Michael Pettis Profile picture
Oct 10, 2021 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
1/7
Very interesting article. A series of Chinese studies may be discovering something about the high-speed rail system that France had already learned: rather than boost the economies of secondary cities, being connected...

scmp.com/news/china/sci… via @SCMPNews
2/7
to the HSR may actually reduce economic activity and encourage a brain drain. Even patent applications in secondary cities have dropped significantly, according to one study, after the city was connected to a high-speed line.
3/7
If this is true, it undermines the claim that even if much of the HSR is not economically viable today, it will generate enough growth in the less economically advanced areas to become viable in the future. The value of HSR is more likely to decline than to increase.
4/7
This reinforces a point I have made many times before, including in the linked essay. The idea that concentrating investment in poorer regions will drive economic convergence is based on a confusion about what drives growth.

carnegieendowment.org/chinafinancial…
5/7
Poorer regions are usually poorer because their social, economic, legal, and cultural institutions prevent businesses and workers from being able to absorb high levels of capital productively.
6/7
In that case more investment only generates sustainable growth when these regions are relatively underinvested, and this doesn't mean relative to more advanced regions but rather relative to their own specific institutional capacity (what I call the Hirschman level).
7/7
Once each region has as much investment as it can productively absorb — and in China most regions reached that point well over a decade ago — more investment doesn't help. What it needs is more institutional reform.
1/4
The point of this thread is not to suggest that investment in HSR, or capital deepening more generally, is economically a bad idea. It is in fact often a very good idea – for example infrastructure investment in China in the 1990s, or in the US today – but we should ...
2/4
understand both the conditions under which it can accelerate economic development and those under which further economic development will not occur without the right institutional reforms, in which case further capital deepening can actually reduce future growth.
3/4
As a corollary, the longer an investment-driven growth model has proven successful, the more politically entrenched it is likely to become – that is certainly what the historical precedents suggest – but in fact the less successful it is likely to be...
4/4
in the future as it closes the gap between actual investment and the amount of investment the region can productively absorb.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

Oct 18
1/8
China’s problem continues to be not the level of growth in economic activity (i.e. GDP) but rather the quality of that activity. China’s real GDP in 2024-Q3 grew by 4.6% year on year, versus 5.5% in Q1 and 4.7% in Q2.

caixinglobal.com/2024-10-18/chi…
2/8
During first three quarters of the year it grew by 4.8%. This suggests to me that Beijing should be able to achieve 4.8-4.9% this year without a major last-minute stimulus, and this is within the range of what I always interpreted to be “about 5%”.
3/8
The good news is that household income grew in line with GDP. The bad news is that the main proxies for consumption continued to struggle. Retail sales grew by 3.2% in September, and by 3.3% in the first three quarters of 2024, versus...
Read 8 tweets
Oct 14
1/7
SCMP cites Huo Jianguo, former head of a think tank under China’s Ministry of Commerce, as saying at a conference Friday that he is worried about China’s persistent trade surpluses and suggesting that “one way to mitigate the problem would be to...

scmp.com/news/china/dip…
2/7
foster more joint ventures” in the EU.

He is partly right. The whole purpose of tariffs is to shift production from abroad to the country imposing the tariffs, and if the EU believes the EV industry to be of strategic importance, it will benefit from such a shift.
3/7
But while this allows Chinese EV producers to maintain revenues, it doesn’t change China's underlying savings imbalances, as Huo himself recognizes. These will barely be affected by shifting EV production abroad, so that China must still run the same trade surpluses.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 13
1/7
I was finally able to get a copy of @IsabellaMWeber‘s book and just finished reading it. I of course expected it to be a very interesting book, but it is even better and more important than I expected. Image
2/7
The point of the book is to describe the messy and complicated process of liberalization and price reform China underwent in the first decade or so of “opening up and reform”, and the story Weber tells is a fascinating one. But there are at least two other stories here.
3/7
The first has to do with the way economic policy is made, and Weber here adds American economic history and earlier Chinese economic history to distinguish between policy made by those who follow what the Chinese called...
Read 7 tweets
Oct 13
1/6
The East is Red has translated an interesting recent article by Xu Gao in which he says: "The pursuit of GDP growth by local governments is not misguided. GDP isn't just a quantity indicator of economic output; it also serves as a quality...

eastisread.com/p/xu-gao-china…
2/6
indicator, reflecting how people assess the achievements of economic development. This is because GDP represents the total market value of all final outputs, calculated at market prices."

I think this is where much of the disagreement over GDP growth lies.
3/6
GDP does (broadly) represent the total market value of all final outputs, calculated at market prices, but only in those sectors of the economy that operate under hard-budget constraints. It does not in those parts that operate under soft-budget constraints.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 13
1/14
Actually I think across-the-board import tariffs, if properly implemented, can indeed reverse the US role in accommodating global savings and trade imbalances, but as I've said many times before, they are the least efficient way, in part because they are very blunt...
2/14
instruments that target all trade partners equally, regardless of whether or not they are the sources of the imbalances. What is more, bilateral import tariffs are almost totally useless in rebalancing trade, as are, more generally, trade policies directed just at China.
3/14
What has to change is the US role in accommodating global imbalances. The point is that countries that maintain open capital and trade accounts have no choice but to import the obverse trade and industrial policies of their trade partners, which means that US...
Read 14 tweets
Oct 12
1/4
Today's press briefing by Finance Minister Lan Fo’an is over, and while many will be happy to hear that we can expect more "countercyclical measures", I suspect most investors will be disappointed by the lack of numbers and details on current stimulus plans.
2/4
As an aside I should point out that while I too was expecting more details on spending, and more spending, I don't think it a bad thing if Beijing shows restraint and allows GDP growth to come in below this year's target.
3/4
In fact I'd argue that growth closer to 4.5% this year would actually be a good thing because it would indicate that Beijing is becoming less obsessed about the unsustainable GDP growth targets that have led directly to its massive over-investment and surging debt.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(