1/7 Very interesting article. A series of Chinese studies may be discovering something about the high-speed rail system that France had already learned: rather than boost the economies of secondary cities, being connected...
2/7 to the HSR may actually reduce economic activity and encourage a brain drain. Even patent applications in secondary cities have dropped significantly, according to one study, after the city was connected to a high-speed line.
3/7 If this is true, it undermines the claim that even if much of the HSR is not economically viable today, it will generate enough growth in the less economically advanced areas to become viable in the future. The value of HSR is more likely to decline than to increase.
4/7 This reinforces a point I have made many times before, including in the linked essay. The idea that concentrating investment in poorer regions will drive economic convergence is based on a confusion about what drives growth.
5/7 Poorer regions are usually poorer because their social, economic, legal, and cultural institutions prevent businesses and workers from being able to absorb high levels of capital productively.
6/7 In that case more investment only generates sustainable growth when these regions are relatively underinvested, and this doesn't mean relative to more advanced regions but rather relative to their own specific institutional capacity (what I call the Hirschman level).
7/7 Once each region has as much investment as it can productively absorb — and in China most regions reached that point well over a decade ago — more investment doesn't help. What it needs is more institutional reform.
1/4 The point of this thread is not to suggest that investment in HSR, or capital deepening more generally, is economically a bad idea. It is in fact often a very good idea – for example infrastructure investment in China in the 1990s, or in the US today – but we should ...
2/4 understand both the conditions under which it can accelerate economic development and those under which further economic development will not occur without the right institutional reforms, in which case further capital deepening can actually reduce future growth.
3/4 As a corollary, the longer an investment-driven growth model has proven successful, the more politically entrenched it is likely to become – that is certainly what the historical precedents suggest – but in fact the less successful it is likely to be...
4/4 in the future as it closes the gap between actual investment and the amount of investment the region can productively absorb.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/4 I just finished Martin Daunton's excellent survey and analysis of the last 100 years of globalization. There is an enormous amount of material here (nearly 900 pages) and it may not be an easy read for those who aren't already very familiar with much of this history.
2/4 But for those who are, or who want to be, it's well worth the effort. While the book is ostensibly about the process of globalization, and the role of government and government institutions in that process, especially in pivotal periods during the 1930-40s, the 1970s and...
3/4 in the past decade, a major theme is the enormous distortions caused by the unfettered flow of capital, the ways in which these flows dislocated domestic economies, and the various (mostly unsuccessful) attempts individually and collectively to control them.
1/4 Good John Authers article on business profits in the US: "After-tax profits account for an unprecedented 10.7% of gross domestic product, when in the last 50 years of the 20th century, they never exceeded 8%."
@johnauthers_ bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
2/4 "The only time approaching their current share of the economy was in 1929 on the eve of the Great Crash. If the nation is to deal with inequality, money must be redistributed from somewhere; corporate profits are an obvious source of funds."
3/4 Speaking of 1929, we need to re-read Marriner Eccles (FDR's Fed chairman) on the relationship between income inequality, weak domestic demand, rising debt needed to boost domestic demand, and the eventual collapse in production once rising debt can no longer be sustained.
1/4 Caixin: "China is in dire need of more domestic consumption as global uncertainties hamper external demand. Key to this is increasing incomes, a Chinese economics professor said at the Summer Davos Forum in Tianjin on Thursday."
2/4 It's good that there is finally a consensus that low consumption is China's most serious economic problem, and the main cause of its other problems (soaring debt, deflation, overinvestment in infrastructure and manufacturing, over-reliance on a rising trade surplus).
3/4 It's also good that there's a growing consensus that the only sustainable way to raise consumption is to raise household incomes.
But it isn't yet fully acknowledged that China doesn't need rising consumption per se so much as rising consumption relative to GDP.
1/15
Kenneth Rogoff says: "There is, for example, a terrific chapter in which Ray Dalio brutally critiques Japanese policymakers for failing to force debt writedowns after the country’s early 1990s financial crisis.'
2/15
"Instead," he continues, "they allowed debt overhang to hamstring the financial system and sap two decades of growth."
I haven't read Dalio's book, but this is an extremely important point, and one that Beijing should note.
3/15
Beijing has an enormous of debt that is ostensibly backed by the book value of associated assets (most Chinese debt was used to fund investment), but the economic value of these assets are not worth nearly as much as their book value. ft.com/content/630f82…
1/6 FT: "The value of Chinese exports to Europe in May climbed 12 per cent from a year earlier, with shipments to Germany up 22 per cent. Exports to south-east Asian countries rose 15 per cent."
2/6 The world is already complaining about the disruptions caused by this flood of Chinese exports away from the US to the rest of the world, especially to Europe. But this so far has been the easy part of the global trade adjustment. It will get much worse.
3/6 The Trump administration so far has been unable to bring down the US trade deficit, and as long as the US trade deficit rises, it is much easier for other countries to absorb rising trade deficits with China as these are balanced with rising trade surpluses with the US.
1/7 SCMP: "Hunan has become the first province in China to use the proceeds of special-purpose bonds to guarantee government payments to... scmp.com/economy/china-…
2/7 enterprises, with 20 billion yuan allocated for this year. This marks the first time the bonds – typically earmarked for revenue-generating construction projects – will be used to cover government arrears."
3/7 A large number of local governments have huge amounts of undeclared debt which they cannot service, including arrears to businesses and various complicated forms of triangular deb and cross-debt guarantees.