For folks who can't make my #rEDSurrey21 presentation on developing expert teaching, here's a short summary:
↓
The most expert teachers help pupils learn 4x faster than the least expert (Wiliam, 2016).
Teaching expertise is a thing worth investing in.
However, getting better at many aspects of teaching is hard to do via experience alone (Kraft & Papay, 2016).
This is why formal teacher development is so important.
However, the quality of teacher development is highly variable. There are a few bright spots, but most programmes have little impact, and some are even detrimental (Fletcher-Wood & Zuccolo, 2020).
There's room for improvement.
For me, improvement begins with establishing clarity around:
→ What expertise is
→ How we can systematically develop it
Expertise is reliably strong performance against the core tasks that a teacher faces (Ericsson et al, 2018).
While the core tasks of teaching are the same for every teacher, the strategies needed to tackle them are unique.
Our ability to tackle the core tasks of any role is a product of the 'mental model' that we possess.
'Mental model' is just a fancy term for 'what teachers know and how that knowledge is organised to guide perception, decision and action'.
We can systematically build teaching expertise around these core tasks by employing a set of essential development processes (or 'mechanisms').
👊
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Labels play an important role in education. They help students access targeted support and guide us in responding to particular needs.
However, they can also have unintended downsides—they are a double-edged sword.
Labels can influence expectations.
Teachers who know a student’s diagnosis can—often unconsciously—lower their expectations, asking fewer complex questions or offering less peer collaboration.
*Diagnostic overshadowing* can thwart inclusive teaching.
What's useful for teachers to know:
↓
Diagnostic overshadowing is a term originating in medical contexts (and introduced to me by @Barker_J).
It describes the phenomenon where doctors inadvertently place too much emphasis on a patient's diagnosis, overshadowing other significant health concerns.
For example, a patient diagnosed with depression might have their physical symptoms—like fatigue or headaches—mistakenly attributed to their mental health condition, potentially overlooking a critical underlying physical illness requiring separate treatment.
The first idea—cognitive similarity—helps us understand that:
→ the way people learn is more similar than it is different.
Despite its intuitive appeal (largely because it aligns with our modern liberal values), the notion that students learn best when taught in a way that is unique to their particular needs or preferences lacks empirical support and can even impede learning.