Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
SCOTUSblog Profile picture
@SCOTUSblog
Nov 2, 2021 • 4 tweets • 2 min read • Read on X
Scenes from this morning's back-to-back oral arguments on S.B. 8, the Texas abortion law. All sketches by @Courtartist.

1. Elizabeth Prelogar delivers her debut argument as Biden's solicitor general. She was confirmed to the position last week. sketch of woman standing at...
2. Marc Hearron of @ReproRights argues on behalf of Texas abortion clinics. (Plus a @NinaTotenberg cameo!) sketch showing man standing...
3. Texas Solicitor General Judd Stone argues on behalf of the state of Texas. He argued in both cases the court heard this morning. sketch of man leaning forwa...
4. Jonathan Mitchell, the architect of S.B. 8, argues on behalf of private individuals who wish to bring enforcement lawsuits under the law. sketch of man leaning on le...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with SCOTUSblog

SCOTUSblog Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SCOTUSblog

SCOTUSblog Profile picture
Dec 6, 2022
TODAY AT SCOTUS: It's a day of fraud at the Supreme Court.

The justices will hear two oral arguments -- both involving alleged fraud in two very different contexts.
First: U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources. If a whistleblower sues on the government's behalf under the False Claims Act, how much authority does the government have to dismiss the lawsuit later on? @JakeElberg explains why that matters: scotusblog.com/2022/12/whistl…
Second: Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, a bankruptcy case with an intriguing fact pattern. If a plaintiff wins a judgment against a married couple based on the fraud of one spouse, can the other spouse discharge the debt in bankruptcy? Ronald Mann has more: scotusblog.com/2022/12/a-bung…
Read 4 tweets
SCOTUSblog Profile picture
Dec 5, 2022
TODAY AT SCOTUS: At 9:30 a.m. EST, the court will issue orders on pending petitions. Starting at 10, the justices will hear two oral arguments. One's on a clash between anti-discrimination laws and free speech for businesses. The other's on a technical question of bankruptcy law.
First: The case of a Colorado web designer who opposes gay marriage and doesn't want to design wedding websites for same-sex couples. But a state law says businesses can't discriminate against LGBTQ people. Does the law violate the designer's free speech? scotusblog.com/2022/12/colora…
Next: If First Amendment blockbusters aren't your speed, how about a technical spat over appellate jurisdiction to review certain types of bankruptcy orders? The case stems from the transfer of a lease for a Sears department store in the Mall of America. scotusblog.com/2022/12/justic…
Read 4 tweets
SCOTUSblog Profile picture
Nov 28, 2022
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.
First, in Percoco v. United States, a former Cuomo aide was convicted of taking a bribe to facilitate state approval for a real estate project, even though the aide had no official role in government at the time. Does that stretch the federal bribery law? scotusblog.com/2022/11/former…
Second, in Ciminelli v. United States, Louis Ciminelli was convicted of rigging a $750 million contract for a revitalization project in Buffalo, New York. But the case didn't involve bribes or kickbacks. Is the government's theory of fraud too aggressive? scotusblog.com/2022/11/a-shar…
Read 4 tweets
SCOTUSblog Profile picture
Nov 8, 2022
Today at SCOTUS: Two oral arguments about where and how people can bring a lawsuit. In one case, a worker is trying to sue his company because he was exposed to asbestos. In the second, a woman wants to sue a nursing home over its treatment of her deceased husband.
First is Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway, a case about the power of state courts to hear lawsuits against companies that operate there. It pits originalist arguments against pro-business interests -- so it could scramble the court's typical alignment. scotusblog.com/2022/11/origin…
Next is Health & Hospital Corp. v. Talevski. If a public nursing home violates a federal law that Congress passed under its spending powers, can a private individual then use a civil-rights law to sue the nursing home for violating the individual's rights? scotusblog.com/2022/11/in-fam…
Read 4 tweets
SCOTUSblog Profile picture
Nov 1, 2022
Today at SCOTUS: The justices will hear a pair of cases from prisoners who are challenging their convictions or sentences. Both cases will affect the scope of post-conviction relief for similarly situated people.
First up: Jones v. Hendrix. Marcus Jones was convicted of violating the federal felon-in-possession law. Later, the Supreme Court narrowed the scope of that law. Do the habeas corpus statutes allow him to challenge his conviction now? Noam Biale explains: scotusblog.com/2022/10/on-the…
Next is Cruz v. Arizona. John Cruz is on death row in Arizona. He says the state has repeatedly failed to follow SCOTUS precedent on due-process rights during capital cases. But his challenge may all depend on a procedural rule. @AHoagFordjour explains: scotusblog.com/2022/10/a-due-…
Read 4 tweets
SCOTUSblog Profile picture
Oct 31, 2022
Today at SCOTUS: Will affirmative action remain legal under the 14th Amendment and federal civil rights law? The court will hear arguments on that question in a pair of challenges to the admissions policies at UNC & Harvard. @AHoweBlogger has our preview: scotusblog.com/2022/10/in-cas…
For further reading on the affirmative-action cases, here's our guide to the nearly 100 amicus briefs that were filed: scotusblog.com/2022/10/a-guid…

And here's our symposium in which a diverse group of experts and advocates weighed in on the issues at stake: scotusblog.com/category/speci…
It will be a busy morning. At 9:30 a.m. EDT, SCOTUS will issue orders on pending petitions. Then at 10 a.m. the arguments begin. The UNC case is up first, followed by Harvard. (Ketanji Brown Jackson has recused herself from the Harvard case because she served on a Harvard board.)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(