Notice how discourse around supply chain issues is dedicated entirely to the morality of that discourse’s own sentiment regarding how the issue affects hypothetical individuals. The history and material realities of the international maritime order go completely undiscussed
Cafruny, Alan. 1995. “Class, State, and World Systems: The Transformation of International Maritime Relations.” Review of International Political Economy 2 (2): 285–314.
Carlisle, Rodney. 1980. “The ‘American Century’ Implemented: Stettinius and the Liberian Flag of Convenience.” Business History Review 54 (2): 175–91.
Sharife, Khadija. 2010. “Flying a Questionable Flag: Liberia’s Lucrative Shipping Industry.” World Policy Journal 27 (4): 111–18.
Levinson, Marc. 2006. “Container Shipping and the Decline of New York, 1955–1975.” Business History Review 80 (1): 49–80.
The international maritime order is identical to American global hegemony. It doesn’t exist as some accident. It was planned to incredible degree between the foreign policy establishment and America’s leading industries using wartime public officials as intermediaries
All of the world’s shipping was transferred under the control of flags of connivence sold by US client states like Liberia and Panama, with those states’ share of the revenue acting as a kind of unofficial foreign aid to purchase their complicity in America’s Cold War strategy
Today the Clinton and Gates Foundations and others continue to funnel developmental aid into these same countries, utilizing the same philanthropic infrastructure Edward Stettinius put into place 70 years ago.
The rise of flags of convenience and container shipping both served to undercut American labor unions. Between 1951 and 1976 for instance tens of thousands of jobs at America’s primary port city of New York were liquidated. Covid did not cause our maritime shipping labor shortage
Not only did these projects benefit and find support from shippers, oil companies, anti-unionism, and the Cold War foreign policy establishment, they were a huge boon to real estate redevelopment of America’s rail and port infrastructure. Plans for which in NYC dated back to 1926
Online owns about whether the libs are cringe or not for being sad Christmas is ruined have absolutely nothing to do with any of this. This is a vast international structure of maritime law, offshore financial networks, and international development programs. Wake up
The complete absence of any of this from online discourse demonstrates perfectly how such discourse functions to further conceal and normalize the actual material structures at play while laundering the underlying class interests motivating their perpetuation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For Kant Architectonics is the “legislation of reason,” which consists in the relating of all of the specific content of science to the “essential ends of human reason”. The Canon of Pure Reason is nothing but the set of these ends: soul, world, God / freedom, God,
immortality
The first set of three are the regulative ideas of speculative reason at work in metaphysics. The second set are the ideas of practical reason, the essential ends of morality. But Kant also assigns a practical use to Reason’s speculative ideas.
The Canon of Pure Reason, which Kant defines as consisting of the goals of the strenuous effort of reason, and the only source of positive cognitions pure reason has available, thus is of purely practical and moral use, even for speculative reason itself
Walter Lippmann believed that democracy unmediated by expert authority was impossible, because the public was beset by “stereotypes”, and mass of education to correct this wasn’t feasible. In this his psychology is fundamentally Lockean, Stereotypes being Locke’s “confused ideas”
Leibniz, Kant, and John Dewey all hold an alternative model of discourse. Lippmann conceived mass education as a case-by-case positivist training in specialized social science for every policy topic. Education for Dewey instead involved Methodus, a general science of inquiry
Leibniz’s Encyclopedia is not one that accumulates every fact. His encyclopedia is rather one which covers all the branches of “general science,” or philosophical method, which represented a universal procedure applicable to any subject. The Critique of Pure Reason is such a work
The truth about the “culture war” is that it serves to mystify the underlying historical, economic, and technological processes that created the modern Neo-Liberal order by reframing them in hollow spiritual terms, as a lose of “moral consensus” amidst expanding pluralism
The author sees even secular progressivism as a religious position, growing out of modern currents of protestantism. But the details of this involve John D Rockefeller Jr.’s mobilization of interfaith protestant modernism in constructing an internationalist American hegemony
The role of birth control or abortion in this project derives from the Utilitarian, Malthusian ideology of population control among British liberal elites of the Victorian era. It has little to do with choice, freedom, moral principles, or rights, but rather development economics
Certain works like James Burnham's Managerial Revolution have been recycled in recent discourse as a foundation for understanding the rise of the "professional managerial class". But analysis of this concept is much more pervasive and central in modern philosophy than realized
In 1922 Walter Lippmann wrote in his work Public Opinion about the incoherence of public discourse and about his proposal to create a Central Intelligence Agency, which he interestingly conceived of as a kind of university of expert social scientists managing information.
The transformation of public opinion follows the collapse of utilitarian philosophy following J.S. Mill, whose defense of free speech was only in context of his recognition that public discourse manufactured the legitimacy of the liberal democratic state.
@newconnecticut@morally_supreme@Logo_Daedalus@civit999 I think one difference is Tom Jones is much more about the management of social appearances, of the proper use of constructed identity in the emerging English public sphere. Less a celebration of God given humanity stripped of all its arrogant and false pretensions
@newconnecticut@morally_supreme@Logo_Daedalus@civit999 Tom Jones is more of a mirror world of public personas which each character employs to their own ends. Tom Jones’ weakness is that he takes these at face value, due to his well meaning naivety. Likewise he doesn’t know how to properly project his own identity
@newconnecticut@morally_supreme@Logo_Daedalus@civit999 The Sentimentality really comes from the simple, charming naivety of someone who doesn’t understand the way everyone in society constructs their public selves. And the “lesson” Tom Jones ultimately learns is how to navigate the hall of mirrors and modulate his own appearance