This might sound like a broken record, but @Reuters reporting is really beyond disgraceful. This is a piece about efforts to reestablish diplomatic/trade relations between Colombia and Venezuela. It was the Colombian Senate which took the initiative news.trust.org/item/202110202…
The beginning gives away that we're in for a bias bonanza: "After two years of mudslinging and ruptured ties, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro said it was necessary to repair diplomatic relations with Colombia." "Mudslinging"? Not hiding efforts to thrash Maduro from the off
Then we read that VP Delcy Rodríguez demanded attention to "what she called the Col gov's policy of xenophobia and violence against Vzlan migrants." No mention that this comes after the gruesome killing of 2 Vzlan minors in Colombia. Context shall not get in the way of dishonesty
Colombian president and porky pig impersonator Duque gets the floor to, well, sling mud. As a US puppet he's not to be challenged
"What Colombia is not going to do is recognize a disgraceful, corrupt, drug trafficker dictatorship," Duque said
We wouldn't even know where to begin
First of all, whether Duque likes it or not, he does "recognize" the Maduro govt, because the only border crossing that self-proclaimed @jguaido controls is his building's intercom. "Disgraceful" is rich from a country where on average a social activist is killed every other day
But the most ludicrous part is "drug trafficking". We're talking about the continent's largest drug producer, and it's not close. And even US agencies know the drugs flow north via the Pacific and Central America. It takes real will to serve US interests to let this nonsense fly
And it gets worse (see image). "Aiding the Vzlan opp bring in humanitarian aid" meaning Maduro is the bitter dictator who rejected aid. Only there was hardly any "aid" in what was a stunt to provoke a break in the Vzlan army. Count on stenographers to continue peddling these lies
How big of an imperialist cheerleader do you have to be to use "self-proclaimed" w/o it being in reference to Guaidó? Also the US puppet who has said things freely gets to call Maduro a "dictator," while the demonized humanitarian-aid-hating Maduro only gets a counter-accusation
Colombia's role in coup efforts has been well established, but corporate journos want readers to ignore them w/ the tried and tested "Maduro says" trick. To name just a few
- May 2020 mercenary invasion
- Aug 2018 drone assassination attempt
- May 2004 100+ paramilitaries caught
Anyway, this is the kind of imperialist propaganda that has become the norm. The US-led coup efforts have failed miserably but the corporate media has more than done its part, endorsing everything from mercenary invasions to murderous sanctions. Follow VA to get your antibodies
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Venezuelan National Assembly approved a reform to the country’s Hydrocarbon Law in its first discussion. A second discussion and final vote are expected soon. This is arguably the country’s most important piece of legislation, so let’s look at what’s at stake 🧵🧵🧵
Some background: Venezuela’s present energy legislation was established under the Hugo Chávez govts. It was first approved in 2001 and later had some amendments. In essence, it reaffirmed the state’s sovereignty over natural resources and established control over the oil industry
Chávez’s reforms mandate that state oil company PDVSA hold majority stakes (in some cases at least 60%) and run oilfield operations. Taxes on oil profits were set 50%, royalties were raised (in some cases from 1%) to 30% across the board
The bar is always high (or low, rather), but every now and then the New York Times delivers an all-time masterpiece of journalistic dishonesty and pliant service to US imperialism. This is a piece about (imaginary ties) between Hezbollah and Venezuela: 🧵 archive.is/FPrMQ
First off, the US kidnapped/abducted Maduro. But US exceptionalism runs so deep that corporate stenographers believe Washington can just "seize" foreign leaders. But the relevant part here is that all we have here are claims by Rubio and US officials
This section is just empty fluff meant to malign Iran and Venezuela. Notice the nonsense of saying the countries are "bound by anti-American ideology" like it's some kind of bad taste in music, as opposed to the result of decades of imperialist attacks
A controversial afternoon (on Twitter) after the orangeman-in-chief lashed out at Colombia after the Petro government refused to accept repatriation flights with shackled migrants in military airplanes. Trump threatened tariffs and sanctions, Petro replied defiantly
Trump's disgusting (even by his standards) xenophobic and imperialist antics barely a week into his term have drawn fierce rebukes across the hemisphere. Honduran President Xiomara Castro called for an extraordinary summit in a few days
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro also voice his support, telling his Colombian counterpart he can count on the "strength and experience" of the Venezuelan people and calling for further regional unity
🧵When it comes to reporting about Venezuela, there is no corporate outlet even remotely close to the level of dishonesty of the New York Times. Seriously, it's one piece of misrepresented bullsh*t after another. Follow this thread as we break it down
This is the piece:
The article is not to be taken seriously b/c it starts from a blatant lie. US "prodding" has nothing to do with Venezuela holding elections. It is dictated by the Constitution that they be held this year and they were never in doubt shorturl.at/LFusR
Anyone not high on Western exceptionalism would actually be ashamed of their government meddling in other countries' affairs. But alas, this is the NYT.
In corporate media spiel, "restoring democracy" just means a US puppet being back in the presidential palace
🧵🧵The border dispute between Venezuela and Guyana has flared up recently, leading to a war of words, increased military deployment and increasing signs of US intervention. We have prepared an infographic to explain the history and context of the controversy (thread)
The Essequibo Strip is a sparsely populated, 160,000 square km region spanning to the west of the Essequibo River. It has been the subject of centuries of dispute which, sadly, have never taken into account the indigenous population
Instead, it has always been pretty much about resources. Gold mining is what drove British expansion westward (more on this below), and the recent discoveries of massive oil deposits led to Venezuela and Guyana raising tensions too
About time... Spain's @el_pais reports that the $3 billion in frozen Vzlan assets will soon be released. This was agreed to between the Venezuelan govt and opposition last November! But this thread is to point out the dishonest b.s. from the Spanish establishment's mouthpiece 🧵
This is the article in question:
It essentially relies on anonymous sources who say that the funds will soon be released. El País then covers this fairly straightforward report in a cloak of lies and misconceptionsenglish.elpais.com/international/…
So it begins. How dare Maduro want to access Venezuelan funds? Then it's incredibly disingenuous and racist to claim the govt wants to fix schools/hospitals to "polish its image." If a western govt builds a hospital, it's laudable. If Vzla does it it's to fool voters. GTFOH