Rodgers tactically outwitted Solskjaer today. Previously, United-Leicester fixtures consisted of head-to-head 4-2-3-1 vs 4-2-3-1 match ups so it was essentially a battle all over the park. However, today, Leicester implemented a 3-2 build-up shape which destroyed United's press.
Below we can see last seasons fixture where both teams built and pressed way in the same way so tactically neither team had the edge (Evans and Justin out of picture in the second picture). It was all about individual player quality on the day.
However, this season, Rodgers created an overload in the build-up against United's pressing line. Partey was the third CB in possession so this completely discombobulated United's pressing structure. Sancho/Greenwood didn't know whether to press the outside CB or the wingbacks.
Below we can see just how easy it was for Leicester to play out of United's press thanks to a combination of their technical quality and overload in the build-up. This meant that United couldn't exert any control on the game off the ball because Leicester kept it every time.
Leicester, on the other hand, pressed United very successfully within an asymmetric 4-4-2/5-3-2 type shape in which the ball side wingback pressed the fullback, whether that be AWB or Shaw. This helped create defensive overloads on the byline with the midfield matching up inside.
Below is an example of Leicester's 5-3-2 block.
Below is an example of it transitioning into a 4-4-2 shape when United's fullbacks receive possession.
So, when pressing high, Leicester still created last seasons 4-4-2 man-for-man high press against United's build-up, which was much more difficult for United to deal with and play through when compared to the ease in which Leicester played through United's press.
The game was still reduced to fine margins considering United have top players all over the pitch (as do Leicester), so it was still razor right. However, Leicester had tactical advantages took what was a big method chance creation & control for United away from them (pressing).
What I would say is that the game was still 50/50 and it was won in moments with the likes of Maguire letting his team down for 2 goals and a decisive goal being a set piece to put Leicester 2-1 up, so luck wasn't on Solskjaer's side either, but it was luck Rodgers deserved.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Liverpool almost certainly see Jérémy Jacquet as the heir to van Dijk.
Ridiculous profile.
Aerially dominant, aggressive in duels, monster athlete, uniquely long limbs, can play LCB, top on the ball, glides like VVD, assured with an aura. Just needs to mature.
Freak of nature.
I thought Yoro might have been that guy but Jacquet is on another level athletically.
Only thing lacking in his profile and what will tell in time is does he have leadership? Can he look after his own game, let alone lead the defensive line? How reliable is he week in, week out?
In elite-level scouting, you should be able to assess these things with clips, live scouting, references, and speaking to the boy.
Yoro profiled amazingly but looked like someone who would need time.
🔴 Arsenal couldn’t have picked a better time to play Liverpool.
The attack has lost its edge without Salah & in the new diamond shape.
Slot's press is still exploitable.
Plus, Arteta WILL give Arsenal the tactical conditions to win.
Now it’s on his team to execute.
Thread 👇
Liverpool's new-found idea often kills the flow of games because of how difficult they are to press, so Arsenal will need to be patient and defend deep at times.
However, when they do, their intention will be to press where possible.
But they can also be content in that moment.
That change has been to a diamond.
Fullbacks hold the width and at least 4 midfielders packing the middle (if not 5).
Liverpool are very fluid in this moment as each midfielder has license to feel the spaces and roam accordingly.
Spurs weren’t perfect — but the ideas were exceptional.
If this version of Spurs becomes consistent, Thomas Frank can transform the club.
THREAD! 🚨
Thomas Frank reminded us all that he is a top tactician last night.
We just need to see it more often.
Roberto De Zerbi-esque build-up:
🔹 4-2-4,
🔹 Can play over to 1v1's on the top line,
🔹 Narrow positioning to land on 2nd balls,
🔹 Solutions to build vs man-to-man.
TOP 💯
Higher up, Porro inverted into the back 3, Bentancur and Sarr formed a double pivot, and Udogie inverted into the half space between the lines with Johnson holding the width.
3-2-5.
But Porro had license to make the shape a 2-3-5 when Newcastle only left 1 up in transition.
Pep Guardiola has found his latest Manchester City blueprint for success.
It is similar to Arne Slot methodology which saw Liverpool win the title last season.
Imperfect, but it works.
Here's why City can push Arsenal and compete for BOTH the PL & CL this season 🤯
THREAD! 🚨
Pep Guardiola & Manchester City latest stylistic iteration is most similar to Unai Emery & Aston Villa…
Zonal pressing from goal kicks & willing to sit off in a passive block whilst hitting teams on the counter but also still playing out from the back with positional play high.
Manchester City's and Pep's new identity has only become set in stone in recent weeks.
They tried to press in their Lijnders inspired zonal system and had success from goal kicks, but not in open play - they were killed.
Now, they ACCEPT being pinned back and can defend deep.
The new iteration of Pep Guardiola's Manchester City have some clear issues:
💎 Despite being a top coach, Lijnders' defensive idea has not worked whatsoever with this group of players.
💎 Lack physicality to lead the press and win duels.
💎 Missing top-end quality in key areas.
In possession, nobody doubts the quality of Guardiola's structure.
The idea almost always makes total sense.
City build in a 4-3-3 (or a 4-2-4 if Bernardo drops deep) before morphing into a 3-2-5 with Stones inverted into midfield.
Structurally, absolutely no problems here…
But compare the quality Pep had in his previous teams vs now:
Donnarumma is worse technically than Ederson.
Oscar Bobb is not as threatening as Mahrez.
Savinho is not as threatening as Grealish (the treble winning version).
Foden is not De Bruyne.