EBL Profile picture
Nov 11, 2021 20 tweets 7 min read Read on X
With Gerrard's appointment at Villa in mind, I take a deep-dive into his managerial abilities and achievements at Rangers in an effort to predict how he fits in at the club. Regardless of that, the entertainment value in the PL increases tenfold with Stevie G back ✌️

THREAD.
Gerrard is an exciting appointment for Villa but the key to him improving as a coach within his 4-3-3 centres around the aggressiveness of the fullbacks, much like Nuno at Spurs and Klopp at Liverpool. Nuno was sacked due to a lack of aggressiveness, Klopp won a PL/CL due to it.
Gerrard sets his teams up in the same narrow 4-3-3 shape as Klopp at Liverpool and it led to his Rangers team having an invincible season, breaking Celtic's decade long dominance by winning Rangers' first league title in 10 years, and only conceded 13 goals in 38 games!
Structurally, Gerrard's Rangers were compact and difficult to play through, particularly when aggressive high up the pitch. This aggression was most prevalent early on in games which saw them go 1-0 up before being able to manage gamestate within a more passive narrow 4-3-3.
This was enabled by the fact that Rangers had superior quality to every team in Scotland so they could control games early on when it was frantic with their aggressive pressing whilst being superior technically to each team. Against the likes of B. Leverkusen, it didn't work.
In those games, Rangers were forced back into a deep block and had 35% of the ball in both the home and away leg. This is normal because Leverkusen have better technicians, but it's also down to structural issues too. Rangers were passive when pressing the opposition fullbacks.
Another example can be seen below against Celtic. Celtic are building play here but Rangers are passive and are easily forced back into a deep block - this is problematic because their structure isn't conducive to defending deep. There's lots of space on the sides to exploit.
Within the Premier League, each team has top technicians to easily make that pass and force Gerrard's Villa back into a deeper block. Within that deep block, there's a lot of space down the sides to exploit and that's where teams combine so Villa will be very vulnerable.
When Villa's narrow 4-3-3 block is easily bypassed, and it will be if Gerrard doesn't improve upon the lack of positional aggression from the fullbacks, they'll be defending with 7 players with the wide players shuttling back but that's not going to keep out nearly every PL side.
The likes of Liverpool, City, Chelsea and lower teams like Brentford will get a lot of joy down the sides and use their combinations on the side to exploit that major weakness within Villa's deep block. Villa will also be exploitable when transitioning into that deeper block.
So, what Gerrard wants to prevent is defending deep. If his team is defending deep within that narrow 4-3-3 structure, then he's got major issues. To improve upon that, he must 1) be more aggressive with the positioning of the vertical block & 2) task the fullbacks to press high.
So, a specific example of that exact scenario can be seen here. Liverpool's general block is much higher than Rangers' block thus increasing the pressure on the build-up. The narrow 3-3 press is also backed up by the fullback who ultimately retrieves possession for The Reds.
Nuno tried to replicate Klopp's Liverpool but failed miserably due to the conservative positioning of the fullbacks. Liverpool defend in the same shape but the difference is when the oppositions fullbacks receive each lane is closed off because they're pressurised from all angles
So, Liverpool's block shift across in this manner which has each angle/player covered:
Or when pressing even higher up the pitch they press in this manner (crucial focus is on the ball-side fullbacks for each team).
Each passing lane is covered. If the ball carrier wants to recycle, Salah is right on top of him, if he wants to go inside, Hendo is there, if he wants to go down the line, TAA is in his way. The only free pass is to switch the play under intense pressure, but that's not feasible
So, for Gerrard to succeed in the Premier League he must improve the aggression in which his teams press in the narrow 4-3-3 shape. Personnel is not an issue either - the likes of Ings, Watkins, McGinn, Nakamba, Targett, Cash, etc, etc are all suited to this intense style.
Gerrard's understanding of balance in terms of combining player profiles for his system is good, and his on-ball structure is good too and is again very similar to that at Liverpool, but none of that will matter if he doesn't enable his teams to control games without the ball.
Overall, it'll be interesting to see which way Gerrard sets Villa up and if he improves upon his structural issues at Rangers despite the top job he did there - I am merely suggesting that once his specific Rangers system style faces higher quality competition it can be exposed.
However, at Rangers, that system was good enough thanks to the opposition Gerrard's teams faced, and that saw his teams accumulate phenomenal achievements within his time at the club. He quite literally could not have done a better job.

Either way, it's great to have him back 👍

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with EBL

EBL Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EBL2017

Oct 1
A SCATHING REVIEW of Enzo Maresca and Chelsea 🔵

“Respect defending or DIE!”

