Matt & Noah have pointed to this paper ('Effects of Parental and Sibling Incarceration: Evidence from Ohio') as an example of an econ paper reaching a right-wing conclusion (incarceration of parents has positive externalities) the left reflexively opposes
aeaweb.org/articles?id=10…
Norris et al. try a real-world "quasi-experiment" based on sentencing disparities among Ohio judges

In the intro, the authors point to an Ohio-peculiar detail (in Ohio gov't aid isn't cut off from convicted felons) and a bleak remark about how prison increases TANF eligibility
The authors say they examined 1.9 criminal cases from 1990–2017 involving 670,000 defendants and their families

They conclude that children who are age 0–16 when a parent is first incarcerated are about ~5% less likely to later be incarcerated themselves

s3.documentcloud.org/documents/4641…
Theauthors find similar results among siblings. But there are important caveats:
-the result only holds up for the poorest families
-the result only holds for the shortest prison sentences
-the result only holds well for incarcerated mothers, not parents in general
...
-the result holds for children of parents having a first-time contact with the criminal justice system
-the children of incarcerated parents are found to have lower school enrolment & school achievement, and higher teen pregnancy rate

the authors conclude incarceration is *bad*
I mean, this is buried in the supplemental data, but:
Also...Ohio has the third highest rate of parental incarceration (behind Indiana and Kentucky, where ~13% (!!) of parents of young children have been in prison) half of all incarcerated parents in Ohio come from the poorest 16% of neighborhoods. woof:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with עלי שלכת

עלי שלכת Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SababaUSA

30 Aug
Re-upping bc this is pretty comical—

the invention of the modern vice presidency was a comedy of errors

first, the Committee of Eleven comes up with the idea for the electoral college, but they're worried electors will always vote for candidates from their home state, so…
/1
…James Madison hatches the idea that every elector shall have two votes to cast for president, and only one such vote may be cast for a home-state candidate

Veep was basically invented as a reason to justify this two-vote method. The runner-up for pres would be veep… /2
…Further, veep was therefore thought the right position for presidential successor-in-waiting for vacancies because the veep would be the presidential runner-up

But what is the veep's job? The main reason they put veep in the senate is…they couldn't think of anything else…
/3
Read 7 tweets
28 Aug
I've taken a cursory look at the ivermectin phenomenon, and there's one figure who seems central to its initial rise: Sen. Ron Johnson /1
Hydroxychloroquine started trending almost immediately in the first week of March 2020. The spikes on Google Trends coincide with Trump tweets, (linked below)
There are also spikes for dexamethasone and regeneron around Trump's hospitalization

/2

thetrumparchive.com/?searchbox=%22… Image
Ivermectin first spikes in December 2020 coinciding with a committee hearing called by Ron Johnson, where ivermectin was discussed extensively /3

madison.com/wsj/news/local…

c-span.org/video/?507035-…
Read 8 tweets
11 Feb
It's fine, obviously, to look for some perspective and ask critically whether today's conspiratorial thinking is appreciably different from the past, but this doesn't hold up to even cursory analysis (beside that I think the attached graphic is bogus)
First, in Oct. 2020, Morning Consult found that 24% of polled adults thought Qanon somewhat accurate or very accurate. Among those who approve of Trump it was 42%, and among those who strongly approve it was 46% (28% say "very accurate")

assets.morningconsult.com/wp-uploads/202…
Second, it's obvious that Qanon had and has major purchase in the Republican mainstream, including lawmakers and including *the last president* who left office three weeks ago. It's an eliminationist ideology that elicited an actual mob attack on the government itself
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(