They key element of informed consent for mandates is voluntariness.
At law, informed and consent elements are not possible without voluntariness, with this being a due process of law imposed by the common law to protect patients from powerful clinicians and now their employers.
Citing Sir Edward Coke, The US Supreme Court stated in 1855 that The words, "due process of law" (in the 5th & 14th Amendments), were undoubtedly intended to convey the same meaning as the words, "by the law of the land", in Art.29 Magna Carta.…
"NO Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will We not pass upon him, nor condemn him, but by lawful judgment of his Peers, or by the LAW OF THE LAND" ,,,
,,, We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right. Art.29 Magna Carta (1297)…
Liberty of the Subject Act (1354) "That no Man of what Estate or Condition that he be, shall be put out of Land or Tenement, nor taken, nor imprisoned, nor disinherited, nor put to Death, without being brought in Answer by due Process of the Law."
Observance of due Process of Law (1368)
"It is assented and accorded, for the good Governance of the Commons, that no Man be put to answer without Presentment before Justices, or Matter of Record, or by due Process and Writ original, according to the old Law of the Land:
And if any Thing from henceforth be done to the contrary, it shall be void in the Law, and holden for Error.…
We can therefore refer to Supreme Court judgements on due process in USA to help us understand our due process clauses in UK and the Commonwealth where our case law is perhaps lacking or lost in the depths of time.…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Weston A. Price Foundation, London Chapter

Weston A. Price Foundation, London Chapter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WAPFLondon

29 Oct
In R (A) v SOS Home Dept [2021] UKSC 37 The Supreme Court confirmed regarding government guidance that:
"public authorities have a general duty not to induce violations of the law by others."
Can CQC induce clinical negligence by ignoring informed consent?…
See Paragraph 38. "by adapting Lord Templeman’s words: does the policy in question authorise or approve unlawful conduct by those to whom it is directed? So far as the basis for intervention by a court is concerned, we respectfully consider that Lord Bridge & Lord Templeman
were correct in their analysis that it is not a matter of rationality, but rather that the court will intervene when a public authority has, by issuing a policy, positively authorised or approved unlawful conduct by others.
Read 4 tweets
29 Oct
Dean v Phung [2012] NSWCA 223
(Supreme Court of appeal New South Wales, Australia)
"consent is invalid when the treatment provided is not necessary for the patients condition”
The dentist provided treatment purely for financial gain. Sound familiar?…
"A practitioner's honest & reasonable belief that a patient has consented is no defence to a claim in tort. The absence of consent may flow from the incapacity of the patient, innocent misrepresentation or maladministration or fraud"
"negligent advice that treatment is required will cause trespass despite the practitioner's belief in the necessity for treatment. This would avoid the limitations on recovery of damages imposed by the Civil Liability Act & expose the practitioner to criminal charges for assault"
Read 4 tweets
11 Oct
The UK's forgotten Declaration of Independence
The ASSOCIATION - Exeter 19/12/1688
"WE whose Names are hereunto subscribed, who have now joined for the Defence of the Protestant Religion, & for maintaining the ancient Government, & the Laws & Liberties of England, Scotland, & Ire
do engage, to Almighty God, to his Highness the Prince of Orange, & to one another, in the Defence of it; & never to depart from it, until our Religion, our Laws, & our Liberties are so far secured to us,
in a free Parliament, that we shall be in no danger of falling under Popery & Slavery.

& whereas we are engaged in this common Cause, under the Protection of the Prince of Orange, by which means his Person may be exposed to the desperate and cursed Attempts of Papists,
Read 9 tweets
3 Oct
@pjhlaw is this leaflet suitable to satisfy the lawful requirements for informed consent? Is it written in a language aimed at a person who has capacity to make complex medical decisions?…
From the booklet:
"Recently, cases of infammation of the heart (called myocarditis or pericarditis) have been
reported very rarely after COVID-19 vaccines.
Most of these cases have been in younger men and usually a few days after the second vaccination."
"Most people recovered and felt better following rest and simple treatments."

Yet, From the Myocarditis Foundation:
"There is no cure at present for either type of myocarditis."
Read 6 tweets
2 Oct
Polish MPs protest for Australia’s human rights outside the Australian embassy.
"The whole world sees what is happening in Australia. Australia has contracted Covid madness."
Here is the full speech:
"Polish MPs Protest at Australian Embassy"
via @YouTube
Peaceful protest is protected in Victoria (& rest of Aus, Can & NZ) by Art.5 Bill of Rights (1688)
"That it is the Right of the Subjects to petition the King and all Commitments and Prosecutions for such Petitioning are Illegall."…
Read 4 tweets
30 Sep
Moment killer cop stopped Sarah Everard on street for a fake Covid check.
Yet this is just the tip of an iceberg on how @metpoliceuk violated (battered) our minds, bodies & souls via Covid fraud, breaching their oath to uphold our ancient laws and customs
The Association (1688), made statute by the Crown and Parliament Recognition Act (1689). England's Declaration of Independence:
"WE whose Names are hereunto subscribed, who have now joined for the Defence of the Protestant Religion, and for maintaining the ancient Government,
and the Laws (Common Law) and Liberties of England, Scotland, and Ireland, do engage, to Almighty God, to his Highness the Prince of Orange, and to one another, in the Defence of it; and never to depart from it,
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!