For @damemagazine, I interviewed people in journalism/media criticism about how the press covers different current events, from Afghanistan, to covid, to climate change, & the insurrection. Here are a few quotes that are salient this week. . . . damemagazine.com/2021/09/27/wha…
Greg Sargent, on attacks on American democracy: "This gets to the essence of one of the big problems here. That flagrantly anti-democratic combat is sometimes treated as sort of partisan warfare as usual. And it really isn’t that. . . ." damemagazine.com/2021/09/27/wha…
Sargent, continued: ". . . I think a lot of Americans are really being treated to a kind of mode of coverage that obscures this very profound imbalance between the two parties on really the fundamentals of democracy." damemagazine.com/2021/09/27/wha…
.@drvolts on climate: "We know the number of people who are going to suffer is unfathomable. We know, objectively, the consequences are going to be horrific. . .And I ask you, why, given those circumstances, which are so clear, why isn’t the media upset?" damemagazine.com/2021/09/27/wha…
.@beyerstein on Covid: "There are people who are doing the right thing and people who are doing the wrong thing. Officials who have abandoned their people & officials who are serving their people. I don’t get that narrative consistently from the coverage" damemagazine.com/2021/09/27/wha…
I don't want to overly editorialize, but one general impression I came away w/ was this: there is a strong desire for reporting on current events to contain "a sense of urgency, a willingness to assign responsibility to political leaders, and a strong focus on human welfare. . ."
Comparing Afghanistan coverage to coverage of other events is a very sensitive task. I think such an exploration can lead to insight about journalism, but I also want to be clear: no one I spoke to minimized the dire humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan. damemagazine.com/2021/09/27/wha…
Indeed, many pointed to the passionate humanitarian focus as a real strength of the coverage of Afghanistan. Which is why, again, I came away with the impression that perhaps there is a desire for coverage of other events to convey human agents & human victims w/ greater urgency
I came back to all of this today because of reporting on the debt ceiling. Republicans are *objectively* putting our entire economy at risk. They are also *objectively* hypocritical. Further, their motivations for this potentially catastrophic behavior have been left unclear.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We need to address rising American antisemitism in leftwing & other spaces b/c it's the right thing to do. Secondarily: I will continue to stress that it's the right thing to do for *antifascism*. If we don't heal wounds on our own team, the right-wing will rip them wide open.
We can already see this happening. We are weaker in our coalition than ever before. Many different folks feel betrayed by many other folks. Meanwhile, the college protests were Trump's "Reichstag Fire" to go after DEI as well as entire fields of study & institutions in academia.
Failing to confront antisemitism is wrong. It's against my principles. It's even more vile given Jews who have been loyal *to our coalition* are expressing pain & fear & have been met w/ coldness, denialism, & gaslighting. This is immoral, in my view. It also leaves deep wounds.
I do not like sweeping people's concerns, fears, or pain under the rug. I do not like gaslighting people. If a significant number of people from a minority or otherwise vulnerable population express concerns, fears, or pain, I believe it is wrong to pretend they are not speaking
Perhaps, after hearing people from a group express their concerns, fears, or pain, you will enter all of this differently into your political calculus than I do. That is a more honorable step than not listening at all. If you are intellectually honest about it.
And not listening at all is still less gross than pretending people are not speaking. I do not like this mass act of gaslighting. It disgusts me on a very deep level. I am speaking, here, of American Jews who are expressing concerns, fears, or pain.
The comparisons between any modern protest movement we've seen & the Civil Rights Movement are simply inaccurate. The inaccuracy is beyond frustrating b/c it contributes to an erasure of history. An erasure of the nature of the movement itself. Here are notes from CORE, 1963
The purpose of the movement was to show the world the apartheid state. Nonviolence was a "philosophy" re: right/wrong, but it was also, perhaps more importantly, a tactic w/in a broader strategy. "You will be peaceful. And you will be beaten. And then the world will see."
Members would gather together & study the violence others had experienced. They would then carry out that violence against each other. In order to train themselves, they would hit each other, spit on each other, call each other the n-word. They practiced singing through it.
Here's what I think.
-We have never paid as much attention to any war as we have the Israel/Gaza war. Even our "own" wars.
-Israel has consistently been framed as the primary agent in this defensive war, with malicious (genocidal) intent against Palestinians
-Why?
-Just the fact that we pay more attention to this war should be illuminating.
Why.
Does it require more attention than the Syrian Civil War, Sudan, Ukraine, etc?
Why.
I'm going to tell you what the end of my thought process is, re: the "why"
It's because of Jews. Or, rather, not because of Jews but because of fucking gentile bullshit re: Jews.
I did know that, in fact. And now I know something else: You are wildly unqualified to make any comments on this topic. The depth of the ignorance that you proudly display as "knowledge" is so freaking profound that I don't think you even know what antisemitism is.
If you don't know that
-"Jewish" refers to an ethnicity, as well as a religion
-Western antisemitism has, for over a century (at least, maybe longer) been primarily an anti-ethnic phenomenon
&
-Being Christian hasn't saved ethnic Jews before
Please get out of the conversation.
I would laugh if this weren't so serious. These are profound errors. Is this where they're going now? "He was Christian so it wasn't antisemitic?" I cannot stress how profoundly ignorant that point is about what "Jewish" means & what "antisemitism" means.
Yes. I would count myself as having been sane about Israel pre-10/7, vis à vis other people, as well as careful about my conscious bias. After 10/7, I realized I--& other Westerners--were subject to greater bias than we knew & this bias can be linked to decades of propaganda.
This doesn't mean I approve of Netanyahu's conduct in war or his war-planning. It just means I did not view Israel w/ clarity of thought, nor did I understand its history vis à vis Palestine at all. And I would consider myself well-educated in history.
I'll firmly argue that this type of bias is not only unjust towards Israelis, but unjust towards Palestinians. Many have been indoctrinated by the very same propaganda that has intentionally held Palestinian people as a permanent refugee population to be exploited symbolically.