With Gerrard's appointment at Villa in mind, I take a deep-dive into his managerial abilities and achievements at Rangers in an effort to predict how he fits in at the club. Regardless of that, the entertainment value in the PL increases tenfold with Stevie G back ✌️
THREAD.
Gerrard is an exciting appointment for Villa but the key to him improving as a coach within his 4-3-3 centres around the aggressiveness of the fullbacks, much like Nuno at Spurs and Klopp at Liverpool. Nuno was sacked due to a lack of aggressiveness, Klopp won a PL/CL due to it.
Gerrard sets his teams up in the same narrow 4-3-3 shape as Klopp at Liverpool and it led to his Rangers team having an invincible season, breaking Celtic's decade long dominance by winning Rangers' first league title in 10 years, and only conceded 13 goals in 38 games!
Structurally, Gerrard's Rangers were compact and difficult to play through, particularly when aggressive high up the pitch. This aggression was most prevalent early on in games which saw them go 1-0 up before being able to manage gamestate within a more passive narrow 4-3-3.
This was enabled by the fact that Rangers had superior quality to every team in Scotland so they could control games early on when it was frantic with their aggressive pressing whilst being superior technically to each team. Against the likes of B. Leverkusen, it didn't work.
In those games, Rangers were forced back into a deep block and had 35% of the ball in both the home and away leg. This is normal because Leverkusen have better technicians, but it's also down to structural issues too. Rangers were passive when pressing the opposition fullbacks.
Another example can be seen below against Celtic. Celtic are building play here but Rangers are passive and are easily forced back into a deep block - this is problematic because their structure isn't conducive to defending deep. There's lots of space on the sides to exploit.
Within the Premier League, each team has top technicians to easily make that pass and force Gerrard's Villa back into a deeper block. Within that deep block, there's a lot of space down the sides to exploit and that's where teams combine so Villa will be very vulnerable.
When Villa's narrow 4-3-3 block is easily bypassed, and it will be if Gerrard doesn't improve upon the lack of positional aggression from the fullbacks, they'll be defending with 7 players with the wide players shuttling back but that's not going to keep out nearly every PL side.
The likes of Liverpool, City, Chelsea and lower teams like Brentford will get a lot of joy down the sides and use their combinations on the side to exploit that major weakness within Villa's deep block. Villa will also be exploitable when transitioning into that deeper block.
So, what Gerrard wants to prevent is defending deep. If his team is defending deep within that narrow 4-3-3 structure, then he's got major issues. To improve upon that, he must 1) be more aggressive with the positioning of the vertical block & 2) task the fullbacks to press high.
So, a specific example of that exact scenario can be seen here. Liverpool's general block is much higher than Rangers' block thus increasing the pressure on the build-up. The narrow 3-3 press is also backed up by the fullback who ultimately retrieves possession for The Reds.
Nuno tried to replicate Klopp's Liverpool but failed miserably due to the conservative positioning of the fullbacks. Liverpool defend in the same shape but the difference is when the oppositions fullbacks receive each lane is closed off because they're pressurised from all angles
So, Liverpool's block shift across in this manner which has each angle/player covered:
Or when pressing even higher up the pitch they press in this manner (crucial focus is on the ball-side fullbacks for each team).
Each passing lane is covered. If the ball carrier wants to recycle, Salah is right on top of him, if he wants to go inside, Hendo is there, if he wants to go down the line, TAA is in his way. The only free pass is to switch the play under intense pressure, but that's not feasible
So, for Gerrard to succeed in the Premier League he must improve the aggression in which his teams press in the narrow 4-3-3 shape. Personnel is not an issue either - the likes of Ings, Watkins, McGinn, Nakamba, Targett, Cash, etc, etc are all suited to this intense style.
Gerrard's understanding of balance in terms of combining player profiles for his system is good, and his on-ball structure is good too and is again very similar to that at Liverpool, but none of that will matter if he doesn't enable his teams to control games without the ball.
Overall, it'll be interesting to see which way Gerrard sets Villa up and if he improves upon his structural issues at Rangers despite the top job he did there - I am merely suggesting that once his specific Rangers system style faces higher quality competition it can be exposed.
However, at Rangers, that system was good enough thanks to the opposition Gerrard's teams faced, and that saw his teams accumulate phenomenal achievements within his time at the club. He quite literally could not have done a better job.
