Today is #WrongfulConvictionDay! Please help raise awareness by RETWEETING this thread! By our best estimates, at least 1-4% of convictions are wrongful, meaning there are between 20,000 & 100,000 innocent people locked up in U.S. prisons.
Since 1989, there have been over 2800 exonerations, totaling over 25,000 years lost. I spent 4 years wrongly imprisoned. The average in the U.S. is 9 years. Many cases don’t get overturned for decades.
The longest sentence served was that of Anthony Mazza, who spent 47 years wrongfully convicted. law.umich.edu/special/exoner…
There are many factors that contribute to wrongful convictions. 1 in 5 wrongful convictions involved incentivized jailhouse informants offering bogus testimony in exchange for dropped charges or lighter sentences in unrelated cases.
Misused or flawed forensic science is more common than you’d think, occurring in 1 out of 4 wrongful convictions nationally. Many people have been convicted on what we now know to be junk science: bite mark evidence, hair comparison, tire tread evidence.
Even fingerprint analysis can be problematic. Cognitive neuroscientist Itiel Dror has shown that when analysts are given biasing info, like whether or not a suspect confessed, it can alter their analysis of whether a print is a match or not. psmag.com/news/bias-and-…
Many wrongful convictions result from inadequate defense counsel. Public defenders are often overworked. In the worst cases, according to the Innocence Project, lawyers have:
1 in 4 wrongful convictions involves a false confession. How on earth could an innocent person confess to a crime they didn’t commit? Expert Saul Kassin explains here:
Eyewitness misidentification is the greatest contributing factor to wrongful convictions. This is due to problems with suggestive police lineups as well as the inherent fallibility of human perception and memory.
Official misconduct plays a role in 55% of wrongful convictions. More than half the time, prosecutors and police break the rules, often by concealing exculpatory evidence.
When men are wrongly convicted, it’s usually because a crime occurred, but they got the wrong person. When women are wrongly convicted, often there never was a crime. They are accused of killing their infants and intimate partners who actually died of accidents or illnesses.
And, of course, like everything in the criminal justice world, these problems disproportionately affect people of color.
Once exonerations occur, it’s a battle to get compensation for those years lost.
But there are people fighting to change that! Thanks @RepMaxineWaters for introducing the Justice for Exonerees Act! If you want to make it easier for exonerees to be compensated, sign the petition here: bit.ly/3FbUdAh
Every state or region has its own innocence organization. Please support the one closest to you! They all need help to free more innocent people. innocencenetwork.org/directory
Today, an Italian judge ruled that there is sufficient evidence for Rudy Guede—the man who murdered my roommate eighteen years ago—to stand trial for a new set of charges against another young woman: sexual assault, domestic battery, and stalking.
/thread
I wish I could say I was surprised, but I’m not. Not by the evidence, which includes witness testimony as well as thousands of photos, text messages, and audio files. Not by the bravery of the young woman who came forward.
Certainly not by Guede’s denial; that’s the one thing he’s been consistent about for the past eighteen years: refusing to take responsibility for his violence.
It's my birthday today. I'm thinking about how I stopped celebrating my birthday in prison. It felt like a pointless ritual that belonged to the outside world. I was facing more years inside than I’d been alive so marking the passage of time wasn’t something to celebrate.
/🧵
I turned 21 in prison, with no rousing cheers for a first legal drink. Not even prison hooch, though my cellmates did attempt to ferment pineapple juice with pizza yeast in a two-liter water bottle hidden behind the toilet.
Just five days prior, I’d passed my first Fourth of July in prison more homesick than ever. I wasn’t even in the mood to go outside for “aria” and walk around in circles under the hot July sun, though it had become the highlight of my days.
This battle over Abrego Garcia is simple. It doesn't matter that he was here illegally. It doesn't matter if he's a gang member or if he's a wife beater (both of which are disputed). It doesn't matter if you think he deserves to be deported or to be in prison. / thread
It doesn't matter if you think the county is overrun with immigrants who entered illegally. It doesn't matter if the system is burdened with processing these immigration hearings. Only one thing matters here, and all the rest is a distraction:
There was standing court order preventing his deportation, and he was arrested and deported anyway. Even if you think that court order was unwise, flawed, or based on politically motivated reasoning, it was a legal court order. It was never challenged. It was merely violated.
"I'm not OK with sentencing innocent people," says JD Vance while defending the decision to send a man to an El Salvador prison without due process, without a trial, without the presumption of innocence. We've arrived at the Ministry of Truth.
Yes, every system has an error rate, and wrongful convictions are inevitable. That is why error correction mechanisms are crucial. This is why we have appeals. This is why when an automaker installs a faulty part, they issue a recall. RECALL Kilmar Abrego Garcia!
Vance is arguing here that enforcing the law inevitably means errors, and that providing due process to people is inherently in conflict with enforcing the law, so we just have to accept these errors. But he also wants to say he's not okay with sentencing innocent people.
I remain wrongly convicted of slander in Italy, and loads of people still think I'm a killer despite my acquittal. I am at peace with this. I will also never stop fighting to clear my name.
This is a paradox. Embracing this paradox is a key that can free you from suffering.
/🧵
You must accept that the world is on fire and simultaneously try to douse the flames. You must accept that your life is perfect, with all its flaws and annoyances and griefs and burdens, and still strive to improve yourself and your circumstances.
Zen Master Suzuki Roshi put it this way: "Everything is perfect…and there’s plenty of room for improvement!" What does this mean? How could everything be "perfect" when there are wars and famines and rapes and murders, and myriad injustices that no one deserves?
Before Italy, I was only vaguely aware of that ancient stereotype that all women secretly hate one another, that we are incapable of true friendship. Some call it “venimism”; others refer to “mean girls”.
/thread
In 1893, Italian criminologist Cesare Lombroso wrote: “Due to women’s latent antipathy for one another, trivial events give rise to fierce hatreds...these occasions lead quickly to insolence and assaults.” The source of our antipathy? Sexual jealousy, of course.
We hate one another because we are ever competing for male attention. I always thought this misogynistic myth was obviously false. I had lots of girlfriends, from school and soccer; so did my sisters, my mom. But, then again, I also thought my innocence was obvious…