Fun note from Eric Smith just now: The SAME driver who drove all of the JWST mirrors across the country drove the truck with fully assembled JWST onto the boat. Been with project a long time!
Salute to you, Driver. A critical part of the JWST team.
I mean, arguably one of the most critical. 🤷♂️
I mean, I'm kinda tearing up just thinking about it. Same driver got to send it on its last earthbound journey. 😢
The plan for media events before the big day
Eric: NASA will be VERY active in comms during the transit to L2 and unfolding / commissioning phase. "Social media abhors a vacuum; if we're not providing information, *disinformation* will fill it".
Post-launch timeline
First 30 days after launch
Solar array deployment is most time-critical step. On battery power until then. Supplemental burn for course correction to correct L2 orbit is similarly time critical. MCC burn MUST happen on time. 1a, 1b burns are optional. The shorter they are, the better for science lifetime.
Need and length of these burns depends on how accurately the Arianne 5 inserts JWST into orbit. Fingers crossed they won't be needed - that fuel can be used to extend the mission lifetime at L2.
Sunshield deployment, another ultra-critical step, begins at L+3 days.
Following sunshield deployment, this is the modeled cooling curve.
Some surfaces are intentionally kept warmer for longer to prevent condensation from outgassing
"The first image we get from JWST will *not* be a 'beautiful one'". There are 18 segments that will need to be aligned / focused. Those activities happen late in cooling, at L+2 month point.
By day ~118, you have a well-focused telescope. REMIND YOUR COMMUNITY that it will take some time to get that first "WOW" image from JWST.
('-')7
Margaret Meixner asks about comms plan before telescope is fully cooled/focused.
A: Project Science will have a blog during commissioning, with weekly updates.
The *real* First Light image won't be pretty. An out-of-focus astrometric field.
The "official" front-page @nytimes gorgeous First Light image from a focused telescope will come later.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To protect our beloved, overworked meetings team, and because we only have ~2% active participation in a virtual component that costs >$200,000, we need to make major changes to how we do Hybrid. (1/n)
In consultation with our friends on @AAS_WGAD and our Future of Meetings Task Force, we're asking for your thoughts on how we can more effectively incorporate virtual participants in our future meetings. We have many more details in this blog post:
@AAS_WGAD Here's the data for our past three hybrid meetings. The *majority* of Zoom rooms for the past three meetings have sat nearly or totally empty. Virtual presenters have unknowingly given talks to empty rooms. Glitches are frequent, even though we have a vendor-supported platform.
We will build and fly a new constellation of Great Observatories, beginning with the Habitable Worlds Observatory. It will pursue life beyond earth, and with the power of a fleet including X-ray and FIR Great Observatories, we will tell the story of life in the Universe.
We can’t do this without a grassroots community coalition to advocate for the fleet at all fractal levels, from chats with a student to advocacy amongst stakeholders and policy makers. Join us here greatobservatories.org
Want to get involved now? We need you! Join NASA’s New Great Observatories Science Analysis Group by Jan 15. greatobservatories.org/sag
Your AAS registration fee is very high. It's a huge barrier to participation. We're (quite literally) not allowed to bankrupt the society, but we can start a dialog about fees.
Hosting #AAS241 will cost us at least $1,612,249. We'll lose money or *barely* break even (1/n)
The largest expense by far is our collection of (excellent! professional!) A/V vendors, to whom we'll pay $424,000. Making the meeting hybrid effectively doubles their quote, i.e. adds about $200,000 to the total meeting cost. There is almost zero price competition in this space.
There is basically no compelling argument why a conference that costs you $700 in reg fee alone shouldn't provide you stable, fast wifi throughout the meeting. And so we will pay $147,000 to provide "free" WiFi throughout all venues. We have zero negotiating power here.
.@chandraxray's *real* First Light vs. the "public" First Light. The former is so much more epochal and emotional. But it's hard to explain to the public why it looks cruddy. JWST going through this right now, but the People Who've Seen It are absolutely overjoyed.
@chandraxray I've only ever seen two true First Lights: MUSE and SPHERE on @ESO's Very Large Telescope. There were lots of tears and hugs. A technical achievement that becomes a human moment *real* fast. I can't imagine what it must've been like to be in the MOC earlier this week.
The absolute first Chandra image. Leon X-1 (the source in my first tweet) is circle #5. Now you get why the big splashy media release First Lights are of more immediately spectacular things. But this is the real moment.