Either way, it's great to have him back 👍
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Spurs weren’t perfect — but the ideas were exceptional.
If this version of Spurs becomes consistent, Thomas Frank can transform the club.
THREAD! 🚨
Thomas Frank reminded us all that he is a top tactician last night.
We just need to see it more often.
Roberto De Zerbi-esque build-up:
🔹 4-2-4,
🔹 Can play over to 1v1's on the top line,
🔹 Narrow positioning to land on 2nd balls,
🔹 Solutions to build vs man-to-man.
TOP 💯
Higher up, Porro inverted into the back 3, Bentancur and Sarr formed a double pivot, and Udogie inverted into the half space between the lines with Johnson holding the width.
3-2-5.
But Porro had license to make the shape a 2-3-5 when Newcastle only left 1 up in transition.
Pep Guardiola has found his latest Manchester City blueprint for success.
It is similar to Arne Slot methodology which saw Liverpool win the title last season.
Imperfect, but it works.
Here's why City can push Arsenal and compete for BOTH the PL & CL this season 🤯
THREAD! 🚨
Pep Guardiola & Manchester City latest stylistic iteration is most similar to Unai Emery & Aston Villa…
Zonal pressing from goal kicks & willing to sit off in a passive block whilst hitting teams on the counter but also still playing out from the back with positional play high.
Manchester City's and Pep's new identity has only become set in stone in recent weeks.
They tried to press in their Lijnders inspired zonal system and had success from goal kicks, but not in open play - they were killed.
Now, they ACCEPT being pinned back and can defend deep.
The new iteration of Pep Guardiola's Manchester City have some clear issues:
💎 Despite being a top coach, Lijnders' defensive idea has not worked whatsoever with this group of players.
💎 Lack physicality to lead the press and win duels.
💎 Missing top-end quality in key areas.
In possession, nobody doubts the quality of Guardiola's structure.
The idea almost always makes total sense.
City build in a 4-3-3 (or a 4-2-4 if Bernardo drops deep) before morphing into a 3-2-5 with Stones inverted into midfield.
Structurally, absolutely no problems here…
But compare the quality Pep had in his previous teams vs now:
Donnarumma is worse technically than Ederson.
Oscar Bobb is not as threatening as Mahrez.
Savinho is not as threatening as Grealish (the treble winning version).
Foden is not De Bruyne.
Enzo Maresca may be unlucky in certain regards because the expectations at Chelsea are to compete with Liverpool and Arsenal when his squad is quite simply not on that level (the XI is, but the depth behind it is not), but he can't be excused for Chelsea's mid-block or mentality.
Chelsea dominate the ball in most games they play.
And they are incredibly well set-up tactically when they do have the ball.
For example, against José Mourinho's Benfica, Chelsea set up in a 2-3-5 shape with both fullbacks inverted
Defending against teams who use a box midfield or a 3-2 build-up shape in open play.
Liverpool only press with 4 against Palace's 5.
Good teams manipulate this to get time on the ball before playing vertically through Liverpool's block 👇
Arne Slot's idea in this moment is to trap the opposition to one side whilst leaving the far-side opponent unmarked.
This can work, on occasion, and it often works from situations like goal kicks because Liverpool can position themselves where they want from restart moments.
But, in open play, the opposition can often use the overload to their advantage, even more so if they get the goalkeeper involved to create a 6v4.
Simple switches of play or short & sharp combination play amongst the 3-2 shape can get guys like Wharton facing forwards with time.
Xabi Alonso has created the most tactically complete Real Madrid that I have ever seen.
4-2-4 build-up, 3-2-5 attack, man-to-man pressing from the goal kick, & most importantly Madrid are getting effective pressure on the ball in open play!
A breakdown of the new-look Madrid 👇
Alonso has implemented some 🔝 in-possession dynamics.
A positional idea but fluidity/freedom is encouraged within the framework.
For example, Tchouaméni (one of the most intelligent players alive) has taken up a Kroos-esque role in the left half space with Carreras pushing on.
With Tchouaméni dropping outside the shape, he becomes hard to pick up within the opposition's press but it also creates another number higher on the left hand-side of Madrid's attack.
So, instead of attacking with only 3 in a triangle, Tchouaméni makes it a quartet.