As @BorisJohnson keeps digging on “high skill, high wage”, with an approach closer to East German communism than Californian capitalism, let’s look at who did well, how the UK did, & what we can learn.
Spoiler: Mr Johnson urgently needs to reconsider his failed Brexit.
A 🧵 /1.
What matters to people is what their wages can buy. And whether they’re being treated fairly.
Let’s look at the Federal Republic of Germany (“West Germany” until 1990) & the UK. With the USA as global benchmark. /2.
So, how’s that been going?
The attached chart of GDP per capita, adjusted for purchasing power & inflation, shows Germany
overtook the UK in the 1970s. They tracked each other through the era of UK EEC/EU membership for about 35 years. Until something happened. /3.
After the 2007/8 financial crash the UK was left badly behind.
The £ crashed from about €1.50 to about €1.10.
It recovered some of that ground then crashed again after David Cameron announced the EU referendum in November 2015. And after the June 2016 referendum itself. /4.
The UK has been failing relative to Germany, since the financial crash. And since the EU referendum announcement.
Germany’s success - it also tracked the USA well, while the UK fell away - happened in the EU.
As did the UK’s performance from the early 1970s to the crash. /5.
What about fairness?
UK inequality increased sharply under Thatcher/Major, dropped with Blair/Brown & increased again under Cameron etc.
Germany has had consistently lower, & more or less steady, inequality.
US inequality is consistently higher (much higher than Germany). /6.
There’s much talk about “cheap EU labour” reducing UK pay. Obviously, Germans can’t be meant - although 0.3 million Germans were resident in the UK in 2019. Perhaps the 0.8 million resident Poles? But look at what’s happened to per capita GDP in Poland compared to the UK. /7.
The EU cheap labour story is flaky. (And note: for the few years before the crash, UK per capita GDP still rose with Germany, yet Poland etc already had UK freedom of movement).
There’s a more obvious story. Failed post-crash economic policy. And a disastrous EU referendum. /8.
Perhaps you don’t like that story …
What’s undeniable is that Germany has outperformed the UK for over 70 years.
It’s done so while being in the EEC/EU for 65 years.
It’s a consistently richer, fairer society than the UK. /9.
The UK did well in the EEC for decades.
Individual greed doesn’t seem to have been the secret. UK inequality has fluctuated: it’s been consistently higher than in the more successful German economy. (And notably higher under the Conservatives than Labour). /10.
In short, Germany’s experience contains important lessons for the UK.
Unless you’re the USA, the global hyperpower (& perhaps even if you are):
▪️greed isn’t good
▪️the EU is
▪️go figure /11. End
If the US is anything other than fully committed, at great scale and in the pre-eminent leadership role, in NATO, Europe, the US and the world face disaster.
Bookmark that. /1.
More importantly, stop this madness.
There isn’t a way out of this, any more than there is a way of avoiding gravity on the surface of the Earth.
Cutting down US military presence in Europe has been a huge mistake. Successive US administrations are guilty. /2.
That needs to be reversed. It’s a large part of the reason for the mess we’re in. Globally, as well as in Europe.
Waiting a couple of years into a world war before committing to do anything about it is a stupendously bad idea, and grotesquely costly in lives and treasure. /3.
Donald Trump saying “Ukraine is finished” once again, starkly, highlights the question of what the world’s first & only (with the possible exception of Britain), & still remaining, hyper power would do geopolitically under his leadership.
But it isn’t just about Trump.
A 🧵/1.
I’ll be unashamedly Eurocentric.
There’s a broader & deeper story, of course. But Europe is a vital part of it.
The decision the USA has to make, as it did in the 1940s, & repeatedly at intervals after that, is whether it cares about Europe, & if so how much of it, & why. /2.
Does that include all of western Europe? Does it extend to central Europe? And eastern Europe? If so, should Ukraine be part of what the USA cares about (in the 40s that didn’t really play a role, given Ukraine’s status within the USSR)? And if so, how much of Ukraine? /3.
Brexit ripped us out of our $19 trillion GDP domestic market & reduced us to one a 6th of it, thumped our economy, fractured the UK, threw our governance into chaos, & generated perilous geopolitical effects.
And (if you mean it seriously) wildly naive about what actually takes place, legally (although you’d say “in my opinion this is unconstitutional”: good luck!) in the USA.
Still, if we just look at England/UK: yes, there are many concerns. /1.
I never said or, I hope, implied (to a fair, reasonable reader) that there weren’t.
For example (not the subject of my already long 🧵which focused on the way criminal incitement & freedom of expression relate) I personally deeply dislike revocation of citizenship. /2.
But you know that’s a thing in the USA as well, including for natural born citizens.
Involuntary self-revocation (in the guise of “voluntary relinquishment”) of citizenship sounds about as Kafkaesque as it gets.
But there it is, lurking malignantly in the Land of the Free. /3.
Twitter’s full of people trumpeting near zero understanding of English law or of the convictions in respect of the violence of the last 10 days or so.
Nor does the US 1st Amendment mean what many (often Americans) seem to think.
Frustrated? Maybe this will be some use.
A🧵/1.
“Incitement” was an offence under English common law pretty much forever.
In 2008 the Serious Crime Act 2007 replaced common law “incitement” with statutory offences of encouraging or assisting crime.
Incitement in respect of specific statutory offences remains. /2.
“Assisting” means roughly what you probably think it does. But, for clarity, it doesn’t require direct presence at the scene of the crime being “assisted”, or actions which are themselves part of that crime: if they assist the commission of it, that’s a criminal act itself. /3.