Sex determination in mammals is binary. Every karyotype in humans results in a male or female.
Genetic errors, such as the unequal distributions of chromosomes (nondisjunction), do not create new sexes.
This shows us that karyotype (the collection of an individual’s chromosomes) is conceptually independent from what sexes are.
It is true that 46:XX and 46:XY are tightly linked to females and males, respectively, but it is not true that this is the defining feature of F and M.
In other words, you can have a karyotype outside of the norm, and you will still be a male or female.
Ex: XXY = male; XO = female
If I wake up tomorrow and find out that I have XX chromosomes, that would be quite the shocking discovery, but I’d still be a male.
This is because male and female are defined by the phenotypes that produce small or large gametes, respectively, not chromosomes.
This definition is the universal biological meaning of male and female.
And it applies to all species that reproduce through gametes of differing size and form (almost all species in the plant and animal kingdoms).
The fundamentals for why sex is binary can be condensed into four simple principles.
The details of how the binary is composed is different among species.
For example, humans are gonochoric: each individual is either male or female through their entire life.
And clownfish are sequential hermaphrodites: individuals can change from male to female.
Even in species that are incredibly different, like humans and clownfish, male and female are defined the same: the phenotypes that produce small or large gametes, respectively.
Q: Male seahorses gestate and birth the baby seahorses, a trait usually found in mammalian females.
What makes them male?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The category “Woman” is not defined through a set of cultural attitudes and roles determined by society. If it is, it is truly amorphous and forever changing.
But in reality, it’s defined by hundreds of thousands of years of human biology—the adult human female.
Thinking that woman is purely defined by culture is a category error: it’s like missing the forest for the trees.
It’s true that there have been many cultural roles given to women throughout history, but the category itself is not a cultural role. It’s a biological one.
It’s the biological one, not in the sense that women have a predetermined set of *behaviors*, but rather a predetermined *body structure* that produces large gametes and gestates offspring. This system can never be separated from the meaning of “woman.”
Gender ideology co-opts and appropriates everything it touches.
From congenital conditions like DSDs and psychological conditions like dysphoria, to terms like “assigned sex at birth” in rare cases of intersex infants and “conversion therapy” against LGB.
Nothing is theirs.
They do this because gender ideology is vapid and foundationless. It’s built on subverting and dismantling all norms, and it will use any old tools and concepts to accomplish this, no matter whether they actually relate to gender ideology or not.
For example, take “conversion therapy.”
In the context of gays and lesbians, it used to mean trying to change someone’s sexuality, an objective, innate part of someone.
Ideologues have an imbalance of compassion: 100% for the in-group and 0% for the out-group.
It's natural to show more compassion to those who are close to us, but it has to be balanced.
Both 100% and 0% compassion (with no truth to balance) are devouring forces.
Our narcissistic culture is obsessed with showing ultimate compassion to those who agree with us, and zero compassion to those who dare disagree.
This type of culture creates ideologues.
Woke culture is a prime example, where "inclusiveness" means "we're all safe because we all agree" and not "we're all safe because we respect one another, even if we don't agree."
Compassion imbalance. Nothing is calibrated correctly. Your inclusiveness becomes highly exclusive.
Not being a *typical* male or female does NOT mean you’re not a male or female.
This is a core belief about bio sex in the gender ideology: everyone must fall within the average to be considered male or female, that male and female are average clusters of traits which we as society decide to label as M or F.
But as we know from statistics, data falling outside the average is still included, it’s still categorized into the bell curve. The only way the average can even exist is through diversity, through people not all being the same.
In simplest terms, when you think “phenotype”, just think “body.”
The definition uses phenotype because it has to apply to all anisogamous species. If it gave specific characteristics, like testes and ovaries or penis and vagina, it wouldn’t be broad enough.
Sex is the fusion of two gametes. Humans develop reproductive systems that support either the small gamete role (male) or the large gamete role (female).
Using chromosomes as evidence of unique sexes conflates the "how" with the "what": how sexes develop vs what sexes are.