Claire Fox Profile picture
Oct 26, 2021 5 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Several of us tonight used what is merely a technical nod through of the Coronavirus Act in the House of Lords to make some comments on the use and abuse of legislation... (1/5)
Whatever about 18 months ago, we're NOT in an emergency now - so emergency legislation becomes a symbol of state power, a threat. There is little scrutiny for new laws (eg mandated vaccines for care workers, & 1000s of NHS staff possibly sacked if they refuse vaccines)... (2/5)
Just when government assures us 'no more general legislation', that the public will be trusted to take responsibility, the threat of CovidPassports returns - despite evidence to suggest they won't work in health terms AND will create a discriminatory two-tier society... (3/5)
We need more debate in parliament and public on these issues; instead, we get demonisation or censorship.

It’s not just society that needs to move on from Covid as a main priority - health ministers need to move on as well... (4/5)
Whether sorting out the backlog of cancer patients, attending to small children with developmental problems after lockdown or care-home residents essentially still being locked down, the government needs to prioritise this long list - not more draconian laws. (5/5)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Claire Fox

Claire Fox Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Fox_Claire

Jun 15, 2023
Thread. Regardless about where you stand on Boris & misleading Parliament, something gnawing at me: why no outrage at a whole range of Covid-related misleading statements at the time? Remember when we all discovered that vaccine helped indivs but didn't prevent transmission? 1/4
Yet despite knowing facts on transmission, politicians on all sides supported sacking care home staff who refused to have vaccine & job or jab enthusiasts misled public by claiming it would protect others. So many examples: made up facts re rule of 6/safe numbers at funerals 2/4
Lots of examples when non Covid harms associated with Lockdown - obvious in plain sight eg impact on children/economy - were denied. Those raising issues were maligned, misleadingly branded as anti-science/ worse. And don't get me started on official misinformation on masks 3/4
Read 4 tweets
May 24, 2022
I spoke about the Schools Bill yesterday - on attendance rates falling in schools… (1/3)
The government’s response is mass data gathering and punitive fines. But as politicians locked down schools for over 2 years, it’s no surprise that some pupils have concluded that school doesn’t matter… (2/3)
The government then threatens freedom of home education using the excuse of safeguarding. But it is IN schools that some pupils aren't safe - eg from gender ideology, as a recent story in the Times pointed out. (3/3)
Read 4 tweets
Jan 19, 2022
🪡We in House of Lords were only scheduled to discuss December's Plan B regulations on the very day of their abolition. So much for scrutiny... 1/5
🪡While some of us might want to celebrate now Plan B is dumped, I am still nervous about a divisive hangover from Covid passes, which divide society into vaccinated and unvaccinated - the latter treated as unclean and a threat... 2/5
🪡This is still a live issue for 70,000 NHS workers facing sack on April 1st because they are not fully vaccinated. Many are rightly now worried about the impact on understaffed hospitals, the RCN even calls the policy reckless... 3/5
Read 6 tweets
Jan 17, 2022
A long night tonight discussing the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. I made a speech earlier, on why the introduction of new hate crime based on misogyny (and *perceived* offence) will do nothing for women's safety... 1/4
The push to make misogyny a hate crime won't help us understand data as fact, but will only tell us how alleged victims feel about their experiences - this broadens out the understanding of what 'misogyny' includes, rather than making things more clear... 2/4
Misogyny means hatred of women - but included in the description of misogynistic hate crime are things like 'spite' or 'ill will'. This amendment says it will help ensure the safety of women and girls - it won't... 3/4
Read 4 tweets
Jan 11, 2022
🪡 A speech yesterday evening on an amendment to the #PoliceCrimeBill, which would protect women’s single-sex spaces in prisons while also sensitively managing challenges faced by trans prisoners - the government didn’t take the amendment... (1/6)
🪡 I read out a few tweets from people criticising the idea that female prisoners would be asked to share space with male sex offenders who self-identified as women. The MOJ says that the system is working well, I’m not so sure... (2/6)
🪡 Quite often the way in which legislation or advice talks about the situation of single-sex spaces in prisons prioritises the feelings and concerns of trans prisoners, leaving women’s issues as a secondary consideration... (3/6)
Read 6 tweets
Dec 15, 2021
🪡 A long-ish, angry speech in the Lords on #PlanB - and on the fact that official opposition have failed to oppose the government's introduction of further restrictions and #COVIDPassports... (1/5)
🪡 Issues like free social association, liberty and personal sovereignty are crucial - not some abstract notion to be dismissed as too many still do... (2/5)
🪡 Other peers raised the lack of efficacy about vaccine passports, or asked Qs about how serious Omicron is to health beyond high transmission, I wanted to stress the real collateral damage to a free society - when illiberal measures are a first, instead of last, resort... (3/5)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(