This book was read a lot in 1939, it should be read a lot now too. It's later than you think.
It's in the @internetarchive, open access. I end my Trump book by quoting a lot of Max Lerner.
Lerner wrote a lot of books, was a leading public intellectual of his day. Ideas Are Weapons is another great book. He's to the left of Dewey in the Dewey-Lippmann debate, which should be taught as the Lerner-Dewey-Lippmann debate. (which is how I teach it now).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jennifer Mercieca

Jennifer Mercieca Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jenmercieca

13 Oct
Hitler on the power of symbols & why he chose a Swastika, from Mein Kampf: “Up till then the movement had possessed no party badge and no party flag. The lack of these tokens was not only a disadvantage at that time but would prove intolerable in the future." 1/10
"The disadvantages were chiefly that members of the party possessed no outward broken of membership which linked them together, and it was absolutely unthinkable that for the future they should remain without some token which would be a symbol of the movement and" 2/10
"could be set against that of the International. And it is to this way of thinking that the black, white and red colours of the old REICH are indebted for their resurrection as the flag of our so-called national bourgeois parties." 3/10
Read 15 tweets
11 Oct
Democratic Practitioners Want an Answer to the Question: Who’s Responsible for Scammy Emails? campaignsandelections.com/campaigntech/d…
Here's the request letter mentioned in the article. I'm glad to see some political consultants are concerned about email scam ethics: juggernautproject.com/wp-content/upl…
‘Scam’ Political Groups Try New Tricks—and Rake In Millions thedailybeast.com/scam-political… via @thedailybeast
Read 4 tweets
10 Oct
Hey #AcademicTwitter, we're hiring! Texas A&M Department of Communication has TWO open rank positions. We're looking for folks doing social science research in media studies, health comm, organizational comm, journalism, political comm: apply.interfolio.com/94793
Also, we're recruiting for the ACES Fellows (a fellowship that turns into a tt position). Information here: Accountability, Climate, Equity, and Scholarship Faculty Fellows (ACES): apply.interfolio.com/91718
Anyway, Texas is weird, but our department is really decent. And it's cheap to live here! You can have your dream house/farm for less than a starter home in most places.
Read 4 tweets
10 Oct
I think about this article a lot. The real Lord of the Flies boys were cooperative and helped one another survive: theguardian.com/books/2020/may…
"Our secret superpower is our ability to cooperate": Rutger Bregman: the Dutch historian who rocked Davos and unearthed the real Lord of the Flies theguardian.com/books/2020/may…
Also this: "And so, in the end, men are brought to that most tragically ironic of all divisions, or conflicts, wherein millions of cooperative acts go into the preparation for one single destructive act. We refer to that ultimate disease of cooperation: war.” (Burke, RoM, 22)
Read 5 tweets
4 Oct
No scholar of deliberative democracy or democratic deliberation would make "engagement" a metric for designing a deliberative process. We use these platforms for democracy, but they were never designed for that. What kind of platform would be good for democracy? Build that.
FB's response via @brianstelter. This is what's called "eulogistic covering," using a positive term (democracy here) to cover over a negative motive (economic self-interest here). FB isn't interested in democracy or people expressing themselves.
In 2016 FB could pretend it didn't know about its negative effects, but it can't in 2021: "I think the idea that fake news on Facebook, of which it’s a very small amount of the content, influenced the election in any way, I think is a pretty crazy idea."
techonomy.com/conf/te16/vide…
Read 5 tweets
2 Oct
When I was in grad school the prof who taught rhetorical theory (a man who grew up on the rough side of Chicago & read 7+ languages) warned us against reading a book preface or introduction. "Just read the damn text. Think for yourself damnit," he'd say. I think about that a lot.
The preface of a translation tells you what to think about the text. It's someone else's judgment about what the text means, why it's important, what you should learn from it. It frames your understanding. As a reader it positions you to look for & see what you're told to see.
It was fine for undergrads to read the preface, but grad students had to form their own opinions about what a text meant, if or why it was important, and what was meaningful. He wanted us to start from the beginning and figure it out for ourselves.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(