For folks who can't make my #rEDSurrey21 presentation on developing expert teaching, here's a short summary:
↓
The most expert teachers help pupils learn 4x faster than the least expert (Wiliam, 2016).
Teaching expertise is a thing worth investing in.
However, getting better at many aspects of teaching is hard to do via experience alone (Kraft & Papay, 2016).
This is why formal teacher development is so important.
However, the quality of teacher development is highly variable. There are a few bright spots, but most programmes have little impact, and some are even detrimental (Fletcher-Wood & Zuccolo, 2020).
There's room for improvement.
For me, improvement begins with establishing clarity around:
→ What expertise is
→ How we can systematically develop it
Expertise is reliably strong performance against the core tasks that a teacher faces (Ericsson et al, 2018).
While the core tasks of teaching are the same for every teacher, the strategies needed to tackle them are unique.
Our ability to tackle the core tasks of any role is a product of the 'mental model' that we possess.
'Mental model' is just a fancy term for 'what teachers know and how that knowledge is organised to guide perception, decision and action'.
We can systematically build teaching expertise around these core tasks by employing a set of essential development processes (or 'mechanisms').
👊
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Pedagogical Fit (and how it relates to adaptive expertise)
One of my fav ideas:
↓
What our students pay attention to and think about is what they end up learning.
There are a variety of tools we can deploy to guide thinking, some better (such as elaboration or retrieval), some worse (such as learning styles and brain gym).
However, effective teaching is not just about having the right tools to hand, it’s also about choosing the right tool for the job.
Prompting students to externalise their thinking through activities such as talking, writing, or drawing can enhance learning.
This works by focusing attention, strengthening encoding, and fostering clarity of thought.
During externalisation, if we prompt students to expand upon new ideas, integrate them with prior knowledge, or organise them in more meaningful ways, we can help them to deepen their understanding and better apply it to new situations.
The myth of learning styles is pervasive across society (and even education). But what exactly makes it so attractive?
One compelling—albeit more theoretical than empirical—argument is that such concepts hold a modern-day ‘moral appeal’.
We live in a society that places a high value on individuality, personal choice, and the inherent superiority of natural traits.
Understandably so—these are the cornerstones of liberal democracy and romanticism, the grand narratives upon which many Western nations have been built.