Hitler on the power of symbols & why he chose a Swastika, from Mein Kampf: “Up till then the movement had possessed no party badge and no party flag. The lack of these tokens was not only a disadvantage at that time but would prove intolerable in the future." 1/10
"The disadvantages were chiefly that members of the party possessed no outward broken of membership which linked them together, and it was absolutely unthinkable that for the future they should remain without some token which would be a symbol of the movement and" 2/10
"could be set against that of the International. And it is to this way of thinking that the black, white and red colours of the old REICH are indebted for their resurrection as the flag of our so-called national bourgeois parties." 3/10
"It was obvious that the symbol of a régime which had been overthrown by the Marxists under inglorious circumstances was not now worthy to serve as a banner under which the same Marxism was to be crushed in its turn. However much any decent German may love and revere" 4/10
"those old colours, glorious when placed side by side in their youthful freshness, when he had fought under them and seen the sacrifice of so many lives, that flag had little value for the struggle of the future. After innumerable trials I decided upon a final form" 5/10
"a flag of red material with a white disc bearing in its centre a black swastika. After many trials I obtained the correct proportions between the dimensions of the flag & of the white central disc, as well as that of the swastika. And this is how it has remained ever since" 6/10
"At the same time we immediately ordered the corresponding armlets for our squad of men who kept order at meetings, armlets of red material, a central white disc with the black swastika upon it. And indeed a symbol it proved to be." 7/10
"Not only because it incorporated those revered colours expressive of our homage to the glorious past and which once brought so much honour to the German nation, but this symbol was also an eloquent expression of the will behind the movement." 8/10
"We National Socialists regarded our flag as being the embodiment of our party programme. The red expressed the social thought underlying the movement. White the national thought." 9/10
"And the swastika signified the mission allotted to us--the struggle for the victory of Aryan mankind and at the same time the triumph of the ideal of creative work which is in itself and always will be anti-Semitic.” END
Just wanted to provide a little context since I see swastika is trending. 😳
Here's a N*zi rally in New York in 1939:
Stage had Washington posing in between two swastikas. 😳
Hitler tells you that a swastika will always be anti-Semitic (even if it's made from needles):
"the struggle for the victory of Aryan mankind and at the same time the triumph of the ideal of creative work which is in itself and always will be anti-Semitic."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Jennifer Mercieca

Jennifer Mercieca Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jenmercieca

13 Oct
This book was read a lot in 1939, it should be read a lot now too. It's later than you think.
It's in the @internetarchive, open access. I end my Trump book by quoting a lot of Max Lerner.
Read 4 tweets
11 Oct
Democratic Practitioners Want an Answer to the Question: Who’s Responsible for Scammy Emails? campaignsandelections.com/campaigntech/d…
Here's the request letter mentioned in the article. I'm glad to see some political consultants are concerned about email scam ethics: juggernautproject.com/wp-content/upl…
‘Scam’ Political Groups Try New Tricks—and Rake In Millions thedailybeast.com/scam-political… via @thedailybeast
Read 4 tweets
10 Oct
Hey #AcademicTwitter, we're hiring! Texas A&M Department of Communication has TWO open rank positions. We're looking for folks doing social science research in media studies, health comm, organizational comm, journalism, political comm: apply.interfolio.com/94793
Also, we're recruiting for the ACES Fellows (a fellowship that turns into a tt position). Information here: Accountability, Climate, Equity, and Scholarship Faculty Fellows (ACES): apply.interfolio.com/91718
Anyway, Texas is weird, but our department is really decent. And it's cheap to live here! You can have your dream house/farm for less than a starter home in most places.
Read 4 tweets
10 Oct
I think about this article a lot. The real Lord of the Flies boys were cooperative and helped one another survive: theguardian.com/books/2020/may…
"Our secret superpower is our ability to cooperate": Rutger Bregman: the Dutch historian who rocked Davos and unearthed the real Lord of the Flies theguardian.com/books/2020/may…
Also this: "And so, in the end, men are brought to that most tragically ironic of all divisions, or conflicts, wherein millions of cooperative acts go into the preparation for one single destructive act. We refer to that ultimate disease of cooperation: war.” (Burke, RoM, 22)
Read 5 tweets
4 Oct
No scholar of deliberative democracy or democratic deliberation would make "engagement" a metric for designing a deliberative process. We use these platforms for democracy, but they were never designed for that. What kind of platform would be good for democracy? Build that.
FB's response via @brianstelter. This is what's called "eulogistic covering," using a positive term (democracy here) to cover over a negative motive (economic self-interest here). FB isn't interested in democracy or people expressing themselves.
In 2016 FB could pretend it didn't know about its negative effects, but it can't in 2021: "I think the idea that fake news on Facebook, of which it’s a very small amount of the content, influenced the election in any way, I think is a pretty crazy idea."
Read 5 tweets
2 Oct
When I was in grad school the prof who taught rhetorical theory (a man who grew up on the rough side of Chicago & read 7+ languages) warned us against reading a book preface or introduction. "Just read the damn text. Think for yourself damnit," he'd say. I think about that a lot.
The preface of a translation tells you what to think about the text. It's someone else's judgment about what the text means, why it's important, what you should learn from it. It frames your understanding. As a reader it positions you to look for & see what you're told to see.
It was fine for undergrads to read the preface, but grad students had to form their own opinions about what a text meant, if or why it was important, and what was meaningful. He wanted us to start from the beginning and figure it out for ourselves.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!