Ancient Germanic peoples are sometimes considered democratic – but this is a distortion. Some notes on Germanic kingship:
THREAD/
The monarchy was elective but limited to those of noble blood. The Thing, where the monarch was elected, was a sacred event – preceded by sacrifices etc. Those participating were considered members of a holy race and the sons of Heimdall.
The Suebi opened their things with sacrifice and held them in a holy amphictyony. The thing was a sacred gathering which had the object of investing the king in the name of the godhead, in which they ritually participated.
A god does not descend upon the person of the Germanic king, but a part of the divine being lives in him - in him dwells divine power.
Kings were sometimes thought to reincarnate in one of their descendants. St. Olaf II, king of Norway, was supposed to be the reincarnation of the king from the Ynglingar family, and had a tomb to which offerings were made because of his divinity.
Gudmundr of Sweden even underwent apotheosis: he was considered by his people a god, and sacrifices were made to him. Halfdan the Black and Olaf Geirstad-alf had similar fates:
After Halfdan the Black's death, the honour of entombing his body was sought by many throughout Sweden. They decided to split his body and bury parts of it throughout the land.
Olaf turned into an elf after death, and haunted a barrow. He was sought for healing, protection, and guidance.
This attitude towards royalty explains the legends formed about the survival of many princes, starting with Charlemagne, who was said not to have died, but to have been taken up – like Romulus – and was to be found alive in Untersberg, near Salzburg.
The last king of the Amali, Theodoric the Great, had the same fate: taken up alive while riding his horse, he wandered the world mysteriously, appearing sometimes as a wilder Jäger.
A story is also told of Emperor Frederick II: when he died, a man in Sicily saw an army of knights, and in the middle of them, the emperor, who rode towards Mt Etna - a mountain of the dead where King Arthur also abode.
worth reading Evola's take because Montessori has become the dominant way of thinking about education & learning - this is in part what led to and justifies all the 'open learning', 'flipped classroom' nonsense on one side, and 'we don't need no education' on the other
in the thread i mention Steiner schools, which, although nowadays falling victim to the same Montessorian way of thinking, are quite comfortable with things like rote learning, and see their role as impressing values, culture on the children, e.g.
it would probably be worth comparing something like the neo-classical approach, which is also gaining popularity. a lot of people here are interested in homeschooling - even and especially then, it is worth thinking about what education is.
Most people know Evola from his books, but he also wrote dozens if not hundreds of articles for a range of publications. Here he discusses Montessori education - he was actually at their conference in Fascist Italy, presided over by Mdm. Montessori herself.
As one of the two big 'alternative education' systems, Montessori is often lumped in with Steiner schools. But they are very different. See below on Steiner:
Montessori's background was psychology and medicine - she worked especially with children with learning difficulties. A true 'trailblazer', she left her illegitimate son in the care of a wetnurse to pursue her career.
The Seven Towers of Satan corresponding to Ursa Major
This is from a book (Les Sept Tours du Diable) by Jean-Marc Allemand where he takes up and develops something mentioned by Guenon in his review of W. S. Seabrook's 'Adventures in Arabia' and elsewhere.
Seabrook relates a legend from the Middle East about the Seven Towers of Satan, which control and direct the forces of evil in the world. Guenon describes one tower amongst the Yazidi as perhaps being the "tangible and localized base for a centre of counter-initiation."
*** Do we live in a gynaecocracy? ***
Evola introduction to Bachofen's 'Das Mutterrecht' (1949).
Bachofen describes an opposition in the classic & ancient Mediterranean world between civilizations w/ heroic, solar, virile spirituality and cthonic, lunar, feminine spirituality.
Evola describes such civilizations as 'telluric' (tellus = cthonos = earth). They consider the law of the earth the highest law; the Divine Woman embodies what is eternal and unchanging; all it produces has a birth and decline, a purely individual and fleeting life.
Wherever the supreme principle is understood as a Great Mother, the earthly woman, who appears as the closest incarnation thereof, comes to assume a religious dignity and the highest authority. She is the *giver of life*; man is only her instrument.
Everyone has heard of siestas - usually thought to be taken only due to the heat of the day - and nanna-naps, which are seen as a quirk of old age. Soldiers are also famous for kipping whenever they can. These are seen as deviations -- but...
In pre-industrial societies it was normal to have two sleeps - so normal, that people would casually refer to a 'first sleep' and a 'second sleep':