The responses to John McManus's tweets about the parallels between the way the BBC was reluctant to look into Jimmy Saville and the way it has been reluctant to look into abuse done in the name of gender ideology tell their own story
This pile on is a concerted effort to use shame to shut someone down from talking about abusive behaviour and institutional failure to face up to it.
After John McManus tweeted an article about abusive behaviour and institutional failure to face up up to it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Prof Whittle appears to be arguing individuals shouldn't be able to held liable for sexual harassment if their inappropriate behaviour was sanctioned by their employer.
I gave evidence in the Sandie Peggie case because the hospital board & male Dr refused to accept as findings of fact that that men are more likely to commit violent & sexual crimes, that men are more dangerous to women, so women are more heavily impacted by men in their spaces than vice versa.
You can read my witness statement here.
These are the facts it attests to.
You don't need a degree of any sort to understand these facts.
I've written to @stonewalluk CEO Simon Blake applauding his leadership in discarding Stonewall's previous extreme and divisive definition of "transphobia".
And explaining the damage that it did.
It's not good enough to quietly back away from it after doubling down for so long