Everyone keeps talking about covid becoming endemic, but as I listen to the conversation, it’s becoming more & more clear to me that very few of you know what “endemic” means.
So here’s a thread on how pandemics end.
In the beginning of any pandemic, we have 4 options for what could happen:
1) continually occurring disease, with small or large surges 2) local elimination of disease 3) global eradication of disease 4) complete extinction of the pathogen
Option 4 (extinction) is absolutely the hardest, but long-term would mean we could all completely forget about the disease.
We have basically never done this in the entire history of humans—but, if we’re being honest, a big reason we haven’t is fear & mistrust of other humans.
Option 3 (eradication) is also very hard but long-term just about everyone could forget about the disease.
You & I aren’t worried about smallpox, no matter where we travel or what we do — unless you’re a researcher at one of the 2 super high biosecurity labs that have a sample.
Option 2 (elimination) is still pretty hard, and long-term not everyone can forget about the disease.
For lots of the world, this is measles is — we’ve got great vaccines & most of us don’t need to worry about measles, but public health officials still monitor for it everywhere.
Now we get to Option 1 (continually occurring disease). This is easier short-term but it’s the hardest *long-term*.
It’s also super vague: it could mean anything from hundreds or thousands per day to one or two per year.
The other name for this is, you guessed it, “endemic”.
In more technical terms “endemic” means: “Controlled at or below an ‘acceptable’ level”
What level is “acceptable” differs from place to place, over time & between diseases, and it may not always be explicit, but when a disease is endemic, there is a threshold!
If a disease is really bad, ‘acceptable’ is very low—potentially even indistinguishable from elimination.
The plague (yes that one!) is kinda common among rodents in parts of the US, but if even ONE person shows up to a doctor with symptoms, public health jumps into action!
On the other hand, if a disease is not really that bad at all, the acceptable level can be really very high.
Up to 80% of US adults are infected by the virus that causes cold sores (aka oral herpes)!
But public health takes *nearly* no action, except to protect infants.
You might have noticed something important here, and it’s something I think MANY of the people shrugging off covid becoming endemic get wrong:
“Endemic” does NOT mean “harmless”.
Whether a disease is endemic, epidemic, eliminated, or eradicated does NOT tell us how serious it is, and does NOT tell us how many people get sick or die.
We have to CHOOSE that number.
So here’s the kicker: “endemic” doesn’t mean “never think about covid again”. It’s exactly the opposite!
Endemic means someone is ALWAYS thinking about covid.
Endemic means public health is always monitoring disease & always intervening when cases cross the “acceptable” level.
Every time I tweet about this I get people in mentions saying “but we don’t take precautions for the flu!”
Those people are 100% WRONG!
Thousands of people work daily to monitor, prepare for, & respond to fluctuations in flu number and in the flu virus itself! It’s a HUGE task!
Sure, maybe the flu doesnt impact *your* life, except some years you get a flu shot, or maybe you have once or twice really actually gotten the flu & not just a bad cold you *called* the flu.
(Pro-tip: if you dont feel like you’ve been hit by a train, it’s probably not the flu).
But that is because PUBLIC HEALTH KNOWS WHAT IT’S DOING!!!
There are clearly defined “acceptable” levels for different strains of the flu, and we spend so so much time & energy & money working to keep the flu below those levels. So that YOU don’t get sick.
When flu cases cross the threshold & the public health lever switches from “monitor flu activity” to “take action YOU don’t notice.
But not because it isnt happening — because the acceptable level is LOW ENOUGH that those actions happen before it impacts your daily life.
If you work somewhere like a daycare, or a nursing home, or (like me) a School of Public Health that shares a campus with a hospital, you probably DO sometimes notice.
Because those are places where flu is most problematic & so they are also where we focus our interventions.
So what does this tell us about how pandemics end?
Well, it tells us that we CAN put in the work to really get rid of it once & for all, if we have the will and the strength and the interest and the resources.
It probably gets harder & harder the longer we wait, though.
