Michael Pettis Profile picture
Oct 10, 2021 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
1/7
Very interesting article. A series of Chinese studies may be discovering something about the high-speed rail system that France had already learned: rather than boost the economies of secondary cities, being connected...

scmp.com/news/china/sci… via @SCMPNews
2/7
to the HSR may actually reduce economic activity and encourage a brain drain. Even patent applications in secondary cities have dropped significantly, according to one study, after the city was connected to a high-speed line.
3/7
If this is true, it undermines the claim that even if much of the HSR is not economically viable today, it will generate enough growth in the less economically advanced areas to become viable in the future. The value of HSR is more likely to decline than to increase.
4/7
This reinforces a point I have made many times before, including in the linked essay. The idea that concentrating investment in poorer regions will drive economic convergence is based on a confusion about what drives growth.

carnegieendowment.org/chinafinancial…
5/7
Poorer regions are usually poorer because their social, economic, legal, and cultural institutions prevent businesses and workers from being able to absorb high levels of capital productively.
6/7
In that case more investment only generates sustainable growth when these regions are relatively underinvested, and this doesn't mean relative to more advanced regions but rather relative to their own specific institutional capacity (what I call the Hirschman level).
7/7
Once each region has as much investment as it can productively absorb — and in China most regions reached that point well over a decade ago — more investment doesn't help. What it needs is more institutional reform.
1/4
The point of this thread is not to suggest that investment in HSR, or capital deepening more generally, is economically a bad idea. It is in fact often a very good idea – for example infrastructure investment in China in the 1990s, or in the US today – but we should ...
2/4
understand both the conditions under which it can accelerate economic development and those under which further economic development will not occur without the right institutional reforms, in which case further capital deepening can actually reduce future growth.
3/4
As a corollary, the longer an investment-driven growth model has proven successful, the more politically entrenched it is likely to become – that is certainly what the historical precedents suggest – but in fact the less successful it is likely to be...
4/4
in the future as it closes the gap between actual investment and the amount of investment the region can productively absorb.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

May 22
1/12
This Liberty Street account of trade makes the same mistakes most mainstream American economists make when it comes to explaining the US trade deficit.

libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2025/05/why-do…
2/12
Thomas Klitgaard notes, correctly, that by definition the US current account is equal to the excess of US investment over US savings.

But then he insists that causality can only run in one direction: from the internal account to the external account.
3/12
In other words, he claims that US savings and US investment are both determined by domestic factors (mainly low US savings), and because the former is less than the latter, the US must turn to foreigners to fill the gap.
Read 12 tweets
May 21
1/9
Martin Wolf says the world has three options in considering the future of the hegemonic role of the dollar. One is "continued domination by the dollar". Another is that some other currency, perhaps the euro or even the renminbi, replace it as hegemon.

ft.com/content/d96568…
2/9
And the third is "a world with two or three competing currencies, each dominant in different regions."

The first option means maintaining the existing system, with all it problems, but I suspect that this may be much easier said than done.
3/9
Since the GFC, there has been a transformation of the way in which we think about the global trade and capital regime, along with a growing bipartisan consensus in the US that the costs to the US economy, and especially to its manufacturing sector, have become unsustainable.
Read 9 tweets
May 19
1/8
In what has become a pattern, China showed stronger-than-expected growth in industrial output in April and weaker-then-expected growth in retail sales. The former was up 6.1% while the latter was up 5.1%.english.news.cn/20250519/9d382…
2/8
This suggests that for all the talk, it is still proving very difficult for China to increase consumption in line with production, which is why China must continue to expand investment (with much of it directed into manufacturing) and run massive trade surpluses.
3/8
The growth in industrial output shows that while people like Valdis Dombrovskis are asking China to show self restraint, in fact the focus on expanding manufacturing output continues to dominate Beijing's growth strategy, and it is hard for the economy to back away.
Read 8 tweets
May 19
1/9
Bloomberg reports EU economy chief Valdis Dombrovskis as saying: “At this stage it’s important that China is showing some self restraint in terms of this...
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/9
trade diversion, because if it will start flooding other markets, that would mean that we would also need to protect our market, our companies, our jobs.”

But what is "self restraint" in this context?
3/9
It is not as if China is running huge trade surpluses out of malice. It is a structural problem. A high-savings high-investment economy must always run trade surpluses to balance its high savings once it begins to reach the limit of the investment it can productively absorb.
Read 9 tweets
May 18
1/11
SCMP: "Beijing is doubling down on efforts to create a stronger domestic market, as it focuses on reducing China’s vulnerability to external tariff shocks. Premier Li Qiang said on Thursday that...
scmp.com/economy?module…
2/11
China would continue to anchor its development strategy in bolstering “domestic circulation” – a concept that refers to strengthening the country’s economic self-reliance by creating a robust, unified domestic market"
3/11
That may sound plausible on the surface, but there is a contradiction between strengthening "domestic circulation" while maintaining "external circulation".
ft.com/content/a9572b…
Read 11 tweets
May 15
1/4
Total social finance grew in April by RMB 1.16 trillion, a little less than expected. Some analysts suggest that this is because of a weak economy, but it could also reflect higher-quality growth, i.e. one driven less by non-productive investment.
english.news.cn/20250514/ff688…
2/4
Overall debt numbers still remain very worrying. Total TSF grew by RMB 16.3 trillion in the first four months of 2025, which suggests that it required an increase in debt equal to 35% of GDP to boost nominal GDP growth by 4%. Of course debt increases in the first four...
3/4
months of the year typically account for roughly 40% of the annual increase, but if this pattern holds in 2025, it suggests that it will still require an increase in debt equal to 29% of GDP to boost nominal GDP growth by 4%. That's a lot of debt per unit of growth.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(