Huge NEWS: Today the New York Times reported on a lawsuit, initially filed in secret, alleging a coordinated effort by NY officials to silence people attempting to expose pervasive corruption by prosecutors. It's a fascinating case for a few reasons: nytimes.com/2021/11/10/nyr…
The federal lawsuit alleges that the case had to be filed in secret because New York officials, including Queens DA and Corporation Counsel for the City of New York, threatened a group of law professors that **publicly talking about their prosecutor grievances was illegal.**
The lawsuit alleges that these New York "law enforcement" officials then violated the First Amendment again by threatening the professors that even **telling the public about the threats made against them** by the City's lawyers and Queens DA would be illegal.
The suit arises out of pervasive corruption among New York's unaccountable prosecutors, and the many years of NY officials doing little to hold them accountable. A group of professors simply took public findings of prosecutor misconduct by judges and filed ethics complaints.
Intentional violations of the constitutional rights of criminal defendants is itself a federal crime. But no NY prosecutors have been prosecuted for even the most egregious crimes they perpetrated, and they are very rarely disciplined at all. They are often promoted.
In order to address this problem, we @CivRightsCorps teamed up with an amazing group of law professors to bring attention to these problems:
After years representing the most vulnerable people in our society, this is first time we @CivRightsCorps have been forced to be a plaintiff ourselves, to vindicate our own rights alongside the professors who are being threatened for their speech. Read it: accountabilityny.org/wp-content/upl…
Stay updated on the case by following @CivRightsCorps. We'll keep you updated on what happens with this important 1st Amendment civil rights case, and with the epidemic of prosecutor misconduct in New York.
THREAD: One of the core recurring problems in our society and in our media is focusing too much on individuals and not enough on systems. When something bad happens, we (and the media) want to find "bad" people to blame for it. This is dangerous.
For example, the petrochemical industry created the largely useless idea of plastic recycling to get individuals (starting with children) to feel moral blame and praise re: recycling just so that everyone would stop asking: why do we have all this plastic? theintercept.com/2019/07/20/pla…
When there is an act of police violence, many people's first response is to blame a "bad apple cop." It's not “bad apples" who quintupled the US human caging rate. It's not "bad apples" who have led US to cage Black people at 6 times South Africa at the height of Apartheid.
Thread. Another teenager was killed by the cash bail system in Houston. He was 19, had an IQ of 62, and weighed 98 pounds. He had never been arrested before, and the DA and the judges put him in a cage because he couldn't pay a couple thousand dollars. His story is important.
The jail didn't even bother to bring the teenager to court for his own bail hearing b/c he was being evaluated for mental health issues. Despite never having been accused of a crime before, the judge agreed with DA that his release should be barred unless he paid $$$.
Jailing a person solely because they cannot pay cash is unconstitutional. The DA and judge here jailed the teenager without him even being at the hearing and without making the findings required by law--an intentional judicial act that is itself a federal felony crime.
THREAD. This is a beautiful, devastating, inspiring article by @stillsarita. As you read it, pay close attention to the rampant wage theft and other corporate crimes against some of the most vulnerable working families in our society. A few thoughts: newyorker.com/magazine/2021/…
First, although there is an epidemic of wage theft costing low wage workers over $50 billion per year--way more than the amount of all police-reported property crime--this issue is almost never investigated or prosecuted by "law enforcement."
Second, it's important to understand why police, prosecutors, and judges ignore these crimes that cost far more money than all property crimes in every local court combined: a main function of the criminal punishment bureaucracy is to crush and control the poor.
Thread. U.S. Marshals investigation into the D.C. jail found "punitive denial of food and water" in the area of the jail detaining impoverished almost exclusively Black people awaiting trial. washingtonpost.com/local/public-s…
Punitive denial of food and water would be a federal crime. Although this has been going on for years, you never have and never will see prosecutors choose to prosecute any jail officials. "Law enforcement" only targets some people for some crimes.
Marshals reported “large amounts of standing human sewage . . . in the toilets of multiple occupied cells” and many cells in which water “had been shut off for days.” This has been happening for years to poorest people in capital of richest country on earth. Mayor knew about it.
This thread is about two facts: 1) Human caging kills. Each year in custody reduces a person's life duration by two years; 2) It is a scientific fact that human caging does not reduce crime. These two facts are not widely known, and that is a failure of judges and media.
First, take a moment to let this sink in: We know that caging people kills them. Every time a judge jails someone on cash bail or sentences them to prison, the judge is literally killing the person sooner. @PrisonPolicyprisonpolicy.org/blog/2017/06/2…
Second, social scientists who study incarceration disagree on a lot. But the thing that the entire research community agrees on is that human caging do not reduce crime. This is an incredible finding that is almost entirely absent from media reporting.
In response to a modest proposal to make it easier to discipline criminal cops, the D.C. police chief just openly suggested to the D.C. City Council that they can't expect officers to "respect constitutional rights" if they pass the measure.
A fascinating thing about this video is that this "law enforcement" official believes that following constitutional law is some sort of quid pro quo that cops can extract concessions for. He also seems to think that cops have some sort of "right" to commit crimes with impunity.
When this *police chief* talks about the "rights" of officers to avoid discipline for their serious crimes, you can see just how deeply ingrained the culture of police impunity is, as well as the police bureaucracy's total disdain for democratic control.