Smallpox was around for a very long time before we took action & it took a long time to defeat.
Similarly, polio eradication is long overdue, but we’re still trying and I’m certain we will get there.
Yes, eradication is HARD but we could still choose to make it our moonshot if we wanted to.
It would definitely take time. It would probably take new science, new ideas, & new tools. And it would take both leaders & everyday people actively committing to doing what it takes.
Realistically, despite New Zealand’s valiant efforts, we are not going to do that.
We don’t have the political or social will to eliminate or eradicate covid.
But that means we HAVE TO continue to CONTROL covid!
That’s the only other option. THAT is what endemic means!
So, yes, our only viable choice left is covid becoming endemic. It didn’t have to be this way, but our leaders MADE a choice.
And now they need to make another choice: They need to choose an “acceptable” level of COVID death & disease.
Because pandemics don’t end by a disease just fading away, & pandemics don’t end with everyone able to completely forget about the disease.
Pandemics end when we decide how much death and disease we’re satisfied with.
I dont know about you, but for me—this👇🏼is too much death.
A good addendum here that, mathematically, “endemic” depends on Re & the relative changes in protected & susceptible populations.
Re isn’t completely up to us, but one goal of a control program is very often to get & keep it below 1.
IMO, there is very little that’s more dangerous than tyrants acknowledging obvious problems everyone can see exists, because “reasonable” people then assume the tyrants will fix these problems.
The tyrants will not. They are always and only going to advance their own interests.
For example: Tyrants do not like universities because universities are an alternative center of free speech and thought and because education has the power to overturn tyrants.
When a tyrant tells you there is a problem with the universities, this is not because they are going to fix the problem. It is a trick. The tyrants are always planning to burn the universities down.
I did a couple raw milk posts this week, and a frequent comment was: “if babies can drink raw milk, why can’t adults?”
It shouldn’t need to be said but:
Human mothers are NOT cows. Human milk is NOT the same as cow milk.
NEVER give a human baby “raw” cow milk.
Also, human babies CAN get sick from human milk but it’s also their best food source—even though it is sometimes not an option for all babies or parents.
So, let’s talk about how human babies can get sick from human milk.
The first way human milk can make human babies sick is that some (but NOT all) infectious diseases can be passed from mom to baby in the milk.
I love twitter bc where else can I, an person with two graduate degrees from Harvard in both infectious disease epidemiology and biostatistics, be assured I am wrong about infectious disease epi and statistics by a software engineer who has “read multiple FDA package inserts”
sorry if that’s elitist, but I worked really really really hard to know more about this stuff than the average person, so 🤷🏼♀️
Having read multiple software installation guides does not make me think I know more about software engineering than a software engineer.
But maybe I’ve been selling myself short all these years!
The “no defiers” assumption seems unlikely to hold — is there really no possible couple who would have divorced if the husband’s workplace stayed the same but not if it had hired more women?
Also, the “treatment” is “parental divorce” which sounds like a single “point” exposure but it’s not. It’s time-varying.
The workplace gender data is daily (wow!) so every day is a new opportunity for the gender-ratio to affect divorce — i.e. timing of divorce likely violates the exclusion restriction assumption.
A good rule of thumb when doing studies with a “never treated” category is to ask yourself “when does never start?”.
If there isn’t a clear start date for “never” then you don’t have a point exposure!!
If everyone you know is suddenly getting “food poisoning”, just FYI that it is probably not actually food poisoning but is instead norovirus.
Norovirus (sometimes called “stomach flu” but not actually flu) is seasonal, and right now in the US it is norovirus season.
Norovirus symptoms are mostly vomiting, diarrhea, and cramps. But some people also have headache and fever.
Typically, symptoms last only a couple days, but for very young kids, very old people, or people who have weakened immune systems for any reason can be sick for longer.
Norovirus spreads by when uninfected people accidentally ingest the poop or vomit of an infected person (eww!).
This happens when teeny tiny bits of poop or vomit get onto other people, shared surfaces, or into shared food.