Hi there, I live in D.C. and when I saw this post, I was deeply skeptical because I haven't seen gas prices this high anywhere in the District. So, I did some digging.
Summary: yes, Mr. Blitzer's pic here is accurate and also extremely misleading. Here's why...
From what I can tell, there are about 35-40 active Exxon gas station locations in D.C. proper. It was unclear to me if several of the locations I looked up are active, so I'm including those in this range.
Google is kind enough to provide gas price updates for individual stations through its map function.
Mr. Blitzer took a pic of a gas station where Regular is $4.30/gallon.
There are two Exxons in D.C. with that price: 200 Mass Ave. NE and 5521 Conn Ave. NE
My initial hunch was that he took this pic at 200 Mass Ave. NE, and using Google Street View, that was easy to confirm with this old picture of the location. More on this specific gas station in a second because a lot of D.C. folks know it well. (Thus, the hunch!)
There aren't a lot of gas stations close to this one. There's another Exxon to the south of this spot on Penn Ave. that's $4.50/gallon. Both of these are at heart of Capitol Hill. And if you were to only focus on these two stations, you'd think gas is bonkers expensive.
But if you look for ALL gas stations on Capitol Hill or in the general area around it, you find:
-- a Marathon 1.1 miles away with Regular for $3.56
-- a Shell that's less than 1.5 miles away where gas is $3.58 for Regular
-- a Valero 1.8m away w/ $3.54 for Regular
Remember that Exxon I mentioned where gas is $4.50?
Just down from it on Penn Ave. are three stations:
-- a bp where Regular is $3.70
-- a Sunoco where it's $3.60
-- another Exxon where it's $3.60
I have used all these stations at some point or another.
Gas in D.C. is most expensive on or near Capitol Hill or near Georgetown. But if you do, you know, a quick Google search, you can find relatively cheap gas in the District. One such site (washingtondcgasprices.com) ranks low gas prices.
$2.97 at that bp on Georgia Ave. NW!!!
That site also ranks the highest gas prices in the District that have been recently updated (not all gas locations are necessarily updated daily).
See at the top? It's the 200 Mass Ave. NE location where Mr. Blitzer took his pic.
Let's talk more about this 200 Mass Ave. NE location.
It's across the street from the Union Station grounds (tourists/rental cars) + near the Capitol grounds (a concentration of higher incomes, obviously).
So, folks who don't know any better and folks who can easily afford it.
If you live in D.C. and live on Capitol Hill, especially, this particular Exxon is known as a "break glass in case of emergency" station for most residents. It's the place you can find easily in a pinch if you're running late or just need the convenience otherwise.
It is not, however, the gas station that most residents would claim as their primary. It is not the station you would tell a friend or family member to go to. It is not a station where, if you've lived here a while, you would present as representative of D.C. gas prices.
This gas station is well-known to D.C. folks. It's located not too far from where I live. I have used it a number of times but always for the convenience, not for the price. Most of the time, I use the stations on Penn Ave. I mentioned earlier.
The Exxon at 200 Mass Ave. NE is an incredibly shoddy example of rising gas prices as it does not reflect the general market. It's an outlier. It's a tourist trap. It's for D.C. folks who can afford the occasional splurge for convenience. And again, this is all well-known.
Mr. Blitzer is right that gas prices are increasing, of course. That's unsurprising given that we've all spent the past 20 months at home, driving far less. Folks are driving again. The market is responding to that. And yet... the national avg. for Regular is $3.41
I grew up in a family where we didn't know if we'd be able to afford gas every week. I get the anxiety of seeing these rising prices. It's expensive.
But it's very strange that Mr. Blitzer, knowing this Exxon is an outlier, would frame it as a good example of D.C. gas prices.
Mr. Blitzer is one of the most well-known news personalities in the country. He's influential. His tweet was an attempt at insight into everyday financial worries of ordinary Americans, which is why it's quite disappointing that it completely lacks context.
It's misleading.
Here's a good primer on the question "who controls gas prices in the U.S." from @maiteknorrevans, a journalist who has clearly done the work in understanding gas prices and why they're rising. Give it a read!
I write a blog with stuff like this all the time. It's free and easy to subscribe. All you need is an email. Takes less than five seconds. And it helps me *immensely*.
If you like this thread, do me a solid and subscribe to my blog:
Well, here's a fun plot twist. I'm pretty sure Wolf Blitzer took a photo of the same gas station about a month ago with the same "gas prices in D.C. today" framing.
This now feels pretty deliberate on Wolf Blitzer's part, like he's intentionally reporting the gas prices from a well-known tourist trap station because it's blatantly sensationalist.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The people whom you're afraid to engage on trans rights and systemic racism and misogyny, because you've been led to believe these are distracting "culture wars" that will hurt Democrats, have spent this week attacking Big Bird for making kids feel safe getting a COVID shot.
My point here is that there is no such thing as static "culture wars". If you stopped talking about all these others things under the assumption it'll make Democrats more appealing, "culture war" proponents would simply and easily find something else to make a "culture war".
These people spent enormous time earlier this year falsely claiming that school districts and public libraries were banning Dr. Seuss. It wasn't true. At all. But it got significant media attention. Soon, people were asked which side they're on: ban Dr. Seuss or not?
I honestly wonder how long Dr. Wen would advise trans folks to wait for full equality. Five years? Ten years? At what point do trans people become worthy of dignity and rights and not reduced to a "culture war". Please advise, @DrLeanaWen. I would love some guidance.
I'm not kidding. I really would love an answer here.
If trans folks are such a cultural impediment to more important objectives, what is the metric @DrLeanaWen would advise to gauge our entry into a demand for full equality? Why are we bargaining chips? Why are we negotiable?
If trans people are still vulnerable to being denied housing based solely on our gender identity because of an intentional absence of anti-discrimination protections in 30 states, one wonders why @DrLeanaWen would imply this somehow isn't a public safety issue?
The price-of-milk story on CNN today is astonishingly incomplete and sloppy. It reminds me of when the Dr. Seuss controversy got ramped up, and despite little evidence for the claim and a lot of missing context, some reporters just ran with it. Disappointing, to say the least.
1. They failed to verify the price of milk claimed by this family, which is false.
2. They failed to disclose that several of the eight kids are grown adults over 21.
3. Or that the parents are Republicans.
4. Or a rational comparison of grocery prices.
I mean...
I'm not even opposed to featuring this family in a segment for a different perspective, but all relevant context that would undermine their claims have either been bizarrely overlooked or--and I hope this isn't the case--completely ignored.
Hey folks! If you're voting today, there's a decent chance a queer woman candidate is on your ballot. Here are 20 queer women on ballots across the nation today who are endorsed by @TeamLPAC. Take a stroll through this thread and see if you're voting for one of them!
Meanwhile, Kelly Jeanne-Lee is running for a different seat on Atlanta's City Council. She's a teacher who has campaigned on, among other things, affordable housing. Also: she's not on Twitter, so bonus points.
Greg Abbott just signed a bill in Texas this evening that bans trans children and student-athletes from competing on sports teams that align with their authentic gender identity. Overruling medical experts and iconic women athletes like Megan Rapinoe and Billie Jean King.
Texas had already essentially banned trans kids from authentic participation in sports by requiring it align with the gender of their birth certificate. But UIL permitted legally amended birth certificates to fit this restriction. No more. This bill requires at-time-of-birth.
Here's a cruel irony: the number of trans student-athletes in Texas in K-12 sports could, at best, barely fill a standard classroom. At best. More than likely, we're talking like a dozen kids. Maybe. And yet, when asked where this is a problem, Abbott couldn't respond.