Ten years ago in NAP4 there were 9 cases of undetected oesophageal intubation with harm reported.
No location was exempt.
3/16
Technology - capnography - identifies when intubation fails
It should be used for all tracheal intubations (& remain until after extubation) wherever/whenever they occur
A flat capnograph should be assumed to be due to oesophageal intubation until actively excluded
4/16
Capnography is not an added extra it is a mandatory part and parcel of tracheal intubation.
Yes there are many other cases of a flat capnograph...but it's not anaphylaxis or bronchospasm until you've first excluded oesophageal intubation
The consequences are catastrophic
7/16
This is also the case during cardiac arrest
During cardiac arrest
-a flat capnograph must first be assumed to be due to oesophageal intubation....until this is excluded
-if the tube is in the trachea there will be an attenuated capnograph trace
.....but its about more than capnography.
This 'traps' the error but can we prevent the error?
Human factors/ergonomics teaches us that 90% of the solution should be design (prevention) rather than barriers (error trapping) @Fionafionakel@RCoANews
10/16
Some thoughts on error prevention & undetected oesophageal intubation
Videolaryngoscopy
Consistent monitoring
Hardware is important in performance (& IS part of human factors and ergonomics)
@Fionafionakel states 'good technical skills make space for good human factors'
11/16
...but training, including & respecting the team changes the culture.
It empowers staff in a crisis.
It's more about behaviour than kit.
'Change intubation from 'me to we'
When I talk about the 'shared airway' I mean everyone on the room can contribute
12/16
If coming into a crisis situation - what do you do?
How to apprise the situation & use fresh eyes?
Frailty (ie clinical frailty scale score >4) was a big issue in the aetiology of perioperative cardiac arrest
TL/DR
-a high proportion of cases
-frail patients’ more likely
*to be emergency surgery
*to be major surgery
-increased complications
-insufficient illogical monitoring (IMO)
-low rates of DNACPR recommendations
-insufficient risk assessment & communication
-these patients account for a substantial proportion of cardiac arrests
-risk assessment (& communication) poor
-drug dosing an issue in many
-periop cardiac arrest rate ≈8-fold higher than the young & fit
-successful ROSC rate notably lower
-overall early mortality after periop cardiac arrest 40-fold higher then in the young & fit
Frailty arguably a bigger issue than older age
It is a topic relevant t to
-all anaesthetists,
-all perioperative physicians
-orthogeriatricians
- those planning services
& many more
Quick summary 🧵 for amongst others
@JulianCorbettF
NAP5
Awareness
-TIVA was associated with a doubling in frequency of accidental awareness (during general anaesthesia (AAGA)
-what a lot of people missed was that when TIVA was used correctly in a TCI mode there was no signal
-most AAGA during TIVA was due to syringe/delivery errors, programming errors, erroneous use of manual infusions especially when converting from volatile to TIVA (eg to transfer sick pt to ICU or radiology)
-6% of GAs were TIVA. 90% of these in theatre were TCI. Outside theatre 18% were TCI.
-pEEG (BIS) use was low at 2.8%
-much higher with TIVA:
*8% without NMB
*23% with NMB
-report recommended universal use of BIS when TIVA used with paralysis
In NAP6 (anaphylaxis) we took stock of all drugs used during anaesthesia
-use of TIVA rose to 8%
-pEEG monitoring was used in 12%
*rising to 32% with TIVA
*38% with TIVA + NMB
-with variation by specialty, anaesthetist seniority & BMI
In NAP7 (perioperative cardiac arrest) we collected data on TIVA & pEEG use but not on NMB use
-TIVA use rose dramatically to 26%
*a 4-fold rise in a decade
-pEEG rose to 19%
*a 7-fold rise
-pEEG use during TIVA rose to 62% (likely close to 100% during TIVA + NMB though we did not measure this)
-implying good impact of the previous recommendation (which has been repeated by others)
CARDIAC ARREST DURING OR AFTER SURGERY IN UK PRIVATE HOSPITALS
This is a timely reminder that all healthcare has risks & safety is at the heart of everything we should be doing.
Timely also as I was speaking today to the Independent Healthcare Providers Network (IHPN) about Perioperative Cardiac Arrest in the Independent healthcare sector -based on the findings of the @RCoANews NAP7 report.
A thread on what we found. Not all of which is comfortable. But it is an important discussion.
@bbchealth
@BBCPanorama
@RCoANews
TLDR NAP7: Perioperative cardiac arrest in private hospitals
To be clear much work takes place in all sectors to promote safety. The vast majority of anaesthesia and surgery is very safe and outcomes good. But anaesthesia and surgery has risk, some of which is unpredictable.
Being safe and preparing for unusual events is difficult and it is likely harder in settings that are smaller and more remote than in a large NHS hospital.
The purpose of the NAP7 study was to examine the data on cardiac arrest in or after surgery and to explore areas where care may be improved.
2/15
We studied perioperative cardiac arrest across the UK
-how hospitals prepared for cardiac arrest
-anaesthetists' experience of managing cardiac arrest
-risk of cardiac arrest during or within 24 hours of anaesthesia care (usually surgery)
Controversially, I’ve been chatting about population TRIAGE today
A short 🧵& some polls at the end
Early in the pandemic the risk of healthcare being ‘overwhelmed’ was high on the agenda with population triage a logical consequence. Lockdown was to prevent this.
1/11
I now consider triage to be of three types
Triage by prognosis Normal decision-making led by prognosis (& patient’s goals)
Triage by resource
- by individual
- at population level
The latter is not normal
2/11
Decision-making with patients based on prognosis is a doctor’s job.
The other two are arguably decisions for society (or in an emergency for our politicians)
To paraphrase Clemenceau “life and death is too important to be left to the doctors”