and cauliflower in 1904, way before the mathematics of fractals.
And I was so enraptured with the cauliflower head, I didn't even notice the story of people being rescued at sea at first.
Holy SHIT. This "tramp chair" was proposed and seriously considered for use in punishing vagrants. The victim would be basically seated immobile, to be paraded before the public.
Okay, more later. At this rate, I will finish my book draft in... 2032.
Waiting for food to be ready, so here's some more. For those who say that Edwardians clearly were bored out of their minds, well. people were working on it. There's a whole article on hypothetical new amusement park rides.
And they just get weirder...
... and weirder...
... and weirder...
... I mean...
... I don't even understand the purpose here.
It is important to know how your leader measures up in comparison with others in the world.
... and your scientists, apparently?
The Strand was really into publishing optical illusions from readers, which I am grateful for.
And here's a cool cat illusion!
All of this is from a *single* volume of The Strand, btw.
For those who asked: Just use Google books to track down The Strand, as all the issues are free to access there.
A few more random tidbits before going to bed: the whole reason I was reading The Strand was to track down Sherlock Holmes stories, which were illustrated.
Now this image is just unabashed Edwardian mansplaining.
This is genuinely fascinating -- an article where the author endeavors to track down the models who sat for famous artworks.
A LOT going on here.
"I do say, I wish a motherfucker would."
The inside of a salt mine. I don't think it ever occurred to me that it could be a quite striking thing to see.
There's also an article all about how different sound effects were produced for stage performances.
Weird Edwardian inventions.
Unsettling.
Apparently the "black and blue versus white and gold dress" controversy of 1904.
The internet couldn't come fast enough.
Okay, going to wrap up this thread here and go to bed! Thanks to everyone for reading and sharing!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So here's my hypothesis on the whole Musk twitter deal. 1/
Dude LOVES Twitter. As a narcissist, he can't get enough of the adulation of the right-wing mouth-breathers. But Twitter keeps banning the people he loves, so he becomes convinced that Twitter is a liberal SJW organization. 2/
He decides to teach them a lesson, and make an offer to buy the company. Absolutely convinced that it is a left-wing political site, he's sure they'll refuse his offer, even a ridiculously good offer. Then he can say "aha! they're so woke!" and his fans will cheer. 3/
Hey let's make Twitter like the old days! Speculate with an example of a #FakeTrumpAnnouncement!
"My Fellow Americans, I have recently received intelligence that has made me conclude that pee is not in fact stored in the balls." #FakeTrumpAnnouncement
"Fellow Patriots, I am here tonight to tell you that untreated syphilis is no joke. It can have catastrophic effects on your brain funshionalialialialialialialifunkytownshitfuckality." #FakeTrumpAnnouncement
Rahasia is one of two adventures that the Hickmans originally self-published, along with the other classic Pharaoh. It was originally published by their Daystar West Media in 1980, in a run of no more than 200 copies.
The Hickmans originally wrote and sold D&D adventures to fund their own interest in the hobby. However, they ran into financial difficulties and sold their first two adventures to TSR, who also hired Tracy Hickman as a writer.
Since I've already seen an incredible amount of this abuser logic coming from the pro-forced birth crowd, I wanted to take a moment to address it. I too started out as a person with a "moderate" view of abortion -- which it turns out is exactly what Roe allowed. 1/
But it quickly became clear that the pro-forced birth movement have no interest in making abortion less common. They have no interest in comprehensive sex education, easy access to contraceptives, or resources for family planning and support. 2/
In fact, they largely oppose these motions. Famously, when Sandra Fluke argued before Congress that women should have better access to birth control, she was labeled a "slut." Pro-forced birthers have no interest in any practical means of reducing abortion. 3/