Combined Arms Center Profile picture
Oct 16, 2021 28 tweets 12 min read Read on X
ARMOR (Part I): No More Tank Corps
We are not quite done with Cavalry yet, but we have a lot more to cover and as we look at Armor and Infantry the lines are about to cross more than once, so let’s start with a bit of Armor history.
We’ve talked about how the National Defense Act of 1920 stipulated that all tanks would only belong to the Infantry, so to get around this Cavalry worked on finding a range of armored cars, combat cars, and scout cars for their missions.
During World War I, we had a Tank Corps, but there was no consensus on where the tank actually fit within the Army.
The National Defense Act of 1920 attempted to address this issue and the decisions made within the Act were based on our experiences in WWI.
“Under the Act’s comprehensive provisions, the Tank Corps was abolished, and tank units were assigned to Infantry, becoming known as ‘Infantry (Tanks)’.”
“Moreover, the Act’s stipulation that ‘hereafter all tank units shall form a part of the Infantry’ left little doubt as to the tank role for the immediate future.”
Between 1918 and 1922, different parts of the @USArmy presented arguments as to why the Tanks should belong to their Branch. This included the Chiefs of Infantry and the (doomed) Tank Corps, as well as the Chief of Ordnance. @MastersManeuver @USAODCorps @ChiefofOrdnance
The War Department issued a policy in the Spring of 1922 that would ultimately hinder tank development. This policy stated that the primary mission of tanks was “to facilitate the uninterrupted advance of the riflemen in the attack.”
In other words, Infantry was the priority and tanks would primarily be used to support them.
Part of the reason this hindered tank development was that the War Department also decided that since this was their primary purpose, we would only need light and medium tanks.
Light tanks would have to be transported by truck and would weigh no more than 5 tons each. Medium tanks were not to exceed 15 tons as that was the general weight capacity of things like railroad cars and highway bridges…
… and “most significantly” that was the max weight capacity of “available Engineer Corps ponton bridges.” @USACEHQ
There were problems, however. Not just with these stipulations but with the ability to meet them.
An experimental 15-ton tank was produced up to the “mock-up stage” but it was not quite able to satisfy the specifications set by the War Department. Other post-WWI light and medium tank designs struggled to meet the specifications as well.
“In reality, it was simply impossible to build a 15-ton vehicle meeting both War Department and Infantry requirements.”
By 1926, the War Department General Staff reluctantly agreed to the development of a 23-ton tank but added the instruction that efforts were to continue to find a satisfactory 15-ton vehicle to meet the original specifications.
The new Branch Chief of Infantry decided that a light tank that was truck-transportable was exactly what the Infantry needed, much to the chagrin of @USArmy Tankers who argued that we really needed “more heavily armed and armored medium” tanks. @jr_liscano
“The net effect of the Infantry’s preoccupation with light tanks and the limited funds available for tank development in general was to slow the development of heavier vehicles and, ultimately, to contribute to the serious shortage of mediums at the outbreak of World War II.”
Those we did have would prove inadequate, but we'll get to that another time.
Debates amongst Army and War Department leadership were not the only things affecting tank development during the Interwar Years. The designers and manufacturers had disagreements as well.
J. Walter Christie, a private manufacturer, tested, designed, and developed a new model of tank that had the “ability to operate both on tracks and on large, solid-rubber-tired bogie wheels. The tracks were removable to permit operation on wheels over moderate terrain.”
This new model also featured the Christie Suspension, which has independent springs for each wheel. This offered some advantages, including the ability to “attain speeds of 69 miles per hour on wheels and 42 miles per hour on tracks” but not with the tank fully equipped.
“To the Infantry and Cavalry, the Christie was the best answer to their need for a fast, lightweight tank, and they were enthusiastic about its convertibility.”
This video shows footage of the M1931 Christie Tank, which was briefly used by both Infantry and Cavalry in the mid-1930s.
The Ordnance Department recognized the appeal of these features but found the Christie model “mechanically unreliable and that such dual-purpose equipment generally violated good engineering practice.”
This argument between Christie, the @USArmy Ordnance Department, and other designers and engineers continued for nearly the entire Interwar Period. By 1938, the idea of a convertible tank (optional tracks or wheels) was completely abandoned.
If you're just tuning in or you've missed any of the previous threads, you can find them all saved on this account under ⚡️Moments or with this direct link twitter.com/i/events/13642…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Combined Arms Center

Combined Arms Center Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @usacac

May 20, 2023
OPERATION CHASTISE & THE BOUNCING BOMB Image
Operation Chastise was a night bombing raid carried out by the @RoyalAirForce on the evening of 16 May 1943. This raid is also referred to as the Dambusters Raid because the bombers were targeting several dams in the Ruhr industrial area, in western Germany. Image
The Möhne Dam, the Sorpe Dam, and the Eder Dam. Destruction would affect hydroelectric power plants as well as the industries depending on the water. There was also potential for flooding cities and nearby areas if the dams were broken. ImageImage
Read 19 tweets
Apr 22, 2023
A CAPTURED TIGER Image
It seems like it’s about time for a #TankTwitter thread, so today we will talk about the first, largely intact, Tiger I captured by the Allies. Image
The Tiger I was a heavy tank that provided Hitler’s army with the first armored fighting vehicle to feature a mounted 88mm gun. It was big and scary, and it was expensive, both to build and to maintain, which is partly why only a little over 1300 were built. Image
Read 36 tweets
Feb 18, 2023
BATTLE OF KASSERINE PASS
On Tuesday we talked about the Battle of Sidi Bou Zid, and that thread also served as a primer for the third episode of the accompanying #WhyWeFight1943 podcast.
“In their January attacks Axis units puzzled Allied commanders by limiting their own advances and abandoning key positions. Soon, however, the enemy displayed more determination.”
Read 35 tweets
Jan 21, 2023
THE CASABLANCA CONFERENCE (Part II)
On Tuesday, we talked about the secret multi-day trip that President Roosevelt took from the White House on 9 JAN to Casablanca, arriving on 14 JAN, in order to attend a highly classified series of meetings with his British counterpart, Winston Churchill.
This conference involved both FDR and Churchill, and their most trusted senior staff and senior military leaders. During the meetings they established the way forward for the Allies in this war, mapping out “the grand strategy for both the European and the Pacific Theaters.”
Read 47 tweets
Nov 19, 2022
OPERATION TORCH (Part IV)

General Patton Lands in Morocco Image
George Patton was put in command of the Western Task Force, which sailed from the east coast of the US right to Morocco for Operation Torch. The other two task forces sailed from the UK. Image
Patton was on the USS Augusta, which was under the command of Admiral Hewitt (next to Patton in the picture). That little pouch on the front of Patton's belt is actually a police handcuff pouch but Patton used it for a compass. Image
Read 40 tweets
Sep 27, 2022
THE MANHATTAN PROJECT (Part I)
Everyone knows that the United States used two atomic bombs in the Pacific in World War II, and that the US was the only nation in the war to use this new type of weapon. This week we will take a look at the efforts to create these bombs.
The Manhattan Project technically ran from 1942 until 1946, but the American effort itself had actually started in 1939, and we had British counterparts already working on nuclear weapons development by the time the United States jumped on that train.⚛️
Read 46 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(