.@ErikWemple is holding Steele dossier dupes accountable. But in the process he tries to make other Russiagate fiction look credible, e.g. the Senate Intel report. Like Steele, that report makes outlandish, unsupported claims undermined by the available evidence. 
See my two-part report on what Senate Intel got wrong: (realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/…)
(realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/…)
(realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/…)
Senate Intel's biggest "finding" is that K. Kilimnik is a Russian spy, a claim Mueller & FBI never made. For good reason: it's a joke, as all the evidence shows.
See 1st article above & my follow-up reporting, which exposed a key Mueller falsehood: realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/…
See 1st article above & my follow-up reporting, which exposed a key Mueller falsehood: realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/…
See also @mtaibbi 's recent Kilimnik interview: (taibbi.substack.com/p/konstantin-k…)
Unlike Mueller, the FBI, and the Senate Intel committee, Matt and I actually contacted Kilimnik. Imagine that. Why do you think they refused to do what we did?
Unlike Mueller, the FBI, and the Senate Intel committee, Matt and I actually contacted Kilimnik. Imagine that. Why do you think they refused to do what we did?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
