Hussein Aboubakr Mansour Profile picture
Oct 8, 2021 9 tweets 2 min read Read on X
The social history of the Middle East is much more interesting than most people think. In the 1960s, during a period of state-led westernization, the Arab feminist movement that led the effort for the liberalization of women took the lead in producing feminist antisemitism /1 Image
in various literary forms. The Iraqi female poet Nazik AlMala'eka produced a poem decrying miniskirts as a "Jewish innovation." The Lebanese radical feminist Leila AlBalabaki authored the novel "I live" in which she juxtaposed herself against a pregnant Jewish woman /2
whom she described as "the Jewess carrying an enemy, a butcher, while I'm carrying in my head the tragedies of a nation.. she is preparing the future of a despised people and I prepare in my head the fantasies of a meeting. Every day, she drops poison from her blood into /3
the veins of a misanthrope." Starting from the late 1960's, progressive feminism became part of the repertoire of then rising Marxist and nationalist terrorist movements, both Palestinian and Lebanese, and the type of female heroine/martyr who helps in murdering Jewish children/4 Image
was introduced. It was the Iranian Revolution and the following rise of reactionary Islamism that halted the tides of Arab feminism and restricted Arab female resistance to reproductive duties in the bedroom. I just thought this is an interesting part of the history /5
feminism and the history of Arab feminism that doesn't get told often, if at all. Please keep a critical distance between you and any isms!
I can add that Islamist feminism remained peripheral for decades until the recent return of Western left/feminist radicalism picked it back up and transformed it into a new hybrid seen in Sarsour, Omar, etc.
An NYT article from 1964 celebrating the feminism of Leyla Balabaki,
nytimes.com/1964/09/13/arc…
Also you may want to check this piece of work out, Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hussein Aboubakr Mansour

Hussein Aboubakr Mansour Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HusseinAboubak

Jun 30
The old left often came from children of working class families who were learned but not worldly. The New Left however came from the most affluent strata of both Western and Third World elites and this in great part explains why they cares more about psychosexual liberation, which they had the means to afford and enjoy while being a disastrous development for working class people who no longer have a family to mediate between them and the market forces.
Needless to say that the rise of such affluent New Left naturally negated any role of the working class and thus had to be replaced with identity politics, narcisstic personal narrative and brands of trauma assortments, in which these affluent kids can fit.
Even Third Worldism changed. We can in effect say there was an old Third Worldism, the Leninist fantasies of Nasser, Sukarno, Castro, etc. and a new Third Worldism of the new class of Third World elites who realized their decolonization was a catastrophe and migrated Westward.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 1
I recently realized that Darryl Cooper is not only the most popular writer on Substack but also a widely influential figure online. Curious about his appeal, I decided to listen to him, and accidentally I fell right into his account of Jewish history and Christianity (I don't know if that's all he does). Despite approaching it with good faith, particularly when he opened with the phrase “as a Christian,” I found the experience painful and couldn't go on past 20 mins or so. Within 20 minutes, he arrived at the astonishing claim that “the central conflict in all the Gospels” was about the Jews finally accepting the Gentiles. This is simply false. I have no idea where Cooper derives his theology from, but it bears little resemblance to any serious reading of the texts. The Gospels are not structured around this all. Their central conflict concerns the identity of Jesus himself—his claim to messiahship and divine sonship—and that is what culminated in his crucifixion. If this is his approach to all topics, then the man is creating a whole alternative reality that is parasitic on this one. That's not at all different than what leftist scholars have been doing for decades.
It was only 20 mins but the whole thing was bizarre. His understanding of Christian theology is that god basically designed for himself a pedagogical journey so he might experience those little dramas of those little humans. So God basically is Faust, in it for the experience!! It's so stupid you feel its some stupid Hollywood kitsch.
What I find heartbreaking is that the man had the heart to call himself a Christian as he was quite blatantly sacrificing the very heart of Christian theology (who is Jesus?), unequivocally throwing it out, in order to replace it with what is clearly obsessive antisemitism.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 1
This is happening in most museums I visited in the UK, Spain, and Germany. The informational plaques are often just exercises in narcissistic resentment talking about the white gaze, constructing whiteness, orientalizing, and all the cacophomisms that are clearly American in origin.
This was from the Thyssen museum in Madrid. Just read the bolded words Image
Currently, the Kurpfälzisches museum in Heidelberg has a special exhibition on Orientalism and the construction of whiteness. As a historical corrective, they staged portraits of a bunch of black people in European 16th-century attire to de-orientalize them. If I were black, I would have been very insulted.Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 20, 2024
There is a beautiful conflict that has been playing out between bourgeois Arabs whose path to white liberal status goes through the trauma of Western colonialism and others whose path to the same status goes through guilt over Islamic imperialism and terrorism.
Both paths ultimately involve achieving the same goal: elite liberal status, which is the contemporary form of whiteness. One strategy hinges on victimhood, the other on guilt. Still, both end up reinforcing the same liberal orthodoxy—essentially playing into the larger framework that privileges these narratives in the first place. They’re both trying to prove their worth to the same ideological gatekeepers but from different sides of the historical ledger.
Some less sophisticated ones are confused and alternate between both strategies. They don't quite get it.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 2, 2024
I have a lot of reservations about the New Atheists, especially with their atheism as a socio-cultural and political project, but their atheism remains a thousand times more preferable and acceptable than the radical Feuerbachean atheism of Žižek and Marxist thinkers. 🧵
The former, while locked in a truly cartoonish understanding of religion and of the self, remains infinitely more honest and safer. It is very cartoonishness is indeed a testimony to its sincerity.
Its superficiality makes it much safer, like a child who thinks he built his treehouse all on his own and doesn't know that the work was actually done by his father. What the child thinks is of secondary importance to the fact that the treehouse is sturdy and safe for the child.
Read 10 tweets
Jan 27, 2024
Israel should never concede real advantages in exchange for mere promises which their fulfillment is left to circumstance and good-will. The world of states is not determined by legal commitments or moral principles but by interest.
What determines the policy of the United States in the Middle East is not any moral or ideological considerations but how American interests in the region are conceived by Washington.
The only other considerations that historically qualified these considerations have always been the Jewish and later the Evangelical votes for the D and R respectively.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(