First performed in 1850, this was his final opera before starting Der Ring cycle.
Come find out why the tale of Lohengrin, "irresistibly attracted and enthralled," Wagner to create a new, "genuine poem of the Folk."
Throw off your shackles! Your Folk calls!
First, you must understand Wagner.
He said,
“I am the most German being. I am the German spirit.”
This one quote defines Wagner. His motivations, his character, his essence. Truly his nature is one tied with Germany.
His name and works will be echoed by Germans forever.
He aspired to bring the German people into a new cultural era.
He accomplished this by creating novel folklore.
Wagner considered operas to be the highest form of poetic drama, and Lohengrin was made to fully utilize this format.
Before continuing, please wait, I implore you. Take a moment and experience what Wagner has done.
This is a nice chorus sequence from Lohengrin sung by the Chor der Bayreuther.
I would even prefer you listen to this than read the thread.
The Lohengrin tale was first revealed to Wagner when he was writing "Tannhauser". This first encounter seemed to be a mystical experience for him. In Wagner's autobiography, he simply says, "with one blow a whole new world of poetic stuff was opened."
The Lohengrin tale first appears in Wolfram von Eschenbach's "Parzival" (the subject of Wagner's final opera).
Lohengrin is a variation on the Swan Knight tale where an unnamed man rescues a damsel under the solitary condition that he may keep his anonymity.
You likely know the "Bridal Chorus" from Lohengrin. It's commonly referred to as the "wedding song or Here Comes the Bride". This song and "Flight of the Valkyries" are probably the two most iconic pieces of Wagner's music.
The opening performance in Weimar was scheduled to coincide with the birthday of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (author of the RW's fan-favorite play "Faust") who was born on 28 August.
Like "Faust", Lohengrin would show itself to be a sublime work. A treasure for the German people.
While writing Lohengrin, Wagner felt an, "utter loneliness." Beset with restlessness and perfectionism, he often felt that his genius was shackled by the constraints of our world. Yet, a "fanatical yearning, was born of that feeling of isolation," and he poured it into Lohengrin.
Lohengrin was meant to touch the pulse of our most human emotion. Love.
Wagner said, "Lohengrin sought the woman who should trust in him," and, "love him as he was." But his maiden fails to uphold his one request and our forlorn hero must depart back, "into his loneliness."
In Wagner's words, Lohengrin's, "longing was not for worship nor for adoration, but for the only thing sufficient to redeem him from his loneliness, to still his deep desire,—for Love, for being loved, for being understood through Love."
Wagner saw the character of Lohengrin as, "the only absolute tragedy, in fine, of the tragic element of modern life; and that of just as great significance for the Present, as was the "Antigone "—though in another relation—for the life of the Hellenic State."
Before his opera, Wagner was appalled by the public's opinion of the character.
Wagner said, "It seems, most hard to comprehend, how the story should have been so misunderstood that Lohengrin was looked on as a cold, forbidding figure, more prone to rouse dislike than sympathy."
Lohengrin's intent was to elicit basic emotions accompanied by deep introspection. Critics often were unable to grasp this. Most 19th c. opera critics could find nothing with which to compare Wagner. Their basis was Meyerbeer, Spontini, and Rossini and Wagner were wholly novel.
Defending his opera, Wagner claimed, "In effect, this "Lohengrin" is an entirely new phenomenon to the modern mind... only he who is able to free himself from all our modern abstract generalisms, and look Life straight into the eyes, can understand this Lohengrin."
It was made for the German people, yet only the observant could truly understand it.
All may see, yet few could comprehend.
Or, as Wagner would say, "Criticism had proved itself unequal to alter the denouement of my Lohengrin."
Was Wagner too haughty, or could he see a future his "peers" were unable to envision? Listen to the opera and let me know.
For SaxonGurth, Lohengrin is up there with King Lear. Few works of art can so touch my soul. How fatal is the quest for pure love when coupled with our natural, often terminal, inclination toward curiosity?
