Thread by @LT3000Lyall

This whistleblower report on serious inadequacies in the Pfizer vaccine trials is big news. The allegations are credible. The British Medical Journal has published the paper & given the huge implications, would not have done so w/out serious consideration

bmj.com/content/375/bm…

The whistleblower has a long and respected career in trial quality control, and the article noted they have provided the BMJ with "dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails". The amount of such evidence for BMJ to publish must be very substantial.

Pfizer outsourced the trial to contract research organization Ventavia, who are alleged to have engaged in questionable conduct. The typical commercial conflicts apply here (Ventavia has repeat business with Pfizer) - i.e. wanting to give the client the trial outcome they wanted.

Everyone's belief in the safety and efficacy of the vaccines is based on the data from this trial, and it is now of questionable integrity and can no longer be used to justify those conclusions. This is a fairly substantial development to say the least. New trials are needed.

The fact that these irregularities have emerged significantly increases the credibility of the many scientists and doctors who have been highlighting serious problems with the vaccine & adverse events, often at serious risk to their careers and reputations.

It seems like an unlikely coincidence that such a large number of highly qualified people would raise concerns; so much "smoke" about this vaccine exists; and we now have concrete evidence that the trial data is sullied.

It is an absolute outrage that billions of doses of Pfizer's vaccine have been given, and many countries coerced their citizens into taking the vaccine under threat of losing their jobs, freedom of movement & effective ability to leave their houses, based on corrupted trial data.

Pro vaxxer Dr John Campbell walks methodically through the allegations & substance of the paper here, for those less inclined to read the original paper. He is concerned and is not able to offer any rebuttal.