You may remember Ayanda which won a £252m deal to supply facemasks of which £155m worth were unusable by the NHS.
And you may remember that civil servants were worried about not giving Ayanda a contract because of the political connections of Andrew Mills who worked for Ayanda as a consultant.
And that the Department of Health didn't consider a potential conflict of interest before giving Ayanda that £252m contract. nao.org.uk/press-release/…
And that Tim Horlick of Ayanda claimed he had just been approached by "a Chinese lady" who offered him a contract which enabled Ayanda to make £40m.
But we hadn't been able to work out what Andrew Mills had made from his consultancy arrangement because he had quite deliberately chosen to change the nature of his company to one that didn't need to publish its accounts.
Someone has helpfully leaked documents to Private Eye showing that Mills was paid £32.4m.
Private Eye also reveals that another Ayanda director made £11.6m commission on the deal.
Together these sums amount to, it seems from Private Eye's reporting, £84m of profits from your taxes going not to suppliers of facemasks but to middle-men who were lucky enough to have the right political connections.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jo Maugham

Jo Maugham Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JolyonMaugham

9 Nov
Yesterday we published this about @Siobhan_Baillie. We stand by every single word - and we have linked to all the documents so readers can make their own minds up. goodlawproject.org/news/siobhan-b…
Ms Baillie has - as is her entitlement - published a lengthy response in her local newspaper which you can read here. stroudtimes.com/mp-refutes-cla…
As I have said, we stand by every word in our blog and we have published all of the underlying documents so you can make up your own minds.

But what I do want to draw attention to is this bit which I've highlighted in yellow.
Read 8 tweets
6 Nov
Remember the public outrage when Government voted to allow privatised water companies to continue the routine dumping of raw sewage into our rivers and our beaches?

Here is what Government proposes to try and rescue itself from shit-creek.
It is a cruel trick on those of us who want to be able safely to swim in our rivers and beaches. And who don't understand why Government falls over itself to protect water companies who have taken £57bn+ in dividends whilst destroying our waterways. theguardian.com/environment/20…
The proposal isn't worth the paper it is written on for two reasons. It's a confidence trick on the public, a political ruse. Let me explain why.
Read 7 tweets
5 Nov
Because it's Friday and I am of generous spirit I shall share with you a short story about Jim Bethell who is something of a cult figure at Good Law Project.
So some time ago, we spotted that Jim was a big user of the rocket emoji (🚀) (check out his twitter). We assume the 🚀 captured something of the Tiggerish optimism of Brexit. Perhaps, indeed the character revealed by his emoji use was amongst the reasons why he was hired?
Anyway, as time went on, and Government lawyers redacted more of the juicier bits of their disclosure, including the names of email correspondents, we came to believe we could identify Jim from the liberal 🚀🚀s. And this gave us a note of pleasure in dark times.
Read 6 tweets
5 Nov
Boris Johnson's defence to all of this, I am afraid to say, is cobblers. THREAD
The guidance for the register of MPs interests can be seen here publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cm… and the relevant paragraphs are 35c and 25a.
35c deals with visits outside the UK and says you don't need to disclose "Visits wholly unconnected with membership of the House or with the Member's parliamentary or political activities (e.g. family holidays)."
Read 7 tweets
3 Nov
The journey that began with Boris Johnson backing Dominic Cummings over his trips to Durham and Barnard Castle reached a destination today. The rules never apply to them.
I hope and think it's fair to say that no organisation in the country is doing more to tackle sleaze - and the collapse in our democratic standards - than @GoodLawProject.
We can only do that vital work with your support.

If you want to empower us to do more please join our mailing list here actions.goodlawproject.org/subscribe...
Read 4 tweets
2 Nov
The history of searching out - and amplifying - wrongs that exemplify negative stereotypes of minorities has a long and ugly history.
History shows as that in racist societies black men were presented by the media as sexually predatory. In homophobic societies, gay men as paedophiles and lesbians as undesirable. And in anti-semitic societies, Jews as avaricious.
Straight, conforming white people escape because the tactic - of demonising those who cannot speak back - is the preserve of those with power.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(