A lot of folks think this is about @elonmusk but it truly isn’t. WIRED seems to have moved into a world where it maybe just hates the people it writes for.
The story that most made me think this way was this on Brandon Sanderson.
🚨 NEW FULL EP: Nathan Mhyrvold is someone @aarthir and I have idolized for decades. Microsoft's first CTO, renowned chef with multiple books, paleontologist, worked with Stephen Hawking, the list is endless.
Key takeaways (the ep goes into it in detail). Also everyone's life situation is different so may not apply to all - we tried to focus on folks in their 30s mostly who have been around in tech for a few years.
One outcome of @elonmusk + Twitter Files should be social media companies telling users when their content distribution is manually/ algorithmically throttled.
A better outcome would be having alternative clients w/o throttling.
We may or may not agree why someone is throttled or with the people doing it but there's very little arguments against being transparent to all parties about it.
The need for transparency -> assume your favorite social media company is run by a team of people who don’t like you and then make demands of them to be transparent with what happens to your account accordingly.
In short: we have a trust deficit in how social media companies moderate content. I propose building on @VitalikButerin's "credible neutrality" to specifically make the below transparent.
1/ Publish account actions: All account takedowns are published with details on rules violated, agent performing the action (human, algorithm) and the source of the report ( automated scan, report from the platform, etc).