MEGA-THREAD! 🚨Image
Enzo Maresca may be unlucky in certain regards because the expectations at Chelsea are to compete with Liverpool and Arsenal when his squad is quite simply not on that level (the XI is, but the depth behind it is not), but he can't be excused for Chelsea's mid-block or mentality.
Chelsea dominate the ball in most games they play.

And they are incredibly well set-up tactically when they do have the ball.

For example, against José Mourinho's Benfica, Chelsea set up in a 2-3-5 shape with both fullbacks inverted

The idea made total sense against the 4-5-1. Image
Read 31 tweets
Sep 28
Arne Slot has one clear tactical flaw:

Defending against teams who use a box midfield or a 3-2 build-up shape in open play.

Liverpool only press with 4 against Palace's 5.

Good teams manipulate this to get time on the ball before playing vertically through Liverpool's block 👇 Image
Image
Image
Arne Slot's idea in this moment is to trap the opposition to one side whilst leaving the far-side opponent unmarked.

This can work, on occasion, and it often works from situations like goal kicks because Liverpool can position themselves where they want from restart moments. Image
But, in open play, the opposition can often use the overload to their advantage, even more so if they get the goalkeeper involved to create a 6v4.

Simple switches of play or short & sharp combination play amongst the 3-2 shape can get guys like Wharton facing forwards with time. Image
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Sep 22
Xabi Alonso has created the most tactically complete Real Madrid that I have ever seen.

4-2-4 build-up, 3-2-5 attack, man-to-man pressing from the goal kick, & most importantly Madrid are getting effective pressure on the ball in open play!

A breakdown of the new-look Madrid 👇 Image
Image
Image
Image
Alonso has implemented some 🔝 in-possession dynamics.

A positional idea but fluidity/freedom is encouraged within the framework.

For example, Tchouaméni (one of the most intelligent players alive) has taken up a Kroos-esque role in the left half space with Carreras pushing on. Image
With Tchouaméni dropping outside the shape, he becomes hard to pick up within the opposition's press but it also creates another number higher on the left hand-side of Madrid's attack.

So, instead of attacking with only 3 in a triangle, Tchouaméni makes it a quartet. Image
Image
Read 13 tweets
Sep 19
Newcastle-Barcelona is another clear example of why you need to actually watch games as opposed to seeking narratives through X.

Newcastle could have been 3-0 up inside 30 minutes & finished the game with more xG even though they often failed to get shots off.

Barca suffered 👇 Image
Newcastle primarily played direct to use their superior physicality to bully Barca (often via restarts), but they also had some superb routines to bypass Barca's aggressive press.

Here, Martín jumps, Trippier sets inside, Elanga comes short, Gordon receives 1v1.

TOP automatism. Image
Image
Image
Image
Another one.

Barca jump man-to-man, Livramento plays around the corner into the feet of Joelinton, and Newcastle are in a great position to find the space in behind Barca's offside trap.

Plus, when they did find the space beyond (often through Elanga), they were not clinical. Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 9 tweets
Sep 17
Thomas Frank and Spurs main problem in the 4-3-3 👇

The idea is to create a 3v2 in the first line against a 4-4-2, whether that be with the #6 dropping low or staying in the #6.

But the wide triangles have 2 wide with 1 inside.

Hard to combine like that.
Low AND high width means your team plays in straight lines.

What is the winger meant to do here?

Spence passes to Simons, Pepe back-presses to cut the angle off to Spence, and Simons is stuck with his back to goal with a defender behind AND in front of him.

He loses the ball.. Image
Image
Image
This was a consistent theme for Spurs on both sides.

Even if the fullbacks wants to play in behind for the winger it is much more difficult to play straight balls beyond the defensive line than it is to play an angled one. Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
Aug 24
Aside from Fulham's goal kicks where United could lock on man-to-man, Ruben Amorim’s defensive idea prevented United from getting reliable pressure on the ball in the game.

As the game wore on, United got even worse defensively.

R. Amorim has to improve.

Post-match analysis 👇 Image
Marco Silva played a 3-1-6 shape with Fulham’s #9 and #10 pinning United’s centre backs and their #8’s overloading the midfield two outside the block.

United's wingbacks were also consistently pinned which prevented them from getting out to Fulham's fullbacks when they were low.
United also struggled to build out from the back and consistently kicked long because of the ever-lasting issues with the centre back inverted into the #6.

This can work because it creates 2nd ball situations with United's great forwards in close proximity, but it invites chaos.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(