Nothing would please me more for you to DM me and talk more Lohengrin.
There is much more to say, but, as you may know, I try to keep my threads short.
If there is interest I can expand upon whatever is requested.
Remember, if you're German, this is for YOU. They can take every almost everything but they can never take this. Go with God.
Friends, as always, I hope you have enjoyed this thread. I really make them for you all. Praying you all have a wonderful rest of your week.
Between AD 113 - AD 193 the attitude of Rome shifted from an having assured right of conquest to questioning the ethics of "empire".
Looking at these two columns we can literally see the Roman Empire losing their taste for expansionism.
The Column of Trajan (CoT) depicts his conquest of Dacia in the AD 100s. In the following years Trajan would expand Rome's border to its maximum extent.
These were likely the empire's best years and the optimism of her people along with their resolve showed they wanted more.
The Column of Marcus Aurelius (CoA) shows Rome's victory over Germanic tribes around the Danube around AD 180.
During Marcus Aurelius' reign he wrote a stoic journal-esque book titled "Meditations" in which he lamented the necessity of war and began considering humanist ethics.
This thread will explore some popular criticisms of Richard Wagner and attempt to dispel them.
First, I'm unapologetically a great admirer of Wagner. I think his genius is unmatched not only in opera but in the artistic realm.
I'll explain...
Wagner is a great example of the Heideggerian confluence of history and progress. His art is monumentally spiritual.
Drawing deeply from German lore, Wagner poured his soul into creating his operas. The outflowing passion was so genuine and touching it had an ethnogenic effect.
Only a first rate genius could provoke such raw emotion from his audience. It touches almost everyone who hears it.
A young Ad0lf H1tler, met one of his closest friends at a showing of Wagner's Rienzi.
Recounting the event, H1tler allegedly said, "At that hour it all began!"
His father was butchered before his eyes, he was driven from his home, enslaved by his kin, and forced into destitution. Most men would succumb.
Sigmundur would not.
He would become a renowned warrior and eventually bring Christendom to the Faroe Islands.
Sigmundur’s life and actions are recorded in the Færeyinga Saga.
This history records the lives and deeds of important Norwegians and Faroese during the final years of the first millennium AD into the dawn of the second.
It was likely authored during the 1200s in Iceland.
Brestir, father of Sigmundur, was impaled by a rival’s spear while his son sat nearby and watched. Comforting his distraught cousin, Sigmundur said, “Let us not weep, cousin, but remember it the longer.”
He was spared from death by his father’s rivals, but sold into slavery.
The first codefication took place under the Frankish King Clovis (481-511).
Moving from oral/ancestral legacy of jurisprudence to a literary one heavily influenced NW Europe.
Here are a few of SaxonGurth’s favorite laws:
Gallo-Romans trained in the Roman legal tradition assisted the Franks in translating their customs into law.
An important development is the codification of the ‘wergild’ system.
Some laws are required in every just society. Here’s how the Franks dealt with rapists.
Salic Law was undoubtedly a tacit endorsement of legalism. Take for example the laws ‘Concerning Insults’.
Today, we live in a much more developed society. In lieu of a fine you now lose your job, access to easily transferable capital, and people threaten your life + family.
Wagner is one of the most recondite men our society has produced.
This thread is dedicated to exploring his final opera - Wagner's magnum opus - Parsifal, and his exegesis of Christianity imbued within.
First a disclaimer and a suggestion:
1) The thread will not include music theory. Perhaps I will cover that in another post, but it is not my strength.
2) Before continuing, take a second and pull up the overture to Parsifal.
Solti's rendition is great.
For the folks at home:
Wilhelm Richard Wagner was truly a polymath. A brilliant polemicist, philosopher, and composer, Wagner contributed heavily to the cultural development of 19th c. Europe. He is primarily known for his 13 completed operas - the final of which being Parsifal.