Corporate media outlets have pulled a muscle patting themselves on the back over the fancy titled "Pandora Papers". Will the world's mighty tremble w/ bombshell "revelations"? No, not really. Whatever it is they're selling, we're not buying. Here's a thread on it 💸🧵
In Latin America we've discovered things that weren't hard to guess. Billionaire Chilean president Piñera has used tax havens. As have Chicago boy Paulo Guedes (Brasil) and Colombian ex-presidents. Also some Russians so Putin can be used on the cover
Unlike Wikileaks revelations where wrongdoing by the world's most powerful actors was laid bare for all to see, the Pandora Papers (like other "papers") reach us after going through the digestive tract of the corporate media. So don't expect the status quo to be challenged at all
Outlets like the NYT, WaPo or the Guardian have cheerled every imperialist war in recent history, while the "chosen" Venezuelan media run on USAID+NED money (it's a guess). These outlets are gatekeepers of the global capitalist system and their mission is to shield it from danger
If transparency and accountability was the goal we'd be able to search this database freely, not rely on corporate journalists that half of the time work as stenographers for western governments and the other half for western intelligence agencies
In what concerns Venezuela, we know that if there was anyone who could be remotely tied to Maduro, his mustache will be all over corporate media. Instead, we hear about a corruption scheme we've known about for years involving former oil minister Rafael Ramírez (cont)
(cont) Not just that, but some of the people involved in the Andorra money-laundering scheme are in jail as part of a state-led investigation, others have outstanding extradition warrants. So the best they can get on Maduro (so far) is a case the Maduro govt itself is prosecuting
This of course is not proof of innocence, it does not demonstrate that high-ranking officials are not involved in corruption schemes. But given how little "evidence" is needed to produce "charges" against empire enemies, it speaks volumes
It's no coincidence that this "investigation" is just looking for someone who can be tied to Putin or other "evil" actors. A few sacrificial lambs are thrown in to make it look credible and rigorous, like this legendary buffoon that is the king of Jordan (a western favorite btw)
The goal of this stunt is to "change everything so everything stays the same." That's why you have these hilariously hypocritical displays like senile-in-chief Joe Biden saying the US is going to crack down on wrongdoing. Like a mob boss worried about illegal gambling
First of all, tax havens are legal. Capitalism encourages corporations/people to not pay taxes. Operations like the Pandora Papers are smokescreens to divert attention towards a few "rotten apples" so no one realizes this is a *system* built on exploitation and inequality
Corruption is of course a huge issue,but the discourse that overplays it as an ethical issue and overlooks all else is also a problem. It means placing all the focus on the "illegal" stealing of public wealth so we'll ignore all the ways in which public wealth is "legally" stolen
We'll be forgiven for not buying that an investigation funded by (among others) the Ford Foundation and Open Society is about "speaking truth to power." It's a magic trick. Soon enough corporate lobbyists will deliver legislation on tax haven reforms and the media will applaud
It's independent outlets like Venezuelanalysis and lots of others that actually challenge the corporate plutocracy status quo. A monster might pretend to slap its own wrist, but it won't kill itself. To donate visit: venezuelanalysis.com/donate
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵When it comes to reporting about Venezuela, there is no corporate outlet even remotely close to the level of dishonesty of the New York Times. Seriously, it's one piece of misrepresented bullsh*t after another. Follow this thread as we break it down
This is the piece:
The article is not to be taken seriously b/c it starts from a blatant lie. US "prodding" has nothing to do with Venezuela holding elections. It is dictated by the Constitution that they be held this year and they were never in doubt shorturl.at/LFusR
Anyone not high on Western exceptionalism would actually be ashamed of their government meddling in other countries' affairs. But alas, this is the NYT.
In corporate media spiel, "restoring democracy" just means a US puppet being back in the presidential palace
🧵🧵The border dispute between Venezuela and Guyana has flared up recently, leading to a war of words, increased military deployment and increasing signs of US intervention. We have prepared an infographic to explain the history and context of the controversy (thread)
The Essequibo Strip is a sparsely populated, 160,000 square km region spanning to the west of the Essequibo River. It has been the subject of centuries of dispute which, sadly, have never taken into account the indigenous population
Instead, it has always been pretty much about resources. Gold mining is what drove British expansion westward (more on this below), and the recent discoveries of massive oil deposits led to Venezuela and Guyana raising tensions too
About time... Spain's @el_pais reports that the $3 billion in frozen Vzlan assets will soon be released. This was agreed to between the Venezuelan govt and opposition last November! But this thread is to point out the dishonest b.s. from the Spanish establishment's mouthpiece 🧵
This is the article in question:
It essentially relies on anonymous sources who say that the funds will soon be released. El País then covers this fairly straightforward report in a cloak of lies and misconceptionsenglish.elpais.com/international/…
So it begins. How dare Maduro want to access Venezuelan funds? Then it's incredibly disingenuous and racist to claim the govt wants to fix schools/hospitals to "polish its image." If a western govt builds a hospital, it's laudable. If Vzla does it it's to fool voters. GTFOH
🧵🧵Worse than a broken clock... Even when it wants to state the obvious, in this case that sanctions are a terrible and wrong policy, the @nytimes remains fully draped in US exceptionalism. The corporate media are an active front of the US empire (thread)
The article in question () is instantly off to a bad start. We are supposed to agree that Iran and NK should not have nuclear weapons, unlike the only country to ever use them. And would they also call the Iraq war an "egregious violation of intl laws"? https://t.co/ElNZjjKTlTtinyurl.com/3rmur79p
The end of the first section shows that this editorial is really not going anywhere since it's based on the outrageously false premise that the US should have some kind of god-given ability to impose murderous sanctions on other nations when it so pleases
🧵🧵🧵We just came across an incredible piece from the Financial Times (not in a good way). It has a remarkable blend of fallacious arguments, outright lies, bias, and lack of standards. This is a long thread, so bear with us!
This is the article in question from @FT (tinyurl.com/y32pmvtk). You can tell from the off that you're in for a ride because it's based on this assumption that the West "presses for free and fair elections" when this in fact has happened less frequently than Yeti sightings
FT "journalists" must get a bonus for every use of the word "authoritarian." It's not often that a piece starts w/ an outright falsehood, b/c "democracy" never left Venezuela, only the US didn't like election results. But this apocalyptic tone is worthy of a good chuckle
The US-backed Venezuelan opposition, which runs an imaginary parliament, wants a US court to declare a Venezuelan bond as invalid to try and soften the disaster brought by their complete bundling when in charge of CITGO
The strategy haw few chances of success, for several reasons, not least of them that when this National Assembly was actually running it *did not* formally declare the bond issued by the Maduro govt as illegal. A US-backed group was not about to challenge financial investors
.@Reuters will not let a short, straightforward piece get in the way of some outrageous lying. US sanctions have been classified as "collective punishment" against the Vzlan population, and these stenographer clowns write "sanctions against the Maduro govt" #SanctionsKill